Baltic Sea Region advancing towards Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning Gdynia, 23/10/2014 FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN SUMP lecture for the case of Gdynia Daniel Kaszubowski, Ph.D. Gdansk University of Technology Ernest Czermański, Ph.D. University of Gdansk
CASE of GDYNIA Background for the freight compliance into the SUMP 2
Main frieght flows within the city and related factors Types of urban freight traffic: Long disstance freight, Short disstance freight, Transit cargo, City deliveries, Retail logistics. Factors in urban freight transport: Volume and its seasonality, Density of freight traffic, Structure of directions of the traffic, Modal split and shifting possibility, Location on main corridors, equiped with transport nodes infrastructure 3
GDYNIA in international transport corridor network Source: ec.europe.eu 4
BSR MARITIME CONNECTIONS Source: baltictransportmaps.pl 5
GDYNIA in the Adriatic Baltic Corridor Source: adriatic-baltic.eu and the Gdynia-Karlskrona Motorway of the Sea Source: baltic-link.se 6
GDYNIA hinterland transport infrastructure Source: Bothnian Green Logistics Corridor, Gdynia 2014 A1 (to CZ) S 6 (to DE) DK/S 7 (to Warsaw) DK 20 DW 216, DW 100, DW 101 Estakada Kwiatkowskiego Source: googlemaps.com 7
Long distance freight factors influencing urban mobility: active harbour, esp. general and unitized cargo terminals (ro-ro, containers), logistic activities area, inland intermodal terminal and/or dry port, international routes junction with transhipmet function. Gdynia meets most of these elements! 8
Daily traffic Road 2005 2010 2020 DK 6 Rumia Gdynia DK 20 Gdynia Chwaszczyno 32 915 44 391 63 816 13 884 19 712 28 865 Gdynia - Osowa 35 185 38 604 54 885 Ul. Polska 6 700 6 800 17 500 Ul. Wiśniewskiego 23 300 46 100 56 500 Kontenerowa - Morska 9 350 20 400 66 000 77 000 46 910 n.a. n.a. Source: Bothnian Green Logistics Corridor, Gdynia 2014 9
Summarized port turover 1990 2013 in Gdynia * - in thousand of tons * - in thousand of TEU Source: K. Gromadowski, Gdynia 2014 10
Road container transport in Gdynia Thousands trucks yearly including empty runs Seasonality - monthly changes Source: I.Milewska, Gdynia 2014 11
Modal split for container traffic in the port of Gdynia case of Baltic Container Terminal 2009 13% rail (29.000 teu) 87% road (194.000 teu) 2013 41% rail (162.000 teu) 59% road (233.000 teu) Source: baltictransportmaps.pl 12
Estakada Kwiatkowskiego projection of the traffic development container turover daily road container traffic hourly trucks hourly estimation for whole traffic* thou. TEU/year total in 1 direction in 1 direction cars & trucks in 1 direction volume / capacity 400 1.900 950 100 400 0,11 1.000 4.800 2.400 240 960 0,27 3.000 14.000 7.000 700 2.00 0,80 by rail 41% 8.260 4.130 413 1.652 0,47 * - by the assumption of 3.500 vehicles hourly capacity in 1 direction Source: Bothnian Green Logistics Corridor, Gdynia 2014 13
Crucial roads for freight transport Estakada Kwiatkowskiego ul. Kontenerowa Source: Zarząd Dróg i Zieleni, Gdynia 2014 ul. Wiśniewskiego ul. Hutnicza ul. Logistyczna (proj.) OPAT (proj.) 14
Summarized road hinterland service for unitized cargo in the port of Gdynia for 2018 (trucks) Source: I.Milewska, Gdynia 2014 15
Urban freight planning 16
Issues in urban freight planning According to EU Urban Mobility Package particular attention should be paid to following areas: management of urban freight demand, modal shift, efficiency improvement, improved vehicles and fuels. 17
Selected problems in urban deliveries Potential threat for pedestrians and other groups of public space users 18
Violations of regulations 19
Intrusion into space reserved for other users 20
Measures Objectives and clusters of measures Objectives Reduction Optimization Mobility Sustainability Liveability Transfer 21
Urban freight policy objectives Mobility access to every form of economic activity different urban freight transport users requirements ability to make a modal choice if feasible support for innovations Sustainability UFT should support economic and spatial developmet reduction of an extensive utilization of infrastructure inclusion of all transport externalities into regulatory policy Liveability reduction of CO 2, noise and other emissions improvement of traffic safety rationalisation of city space design for convenient access to services, leisure, education for all users 22
Potential policy packages Optimization of freight vehicles flows and demand for infrastructure, objective: to alleviate the negative impacts of freight traffic and to induce changes in the characteristics of logistic operations Reduction Transfer of excessive demand for freight movements of urban freight flows to more sustainable modes (rail or waterborne) or introducing new vehicle types for road transport (electric, LPG). 23
Examples of measures Optimization provision of dedicated delivery spaces, road categorisation access regulations, night deliveries, delivery zones monitoring fleet management systems and vehicle routing Reduction delivery schemes zoning of freight related activities delivery and service plans Transfer low emission zones electric/hybrid vehicles 24
Requirements for implementation Optimization number of avilabe examples relatively easy to implement and integrate with existing measures concers freight traffic rather than supply chain good basis for more complex measures Reduction high potential for supply chains proper business case required close stakeholder cooperation required often rely on previously implemented measures potential for future innovative solutions Transfer limited number of examples requires strong regulatory support implemented as a part of complex planning concept private sector is essential proven technology and sound business case 25
Recommendations Urban freight should be incorporated into the SUMP increase of planners and decision makers awareness needs identification creation of relaible planning environment utilization of modern planning tools identification of local freight profile local stakerholders involvement measures identification definition of performance measures and evaluation criteria 26
Thank you! Daniel Kaszubowski Gdansk University of Technology 80-233 Gdańsk, Narutowicza 11/12 daniel.kaszubowski@pg.gda.pl Ernest Czermański University of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics 81-824 Sopot, Armii Krajowej 119/121 e.czermanski@gmail.com http://www.civitas.eu