DAILY ACTIVITY OF COWS IN A HERD CHAROLAIS



Podobne dokumenty
Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica 11 (3) 2012, 41 48

INSTYTUT GENETYKI I HODOWLI ZWIERZĄT POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK W JASTRZĘBCU. mgr inż. Ewa Metera-Zarzycka

PORÓWNANIE WYNIKÓW OCENY UŻYTKOWOŚCU CZYSTORASOWEJ I MIESZAŃCOWEJ POPULACJI FRANCUSKICH RAS BYDŁA MIĘSNEGO

Is there a relationship between age and side dominance of tubal ectopic pregnancies? A preliminary report

Cracow University of Economics Poland. Overview. Sources of Real GDP per Capita Growth: Polish Regional-Macroeconomic Dimensions

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

MULTI-MODEL PROJECTION OF TEMPERATURE EXTREMES IN POLAND IN

Unit of Social Gerontology, Institute of Labour and Social Studies ageing and its consequences for society

Has the heat wave frequency or intensity changed in Poland since 1950?

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

EFFECT OF CERTAIN FACTORS ON THE LONGEVITY AND CULLING OF COWS

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

INFLUENCE OF SELECTED FACTORS ON MATERNAL NURSING PERFORMANCE OF ABERDEEN ANGUS CALVES

Stargard Szczecinski i okolice (Polish Edition)

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Charakterystyka innych ras czerwonych w Europie zrzeszonych w ERDB

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Sargent Opens Sonairte Farmers' Market

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

OCENA MOśLIWOŚCI WYKORZYSTANIA HODOWLI ŚWIŃ RASY ZŁOTNICKIEJ

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica 10 (4) 2011, 31 40

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Nauka Przyroda Technologie

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

ANALYSIS OF THE NUMBER OF COW VISITS TO THE MILKING ROBOT

COMPARISON OF RED ANGUS AND HEREFORD PRIMIPAROUS COWS BASED ON THE PRODUCTION PARAMETERS

FOLIA POMERANAE UNIVERSITATIS TECHNOLOGIAE STETINENSIS Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin., Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 2017, 338(44)4, 21 26


Cracow University of Economics Poland

SYSTEM KONSTRUKCYJNY BUDYNKU A RYZYKO WYSTĄPIENIA STRESU TERMICZNEGO U KRÓW MLECZNYCH

Karpacz, plan miasta 1:10 000: Panorama Karkonoszy, mapa szlakow turystycznych (Polish Edition)

Rozpoznawanie twarzy metodą PCA Michał Bereta 1. Testowanie statystycznej istotności różnic między jakością klasyfikatorów

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

THE COMPARISON OF YIELD, COMPOSITION AND QUALITY OF COW MILK DEPENDING ON TWICE-A-DAY AND FOUR-TIMES-A-DAY MILKING

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

56 Edyta Gajos, STOWARZYSZENIE Sylwia MałażewskaEKONOMISTÓW ROLNICTWA I AGROBIZNESU

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

SSW1.1, HFW Fry #20, Zeno #25 Benchmark: Qtr.1. Fry #65, Zeno #67. like

FOLIA POMERANAE UNIVERSITATIS TECHNOLOGIAE STETINENSIS Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin., Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 2017, 338(44)4, 27 32

Zakopane, plan miasta: Skala ok. 1: = City map (Polish Edition)

SPIS TABEL. POLSKA FEDERACJA HODOWCÓW BYDŁA i PRODUCENTÓW MLEKA

MaPlan Sp. z O.O. Click here if your download doesn"t start automatically

EFFECT OF EXTENDED LACTATIONS ON MILK AND REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF COWS. Małgorzata Jankowska, Wojciech Neja, Sylwia Krężel-Czopek

KOMPLEKSOWA OCENA STANDARDÓW TECHNOLOGICZNYCH ORAZ MODUŁÓW BUDOWLANYCH W CHOWIE BYDŁA

Ocena skuteczności preparatów miejscowo znieczulających skórę w redukcji bólu w trakcie pobierania krwi u dzieci badanie z randomizacją

Charakterystyka kliniczna chorych na raka jelita grubego

TRANSPORT W RODZINNYCH GOSPODARSTWACH ROLNYCH


SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Analiza porównawcza zmian w rozbiorach wody z uwzględnieniem sposobu jej dostarczania do odbiorców

