Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji Narodowa Agencja Programu Uczenie się przez całe życie Program Erasmus Mundus Akcja 1 programu Erasmus Mundus jako inicjatywa wspierająca ideę wspólnego kształcenia sposób przygotowania i realizacji wspólnych studiów. Beata Skibińska, FRSE
Plan prezentacji Ogólna charakterystyka wspólnych studiów magisterskich zgodnych z zasadami programu Erasmus Mundus; Ogólna charakterystyka wspólnych studiów doktoranckich zgodnych z zasadami programu Erasmus Mundus; Kryteria oceny wspólnych studiów w programie Erasmus Mundus
EMMC charakterystyka ogólna An EM Masters Course must: Have a duration of one to two years (60 to 120 ECTS) in PL 90-120 ECTS be coordinated by an HEI located in a European country Be implemented by a consortium of European and, where relevant, third-country HEI; minimum eligible consortium = full partners from 3 different European countries (at least 1 EU Member State) provide high-quality education to European and third-country students and reserve a number of places for Erasmus Mundus scholarship holders;
EMMC charakterystyka ogólna An EM Masters Course must: be an integrated programme in all its aspects be based on consortium agreement signed by the governing bodies of the partner HEIs (signed before signature of specific grant agreement) include a mandatory mobility component be fully developed at the time of the application and ready to run for 5 consecutive editions as from 2012/13 be fully recognised by first students enrolment
EMJD charakterystyka ogólna An EM Joint Doctorate programme must: Be designed as training and research programme lasting for a maximum period of 4 years; Involve doctoral candidates from Europe and third countries and reserve every year a certain number of places for EM fellowships holders; Have a joint governance structure with joint admission, selection, supervision, monitoring and assessment procedures, Have a transparent fee policy
EMJD charakterystyka ogólna An EM Joint Doctorate programme must: Include training/research periods in at least 2 of the European countries; Ensure that candidates spend at least 2/3 of their programme in Europe for the period covered by fellowship; Offer employment contract to EM fellowship holders; Be based on EMJD agreement Provide for the use of at least 2 European languages
Finansowanie wspólnych studiów, jeżeli zaakceptowane do finansowania w programie EM Zasoby własne uczelni (kadra, infrastruktura) Kwota ryczałtowa dofinansowanie kosztów zarządzania dla całego konsorcjum (EMMC 30.000 na jedną edycję; EMJD 50.000 na jedną edycję) Czesne pobierane od studentów w wysokości nie przekraczającej dopuszczanej przez KE wysokości EMMC 4.000 (A) lub 2.000 (B) / semestr EMJD 300 non-laboratory; 600 laboratory courses/ month Dofinansowanie z innych źródeł
Erasmus Mundus selection process Action 1 EACEA: Exclusion, eligibility and selection criteria EU Delegations: Eligibility 3C HEIs National Structures: Eligibility EU HEIs Recognition degrees External experts: Assessment of proposals Selection Board Evaluation Committee Selection Decision
Kryteria oceny jakości projektów Akcji 1 w programie Erasmus Mundus Erasmus Mundus Master Courses (EMMCs) Academic quality course content (30%) Course integration (25%) Course management, visibility and sustainability measures (20%) Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate Programmes (EMJDs) Academic and research quality (25%) Partnership experience and composition (25%) European integration and functioning of the programme (20%) Students services and facilities (15%) Provisions for EMJD candidates and fellowships holders (15%) Quality assurance and evaluation (10%) Programme management and quality assurance (15%)
Kryteria decydujące o jakości AWARD CRITERIA Europejskie Studia Magisterskie Erasmus Mundus Erasmus Mundus Master Courses (EMMC)
A.1 Academic quality course content Describe the EMMC objectives (including in socio-economic terms) in relation to the needs analysis in the field(s) concerned. Justify using concrete evidence - the EMMC's added value compared with existing masters courses in the same field at national, European and international level. Present the structure and content of the EMMC and justify the added value and relevance of the mandatory mobility component. Justify the learning outcomes relevance in view of the students' future academic opportunities (e.g. at doctorate level) and employability. Justify the relevance of the consortium composition and the expertise of the key academic staff involved to achieve the EMMC objectives. Explain the EMMC interaction with the professional socioeconomic/scientific/cultural sectors concerned.
