Contemporary Economics Quarterly of University of Fance and Management Warsaw Volume Issue 4 November 201 SOCIAL DIAGNOSIS 201 OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE QUALITY OF LIFE IN POLAND DIAGNOZA SPOŁECZNA 201 WARUNKI I JAKOŚĆ ŻYCIA POLAKÓW Edited by: Janusz Czapiński Tomasz Panek Raport Diagnoza Społeczna 201 fansowany przez: Warszawa: Rada Monitorgu Społecznego listopad 201
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS ABSTRACTED/INDEXED: ABI/INFORM Complete (ProQuest) ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest) Academic OneFile (GALE Science Busess & Company Profiles (GALE Science Busess and Economics Theory Collection (GALE Science Cabell s Directories Central and Eastern European Onle Library CEJSH Citefactor Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Directory of Research Journal Indexg (DRJI) ERIH PLUS EBSCO ECONIS EconLit EconPapers EconStor (EconBiz) GENAMICS JournalSeek General Busess File ASAP (GALE Science Google Scholar GREENR - Gale Resource on the Environment, Energy and Natural Resources (GALE Science IDEAS IndexCopernicus Infotrac Custom Journals (GALE Science International Busess (GALE Science JIFACTOR Library of Congress (USA) Mistry of Science and Higher Education list of scored journals (ratg score 10 pts) ProQuest Central ProQuest Research Library Research Papers Economics (RePEc) Scirus SCOPUS Science Research Network The British Library The Central European Journal of Sciences and Humanities The International Bibliography of the Sciences (IBSS)/ProQuest Ulrichsweb WorldCat Zetoc Editor Chief: Marc Staniewski Deputy Editor Chief Tomasz Szopiński Stat Editor Henryk Rosłaniec Language Editor Kurt Spurlock Technical Editors Monika Bandyszewska Karol Kowalczyk Associate Editors Zenon Biek Wiesław Dębski Witold Jakóbik Witold Małecki Danuta Mliczewska Robert Nowacki Włodzimierz Rembisz Grażyna Rytelewska Maria Sierpińska Piotr Szczepankowski Tadeusz Szumlicz Ryszard Wilczyński EDITORIAL BOARD: Nur Adiana Hiau Abdullah (Malaysia) Ruth V. Aguilera (USA) Icek Ajzen (USA) Hrabr Bachev (Bulgaria) Richard P. Bagozzi (USA) Richard Blundell (Great Brita) Constant A. Bob (Romania) Udo Broll (Germany) Willem K. M. Brauers (Belgium) Tanja Broz (Croatia) Jelena Budak (Croatia) Barbara Czarniawska (Sweden) Didar Erdç (Bulgaria) József Fogarasi (Romania) Nicolai Juul Foss (Denmark) Bruno S. Frey (Switzerland) Masahiko Gemma (Japan) Srećko Goić (Croatia) Kjell Åge Gotvassli (Norway) Adriana Grigorescu (Romania) Oliver D. Hart (USA) Roman Horvath (Czech Republic) Shelby D. Hunt (USA) Zoran Ivanovic (Croatia) Søren Johansen (Denmark) Sten Jönsson (Sweden) Lutz Kilian (USA) Judit Karsai (Hungary) Elko Kleschmidt (Canada) Monika Kostera (Sweden) Stephen F. LeRoy (USA) Csaba Lentner (Hungary) Lena Malešević Perović (Croatia) Victor Martez Reyes (USA) Eric Mask (USA) Igor Matunović (Croatia) Ieva Meidute (Lithuania) Garabed Massian (Bulgaria) Alexandru Mircea Nedelea (Romania) Anayo Nkamnebe (Nigeria) Harald Oberhofer (Austria) Boris Podobnik (Croatia) Na Pološki Vokić (Croatia) Rossitsa Rangelova (Bulgaria) Assaf Raz (USA) Sanda Renko (Croatia) Domgo Enrique Ribeiro Soriano (Spa) Richard Roll (USA) Steven Rosefielde (USA) Yochanan Shachmurove (USA) Andrei Shleifer (USA) Eduardo Schwartz (USA) Mirosław Skibniewski (USA) Stanley F. Slater (USA) Lenka Slavíková (Czech Republic) Joel Sobel (USA) Jasmka Sohger (Croatia) Miemie Struwig (South Africa) Guido Tabelli (Italy) Masahiro Taguchi (Japan) Josip Tica (Croatia) Joachim Wagner (Germany) John Whalley (Canada) Gary Wong (Cha) Shaker A. Zahra (USA) Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas (Lithuania) The origal version: on-le journal ADDRESS OF EDITORS: CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, University of Fance and Management Warsaw, 01 00 Warszawa, Pawia Str., room 2, phone: (22) 6 4 e-mail: editorial@ce.vizja.pl www.ce.vizja.pl PUBLISHER: Vizja Press & IT, 01 02 Warszawa, 60 Dzielna Str. phone/fax: (22) 6 4 68 e-mail: vizja@vizja.pl www.vizja.net.pl All articles published the quarterly are subject to double-bld peer reviews ISSN: 2084-084
Diagnosis 201 48 Please use the followg citation when referrg to this chapter: Panek, T., Czapiński, J. (201). Household livg conditions. Nutrition. Diagnosis 201, The Objective and Subjective Quality Of Life In Poland. Contemporary Economics, /4, 48-0. DOI:10.0/ce.18-24.180 4.2. Nutrition Tomasz Panek, Janusz Czapiński 1 2 1 Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Statistics and Demography; 2 University of Fance and Management Warsaw, Faculty of Psychology Abstract Durg the last four years, there has been a change the level of satisfaction of needs of households all groups of food products with the exception of sugar. 4.2.1. Situation 201 and its changes over the last four years In March/June, households stated that most often they could not afford, for fancial reasons, to satisfy their nutritional needs for fish or fish products (almost 1%), stimulants and confectionaries (almost %) and meat and poultry and meat and poultry products (over 8% case of both). Over the last four years the level of household need satisfaction all grocery item groups with the exception of sugar (Figure 4.2.1). Moreover, 20-201 we observed an improvg situation of households maly case of fruits and fruit products (the fall the share of households unable, for fancial reasons, to satisfy their needs this respect was over p.p.). stimulants (coffees, tea, alcohol, cigaretts),8 1,8 1,6 sweets, 1,8 16,4 sugar dairy products milk butter and other oils 2,,4 6, 4, 6,, 2,6 4,4 4,6,, 6,1 201 20 fish and fish products 16, 20,, meat and poultry 8,8,,4 meat (cludg poultry),1 1,1, fuit and fruit products, 10,, vegetables and vegetable products 4, 6,,0 0,0,0 10,0 1,0 20,0 2,0 0,0 % of households Figure 4.2.1. Scope of unsatisfied household needs for food items for fancial reasons the 20 201 panel The household groups that were most frequently unable to afford purchasg food items March/June 201 were those livg on unearned sources (for the followg abovementioned grocery items respectively: over 8%, approx. 