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

GLOBAL METHANE INITIATIVE PARTNERSHIP-WIDE MEETING Kraków, Poland

Akademia Morska w Szczecinie. Wydział Mechaniczny

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Fizyka Procesów Klimatycznych Wykład 11 Aktualne zmiany klimatu: atmosfera, hydrosfera, kriosfera

THE CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MILK YIELD OF GOATS AND SOME MILK NUTRIENT CONTENT DURING A 3- AND 5-MONTH LACTATION AND A FULL LACTATION

CONFORMATION ASSESSMENT OF CHAROLAISE COWS AND CROSSBREDS WITH VARIOUS PROPORTIONS OF GENES OF THIS BREED

Egzamin maturalny z języka angielskiego na poziomie dwujęzycznym Rozmowa wstępna (wyłącznie dla egzaminującego)

WYNIKI OCENY WARTOŚCI UŻYTKOWEJ KRÓW MLECZNYCH SPIS TABEL

ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁODOWSKA LUBLIN POLONIA

ROZPRAWY NR 128. Stanis³aw Mroziñski

DOBROSTAN ZWIERZĄT W POLSKICH GOSPODARSTWACH MLECZNYCH. Edyta Gajos

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Radiologiczna ocena progresji zmian próchnicowych po zastosowaniu infiltracji. żywicą o niskiej lepkości (Icon). Badania in vivo.

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

EFEKTY WYKORZYSTANIA TECHNOLOGII INFORMACYJNO-MONITORUJĄCYCH W ANALIZIE ZACHOWANIA KRÓW MLECZNYCH

Streszczenie rozprawy doktorskiej

Wojewodztwo Koszalinskie: Obiekty i walory krajoznawcze (Inwentaryzacja krajoznawcza Polski) (Polish Edition)

Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf 49 (2006) Special Issue, Department of Cattle Breeding, University of Technology and Agriculture, Bydgoszcz, Poland

Machine Learning for Data Science (CS4786) Lecture11. Random Projections & Canonical Correlation Analysis

DOI: / /32/37

deep learning for NLP (5 lectures)

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

The Overview of Civilian Applications of Airborne SAR Systems

SPITSBERGEN HORNSUND

Katowice, plan miasta: Skala 1: = City map = Stadtplan (Polish Edition)

ARNOLD. EDUKACJA KULTURYSTY (POLSKA WERSJA JEZYKOWA) BY DOUGLAS KENT HALL


HemoRec in Poland. Summary of bleeding episodes of haemophilia patients with inhibitor recorded in the years 2008 and /2010

FOLIA POMERANAE UNIVERSITATIS TECHNOLOGIAE STETINENSIS Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin., Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 2014, 310(30), 35 42

The effect of the season of farrowing on selected performance traits in Pulawska sows

Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica 9 (4) 2010,

The impact of the global gravity field models on the orbit determination of LAGEOS satellites

FOLIA POMERANAE UNIVERSITATIS TECHNOLOGIAE STETINENSIS Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin., Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 2014, 312(31), 39 48

FOLIA POMERANAE UNIVERSITATIS TECHNOLOGIAE STETINENSIS Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin., Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech. 2016, 325(37)1, 5 12

BODY WEIGHT CHARACTERISTICS OF FARM-RAISED FALLOW DEER (DAMA DAMA L.) OVER THE WINTER PERIOD

Zmienność cech rozpłodowych w rasach matecznych loch w latach

Raport bieżący: 44/2018 Data: g. 21:03 Skrócona nazwa emitenta: SERINUS ENERGY plc

Emilka szuka swojej gwiazdy / Emily Climbs (Emily, #2)

XT001_ INTRODUCTION TO EXIT INTERVIEW PYTANIE NIE JEST ZADAWANE W POLSCE W 2006 ROKU. WCIŚNIJ Ctrl+R BY PRZEJŚĆ DALEJ. 1.