A.2 Course integration Justify the extent to which the EMMC is organised in a truly integrated way. Justify the extent to which the EMMC is recognised in participating countries and leads to the award of an official degree by each of the partner institutions. Describe the type of degree(s) that will be awarded to successful students. Describe the consortium joint student application, selection and admission procedure. Describe the joint examination methods and mechanisms in place between the consortium partners to assess the students' achievements.
A.3 Course management, visibility and sustainability measures Describe the organisation of the cooperation mechanisms within the consortium. Explain how the students' participation costs to the EMMC have been calculated and agreed upon by the consortium. Describe the way the EMMC will be managed from a financial point of view. Describe how the consortium development and sustainability plan is designed in order to ensure the proper implementation and continuity of the joint programme beyond the period of Community funding and present the Consortium s proposed actions for complementary funding. Describe the course promotion measures taken by the consortium to increase the course's (and the EM programme's) visibility and attractiveness.
A.4 Student services and facilities Describe the nature of the information (/support) provided to students prior to their enrolment and the way this information will be delivered. Describe the content (and, if available, provide a model) of the Student Agreement defining the rights and obligations of the two signing parties. Present the services that will be provided by the partner institutions to host students / scholars including the nature and coverage of the mandatory insurance scheme. Describe the consortium language policy. Indicate the measures taken to facilitate networking among the Erasmus Mundus students and between these students and other students from the partner institutions.
A.5 Quality assurance and evaluation Describe the internal evaluation strategy and mechanisms in place. Describe the external quality assurance envisaged.
Kryteria decydujące o jakości AWARD CRITERIA Europejskie Wspólne Studia Doktoranckie Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate (EMJD)
B.1 Academic and Research quality Describe the EMJD objectives (including in scientific and socioeconomic terms) in relation with the needs analysis in the field(s) concerned. Justify using concrete evidence - the joint programme's added value and distinctiveness compared with existing programmes at national, European and international level. Present the education, training and research programme, including its originality, innovative aspects and scientific quality notably as regards research methodologies and approaches. To what extent does the programme include inter-sectorial and inter-organisational collaboration Describe the nature and quality of the expected outcomes from the innovative, educational, scientific and technological points of view, including in terms of skills and competences acquired
B.2 Partnership experience and composition Justify the relevance of the consortium composition and the expertise of the key academic and research staff involved to achieve the EMJD objectives Describe the complementarity (in terms of education, training, research or dissemination/valorisation activities) of the consortium members and their diversity (in terms of countries / regions, types of organisation, etc.). Present the partnership track records in terms of networking and cooperation activities (through their joint involvement in EU/international research and/or education projects). Where applicable, justify the role and appropriateness of the professional/non-academic (/economic/scientific/cultural) sector participation in terms of activities and responsibilities.
B.3 European integration and functioning of the programme Describe the extent to which the EMJD programme is organised in a structured and integrated way. Justify the relevance and appropriate organisation of the mandatory mobility periods of the candidates in the participating institutions. Describe the common standards and mechanisms developed by the consortium for the application, selection, admission and review of doctoral candidates (European and third-country). Justify the appropriateness and the quality of joint supervision and monitoring of the candidate activities (including the exams for the taught part and the assessment and defence of the thesis) to ensure the highest quality of the outcomes. What is the kind and nature of the degree(s) awarded? If applicable, what are the measures taken or envisaged by the consortium to deliver a fully accredited and recognised joint degree?