2%, approx. 4%, over 0% and approx. 2% of these households) and pensioners (over %, approx. 21%, over 2%, approx. 20% and over 20% respectively). Incomplete family households most frequently dicated a lack of fancial means to purchase the selected article groups. This group dicated the followg items as the ones it had to forgo for fancial reasons most often as around over 2%, nearly %, nearly 18%, nearly 16% and nearly 16% of households, respectively). The next type of household that most often could not afford the dicated grocery items were sgle-person non-family households with over21%, nearly 1%, 1%, over 1% and % of households respectively. All household types generally noted an improvement fancial capacity to satisfy grocery item needs over the last four years.. An improvement the situation can be observed all groups of foodstuffs which were distguished the study. The percentage of households with unemployed members unable to purchase, for fancial reasons, groceries of all analysed item groups was February/March significantly higher than the group All All changes changes terms terms of of meetg meetg households' households' nutritional nutritional needs needs 20-201 20-201 referred referred to to the the panel panel from from those those years, years, i.e. i.e. households households analysed analysed 20, 20, and and 201.. 201.. Monitorg Monitorg Monitorg
Diagnosis 201 4 without unemployed members. The household groups below reported the need to forgo purchase most frequently of the respective grocery item groups as follows: nearly 0% and around 1%, nearly 22% and over %, nearly 22% and approx. %, over % and over% and over 1% and over % of households. Over the last four years, the situation has improved markedly both household groups and at the same time almost all grocery article groups. In March/June 201, households most frequently were forced to forgo purchase, for fancial reasons, of selected grocery items, resided above all rural areas (nearly 18%, nearly %, nearly %, over 10, and over % of households declared this situation for each of the previously mentioned grocery item groups) and smaller towns with 20-100 thousand residents over 1%, over 1%, over 10%, nearly 10% and 10% of households, respectively).. The highest percentage of households declarg fancial problems satisfyg needs for the selected grocery item groups occurred the month of study 201 Warmińsko-Mazurskie (approx. %, 16%, %, 1% and % of households respectively) and Podkarpackie (around %, %, 1%, %., and 10%of households, respectively). From March to March 201, there was a marked decrease households unable, for fancial reasons, to satisfy their grocery needs all classes of places of residence and all groups of food products. Regionally, only the Silesian Voivodship and only for fish and fish products was there a marked deterioration of the situation the study period (by nearly 2 p.p.). In 201, around 4% of households believed that the level of satisfaction of their grocery needs had not changed comparison to two years before. Around 1% reported a deterioration and around % an improvement. In relation to ratgs from, there was a significant decrease negative ratgs (by nearly p.p.) of these changes together with an crease positive ones (by 2 p.p Households that most frequently declared changes for the worse were those livg on unearned sources at over % of households and households of pensioners (over 2%). Among the households that felt a deterioration terms of nutrition were above complete families (over 24%,) as well as non-family multiperson households (over 20% of households from this group). Negative ratgs of change the satisfaction of nutritional needs were markedly more often formulated the group of households with unemployed member than the group without unemployed (almost 0% and over 1% households from this group respectively). The variability of households declarg a deterioration nutritional need level of satisfaction was significant terms of place of residence class. These households occurred most frequently small towns of 20 to 100 thousand habitants and big cities of 200-00 thousand habitants (almost % of households from these categories). Households Łódzkie, Podkarpackie and Lubelskie most frequently reported a fall their nutritional need satisfaction level (almost 22% and over 21% and almost 21% of households, respectively). 4.2.2. The change nutritional needs satisfaction from 2000 to 201 Over the last 1 years, the share of households unable to afford, for fancial reasons, grocery items regard all groups (Figure 4.2.2). The greatest decrease concerns stimulants (4 times), confectionary (4. times), fruit and fruit products (4times), meat and poultry as well as meat and poultry products (2. times) and fish and fish products (2 times). These were the same food items households most often could not afford the previous years. Monitorg
Diagnosis 201 0 stimulants (coffees, tea, alcohol, cigaretts) sweets sugar dairy products milk butter and other oils fish and fish products meat and poultry meat (cludg poultry) fuit and fruit products vegetables and vegetable products 6 4 4 6 1 1 18 1 16 1 16 1 21 8 2 8 1 1 2 10 1 20 1 1 1 1 0 2 4 46 201 20 200 200 2000 0 10 20 0 40 0 60 % of households Figure 4.2.2. Percentage of households which could not afford the purchase of sufficient quantities of various food products the 20 201 whole s Monitorg