THE EFFECT OF DAIRY CATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ON MILK YIELD, COMPOSITION AND SOMATIC CELL COUNT

Evaluation of the main goal and specific objectives of the Human Capital Operational Programme

Chów bydła mięsnego w gospodarstwie ekologicznym Glinna ZD IZ PIB Kołbacz

Analysis of Hereford beef cattle recording results in Poland

С R A C OV I E N S I A


EGARA Adam Małyszko FORS. POLAND - KRAKÓW r

Transkrypt:

Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica 11 (4) 2012, 3 10 DAILY ACTIVITY OF COWS IN A HERD CHAROLAIS Mariusz Bogucki, Anna Sawa, Wojciech Neja, Adam Oler, Maciej Ziemer University of Technology and Live Science in Bydgoszcz Abstract. This study analysed basic forms of behaviour in Charolais cows with regard to season of the year and day. It was found that in each season, resting cows preferred lying on the left side, from 19.7% of the day in summer to 27.6% in winter. Animals rested on the right side slightly less often: 14.0% and 24.7% of the day, respectively. Cows spent most time on feed intake in summer (36.2% of the day) and least time in winter (19.7%). Standing position was most frequent in autumn (31.6% of the day) and least frequent in winter (28%). Water intake by the cows was most frequent during summer, averaging 4.8 times per day. By far the most frequently, cows rested in the lying position during the night. Animals spent from 57.8% to 78.9% of the total feeding time on lying down in summer and winter, respectively. Key words: behavioural observations, cattle, Charolais INTRODUCTION Animal behaviour has been the subject of many observations and detailed studies. Already in the 4th century BC, Aristotle described social hierarchy in a herd of cattle. Animal behaviour is defined in scientific literature as a pattern of activities that are voluntary or instinctive [Sablik et al. 2010]. This notion is inextricably linked to ethology, which deals with observation of individual animals or groups of animals in their environment. Nowicki and Zwolińska-Bartczak [1983] define ethology as the science which seeks to determine patterns in complex forms of Corresponding author Adres do korespondencji: dr inż. Mariusz Bogucki, University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz, Department of Cattle Breeding, Mazowiecka 28, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland, e-mail: bogucki@utp.edu.pl

4 M. Bogucki et al. animal response to environmental stimuli. Ethological studies should fall within the scope of tasks for ensuring welfare in new technological systems while maintaining the high productivity of animals [Neja and Bogucki 2006, 2007]. The behaviour of beef cattle, especially those raised in Poland, has received little study. The aim of this study was to analyse basic forms of behaviour in Charolais cows raised in a farm located in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie province. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was carried out on a farm located in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie province, Poland. Behavioural observations were made on 15 Charolais cows (2.5 to 6 years of age), performance recorded by the Polish Association of Beef Cattle Breeders and Producers. For easy identification, cows were individually marked with numbers on their backs. Three 24-hour observations were made over 3 successive days in each season of the year. During observations, the following activities were recorded at 15-minute intervals: standing and walking, lying on the left side, lying on the right side, eating, and water drinking. During the tests, the observers kept their distance from the animals to avoid interference with their behaviour. Cattle acclimated to the observer s presence for one day in each season. Cows remained on pasture throughout the year, without overhead protective shelter. Pasture had an area of about 2 ha and was divided into 3 paddocks. Feeding was done twice daily. Cows were supplemented with maize silage during the summer period and with maize silage, haylage and straw in the winter. Animals were allowed continuous access to water from an automatic drinker. The statistical analysis included the calculation of the mean duration of individual activities performed by the cows with regard to season of the year (spring, summer, autumn, winter) and time of day or night. The numerical data were analysed statistically with two-way analysis of variance and significant differences between the means were determined using Duncan s multiple range test [Statistica 8 2008]. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The data presented in Table 1 indicate that in each season of the year, cows preferred to be in a left lateral recumbency when resting, from 284 minutes (19.7% of the day) in the summer to 398 minutes (27.6% of the day) in winter months. Animals spent slightly less time resting on the right side, from 201 minutes (14.0% of Acta Sci. Pol.