B.4 Provisions for EMJD candidates and fellowship holders Present the information and promotion strategy envisaged by the consortium to reach out potentially interested candidates, in particular those from third countries? Present the services that will be provided by the partner institutions to host doctoral candidatesdescribe the extent to which the EMJD programme is organised in a structured and integrated way. Describe the language policy of the consortium. What administrative arrangements are foreseen for the award of the fellowships (including health care, social security and pension rights) and the distribution of the fellowship holders among the EMJD partners? Describe the measures taken by the consortium to ensure the candidate s career prospects and to monitor his/her career development once graduated. Describe the nature and comprehensiveness of the Doctoral Candidate Agreement.
B.5 Programme managmeent and quality assurance Describe the quality of the organisational arrangements and cooperation mechanisms within the consortium and the specific role played by each of its members. Describe the way the EMJD will be managed from a financial point of view and explain how the participations costs in the joint programme have been calculated; if differences exist between third-country and European candidates, what are the reasons for such differences? Describe how the consortium's development and sustainability plan is designed in order to ensure the proper implementation and continuity of the joint programme beyond Community funding and present the Consortium's proposed actions for complementary funding Describe the nature of the internal evaluation (by the institutions themselves? through candidates/scholars feed-back systems? etc.) and external quality assessment (by e.g. national, international or professional bodies) envisaged.
Przygotowanie wspólnych studiów Pomysł Grupa realizująca (konsorcjum) Szkic programu kształcenia i propozycja jego wykonawców Sprawdzenie poprawności pomysłu z regulacjami uczelnianymi i krajowymi (JM Rektor, Dziekan, Dział Kształcenia/ Toku Studiów sprawdzenie poprawności programu kształcenia oraz sposobu jego udokumentowania) Przygotowanie szczegółowego programu kształcenia (na podstawie ustaleń z konsorcjum) do zatwierdzenia przez odpowiednie władze uczelni REALIZACJA (przy stałej współpracy z działami odpowiedzialnymi za tok studiów i jego udokumentowanie)
Polecane regulacje prawne (1) Ustawa Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym tekst jednolity po wejściu w życie wszystkich przepisów ustawy z dnia 18 marca 2011 r. Dział IV (studia i studenci), rozdział 1 organizacja studiów, rozdział 3 studia doktoranckie. Rozporządzenie MNiSW z 5 października 2011 r. w sprawie warunków prowadzenia studiów na określonym kierunku i poziomie kształcenia Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 1 września 2011 r. w sprawie kształcenia na studiach doktoranckich w uczelniach i jednostkach naukowych Rozporządzenie MNiSW z 14 września 2011 r. w sprawie dokumentacji przebiegu studiów
Polecane regulacje prawne (2) Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 8 sierpnia 2011 r. w sprawie obszarów wiedzy, dziedzin nauki i sztuki oraz dyscyplin naukowych i artystycznych Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 1 września w sprawie tytułów zawodowych nadawanych absolwentom studiów, warunków wydawania oraz niezbędnych elementów dyplomów ukończenia studiów i świadectw ukończenia studiów podyplomowych oraz wzoru suplementu do dyplomu. Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 29 września 2011 r. w sprawie warunków oceny programowej i oceny instytucjonalnej
Polecane publikacje Jak przygotować programy kształcenia zgodnie z wymaganiami krajowych ram kwalifikacji dla szkolnictwa wyższego? Autor prof. Andrzej Kraśniewski, wydawca MNiSW Tuning Eucational Structures in Europe. A guide top formulating degree programme profiles including programme competences and programme learning outcomes. (Tuning association) Salzburg II recommendations. European Universities achievements since 2005 in implementing the Salzburg prionciples. - Euroean University Association Handbook of excellent higher-education practice - interactive tool to assess your own course http://www.emqa.eu
Seminaria Wspólne studia jako skuteczna forma umiędzynarodowienia i uatrakcyjnienia kształcenia. Przygotowanie i realizacja wspólnych studiów na przykładzie programu Erasmus Mundus. 8 i 29 lutego 2012 r. Dalsze pytania, potrzeba konsultacji? Agencja Wykonawcza w Brukseli: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus_mundus/index_en.php Krajowe biuro programu Erasmus Mudnus http://www.mundus.org.pl Dziękuję za uwagę