Daily activity of cows in a herd Charolais 5 the day) in the summer to 355 minutes (24.7% of the day) in the winter. Compared to other seasons of the year, in winter cows spent significantly more time resting, both on the left and right side. Table 1. Proportion of time cows spent on different activities according to season of the year and time of day Tabela 1. Czas wykonywania poszczególnych czynności przez krowy w zależności od pory roku i pory doby Activity Czynność Left lateral recumbency, minutes per day Leżenie na lewym boku, minut/dobę Right lateral recumbency, minutes per day Leżenie na prawym boku, minut/dobę Feed intake, minutes per day Pobieranie paszy, minut/dobę Standing and walking, minutes per day Stanie i chodzenie, minut/dobę Season of the year Pora roku Spring Wiosna Summer Lato Autumn Jesień Winter Zima N cows N krów 15 15 15 15 x %* SD x % SD x % SD x % SD 292 A (20.3) 158 284 B (19.7) 237 286 C (19.9) 163 398 ABC (27.6) 237 80 (27.4) 72 84 (29.6) 64 64 (22.4) 58 93 (23.4) 69 212 A (72.6) 153 200 B (70.4) 118 222 C (77.6) 150 305 ABC (76.6) 224 286 (19.9) 160 201 AD (14.0) 234 207 BE (14.4) 153 355 CDE (24.7) 234 100 (35.0) 76 80 (39.8) 64 67 (32.4) 63 98 (27.6) 67 186 (65.0) 146 121 (60.2) 101 140 (67.6) 135 257 (72.4) 222 435 A (30.2) 61 522 B (36.2) 61 492 C (34.1) 84 284 ABC (19.7) 42 297 (68.3) 66 302 (57.8) 42 315 (64.0) 47 224 (78.9) 35 138 (31.7) 61 220 (42.2) 37 177 (36.0) 71 60 (21.1) 22 427 (29.6) 66 433 (30.1) 59 455 (31.6) 63 403 (28.0) 52 244 (57.1) 49 254 (58.7) 49 272 (59.8) 46 284 (70.5) 39 183 (42.9) 47 179 (41.3) 37 183 (40.2) 41 119 (29.5) 40 *% day % doby. A, B, C Means within lines followed by the same letters differ significantly at P 0.01. A, B, C Średnie w wierszach oznaczone tymi samymi literami różnią się istotnie statystycznie przy P 0,01. It is evident from the data in Table 1 that lying on the left side occupied most of the animals time during winter nights (305 minutes) and the least of their time during summer nights (201 minutes). During the day in winter, cows were in a left lateral recumbency for 93 minutes, which was the longest resting time in this position compared to the other seasons. Cows spent the least time resting on the left side in the autumn (64 minutes). The investigated animals were found to spend most of their time lying on the right side during winter nights (257 minutes per day), and the least time lying in this position during summer nights (121 minutes per day). When analysing lying on the right side during the day, it was found that Zootechnica 11 (4) 2012

6 M. Bogucki et al. cows most often assumed this posture in winter (100 minutes per day on average) compared to only 67 minutes per day in autumn (Table 1). Similar results concerning the cows preference for lying on the left side were reported by Neja and Bogucki [2005], who found that animals spent more time resting on the left side in both tie-stall and free-stall barns. Another study demonstrated that Aberdeen Angus cows spent over 80 minutes more lying on the right side than on the left side [Neja et al. 2009]. Neja et al. [2006] showed that cows in a free-stall barn spent 741 minutes (51.5% of the day) lying down. According to Romaniuk and Overby [2004], during a 24-hour period an adult cow generally lies down for 10 14 hours, divided into 15 20 periods. Lying time in cows depends on the type of bedding. In a study cited by Szarek et al. [2010], cows spent most of their time lying in loose boxes on sawdust bedding (656 minutes), followed by lying in a deep-pit open barn with chopped straw bedding (633 minutes) and lying in loose boxes bedded with straw (504 minutes). Charolais cattle spent most of their time feeding during the summer period (36.2% or 522 minutes/day). Winter was the period when cows spent significantly less time feeding (19.7% or 284 minutes per day) compared to the other seasons. According to Zwolińska-Bartczak [1992], low air temperature and strong winds in winter months reduce the rate of feed consumption. In a study by Neja et al. [2006], Polish Holstein-Friesian cows had an average feeding rate of 260 minutes (18.1% of the day) in a tie-stall barn and 301 minutes (20.9% of the day) in a free- -stall barn. Meanwhile Szarek et al. [2010], who analysed basic behavioural responses of dairy cows, showed that cattle spend about 7 hours/day eating pasture. As shown in Table 1, the investigated animals spent most time standing in the autumn (455 minutes/day or 31.6%) and least time standing in the winter (an average of 403 minutes per day or 28%). Sablik et al. [2010] concluded that cattle spend more time resting combined with ruminating. Neja and Bogucki [2006] reported literature data which showed lying time in cows to range from 44 to 65% of the day depending on age, breed, body weight and housing system. Based on the data presented in Table 1, cows most often ingested feed during the daytime. They spent an average of 315 minutes per day feeding in the autumn, slightly less time in the summer, and the least time in the winter (224 minutes per day). During the nighttime hours, the animals under study were much less active and spent 220 minutes feeding in the spring and only 60 minutes per day in the winter. Research completed to date has also shown that duration of feeding is determined by season of the year [Bogucki et al. 2008]. Cows spend 56 76% of their Acta Sci. Pol.

Daily activity of cows in a herd Charolais 7 pasture time grazing. Cows are more active eating pasture in the morning, in the afternoon, and before the evening. Around noon, the rate of feed consumption decreases due to higher air temperature [Zwolińska-Bartczak 1992]. When observing the behaviour of cows on pasture, Porzig [1966] distinguished 4 grazing periods, including 3 during the day and 1 at night. During the day, cows were standing and moving from 244 minutes in the spring to 284 minutes in the winter. At nighttime, the same activity in the spring, summer and autumn was between 179 and 183 minutes long. Again, during the night, cows spent the least time standing (119 minutes) in winter (Table 1). Sablik et al. [2010] reported that activities in the investigated animals consisted predominantly of eating and moving, which accounted for more than 70% of the observation time. Table 2 characterizes the frequency of water drinking by the cows according to the season. Cows most often drank water in the summer (4.8 times per day on average). During the autumn, this frequency was smaller at 4 times per day. Charolais cows drank an average of 3.4 times per day in the spring and 2.8 times per day in the winter period. Season of the year created statistically significant differences in water drinking frequency. During the day, cattle most often drank water in the summer (2.8 times per day on average). Water drinking during the day was least frequent in the winter (1.8 times per day). Also during nighttime, cows drank water much more frequently in the summer than in the winter (twice vs. once a day). Table 2. Frequency of water intake by the cows according to season of the year and time of day Tabela 2. Częstotliwość pobierania wody przez krowy w zależności od pory roku i pory doby Activity Czynność Water intake Pobieranie wody Season of the year Pora roku Spring Wiosna Summer Lato Autumn Jesień Winter Zima N cows N krów 15 15 15 15 x SD x SD x SD x SD 3.4 AB 1.3 4.8 AC 1.4 4.0 BD 1.5 2.8 ACD 1.3 2.0 0.9 2.8 1.1 2.4 1.2 1.8 1.1 1.4 0.9 2.0 1.0 1.6 0.9 1.0 0.7 A, B, C Means within lines followed by the same letters differ significantly at P 0.01. A, B, C Średnie w wierszach oznaczone tymi samymi literami różnią się istotnie statystycznie przy P 0,01. Grodzki et al. [2009] observed that meeting the water requirements is often undervalued as a dietary component. An inadequate water intake has more ne- Zootechnica 11 (4) 2012

8 M. Bogucki et al. gative consequences than a deficiency of protein and energy, because inadequate amounts of water limit feed intake. Daily water requirement of cows varies from several dozen to several hundred dozen litres depending on the type of feed, air temperature and humidity, and milk yield. CONCLUSIONS The observed cows spent more time eating, standing and moving than resting lying. In each season of the year, animals showed a preference for lying on the left side. Animals spent most of their time eating in the summer (36.2%) and the least time in the winter (19.7%). Cows most often drank water in the summer (4.8 times per day compared to 2.8 times per day during the winter). Animals spent much more time resting lying during the night hours. During the day, animals spent 57.8 to 78.9% of their time feeding (summer and winter, respectively). Season of the year created statistically significant differences in the frequency of different activities performed by the cows. REFERENCES Bogucki M., Neja W., Pepliński K., 2008. Zachowanie się krów w oborze wolnostanowiskowej w zależności od pory roku i pory dnia [Behaviour of loose-housed cows depending on season and time of day]. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 4 (4), 177 183 [in Polish]. Grodzki H., Nawrocki L., Przysucha T., Konopka B., Grodzki G., 2009. Chów bydła mięsnego [Beef cattle farming]. Wielkopolskie Wydaw. Rol., PZHiPBM, 18 92 [in Polish]. Neja W., Bogucki M., 2005. Wpływ systemu utrzymania oborowego na wybrane cechy zachowania się krów [Effect of the maintenance on the selected behaviour traits of cows]. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 1 (supl. 1), 63 68 [in Polish]. Neja W., Bogucki M., 2006. Jak zachowują się krowy? [How do cows behave?]. Hoduj z głową. Bydło 1 2, 57 58 [in Polish]. Neja W., Sawa A., Bogucki M., Fryca A., 2006. Aktywność dobowa krów mlecznych w warunkach chowu uwięziowego i wolnostanowiskowego [Circardian activity of dairy cows in tethered vs. loose housing system]. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 2 (3), 135 141 [in Polish]. Neja W., Bogucki M., 2007. Dlaczego warto obserwować bydło? [Why watch cattle?]. Hod. Bydła 2, 68 71 [in Polish]. Neja W., Bogucki M., Kowalski P., 2009. Aktywność dobowa bydła wybranych ras w zależności od częstotliwości podawania paszy [Twenty-four-hour activity of selected cattle breeds fed once or twice a day]. Rocz. Nauk. PTZ 5 (4), 267 274 [in Polish]. Acta Sci. Pol.

Daily activity of cows in a herd Charolais 9 Nowicki B., Zwolińska-Bartczak I., 1983. Zachowanie się zwierząt gospodarskich. Wprowadzenie. [An introduction to the behaviour of farm animals]. PWRiL Warszawa, 7 252 [in Polish]. Porzig E., 1966. Zachowanie się bydła na pastwisku [Behaviour of cows on pasture]. Prz. Hod. 5, 19 20 [in Polish]. Romaniuk W., Overby T., 2004. Systemy utrzymania bydła. Poradnik [A guide to cattle housing systems] Praca zbiorowa. Warszawa: Instytut Budownictwa, Mechanizacji i Elektryfikacji Rolnictwa; Duńskie Służby Doradztwa Rolniczego; 2004. 172 [in Polish]. Sablik P., Kobak P., Biała M., Matkowski D., 2010. Porównanie behawioryzmu udomowionych zwierząt roślinożernych (bydła mięsnego i koni) w naturalnych warunkach bytowania w otulinie przyrodniczego Parku Narodowego Ujście Warty [Comparison of behaviorism domesticated herbivores (beef cattle and horses) in natural living conditions in the buffer zone of natural national park Ujście Warty ]. Acta Sci. Pol., Zootechnica 9 (4), 207 214 [in Polish]. Statistica 8 PL, 2008. Szarek J., Nawrocki L., Kruczyńska H., Piech T., Kotowski K., 2010. Chów bydła mlecznego [Dairy cattle farming]. Wielkopolskie Wydaw. Rol., 295 [in Polish]. Zwolińska-Bartczak I., 1992. Genetyczne uwarunkowanie zachowania się zwierząt gospodarskich [Genetically determined behaviours of farm animals]. Pr. Mater. Zootech., Zesz. Spec. 1, 49 64 [in Polish]. AKTYWNOŚĆ DOBOWA STADA KRÓW RASY CHAROLAIS Streszczenie. Celem pracy była analiza podstawowych form zachowania krów rasy Charolaise z uwzględnieniem pory roku i doby, utrzymywanych całodobowo i całorocznie na pastwisku. Stwierdzono, że w każdej porze roku krowy preferowały wypoczynek w pozycji leżącej na lewym boku od 19,7% doby latem do 27,6% zimą. Nieco mniej czasu zwierzęta wypoczywały na prawym boku odpowiednio: 14,0% i 24,7% doby. Najwięcej czasu na pobieraniu paszy krowy spędzały latem 36,2% doby, a najmniej zimą 19,7%. W pozycji stojącej krowy najwięcej czasu spędzały jesienią (31,6% doby), a najmniej zimą (28% doby). Najczęściej krowy pobierały wodę w okresie lata średnio 4,8 razy w ciągu doby. Zdecydowanie więcej czasu na wypoczynek w pozycji leżącej krowy przeznaczały w godzinach nocnych. Z całkowitego czasu związanego z pobieraniem paszy zwierzęta na tę czynność w ciągu dnia przeznaczały od 57,8 do 78,9% czasu (odpowiednio latem i zimą). Słowa kluczowe: bydło, charolaise, obserwacje etologiczne Accepted for print Zaakceptowano do druku: 28.11.2012 Zootechnica 11 (4) 2012