6 combination service 1 ½ inch domestic maximum 8 combination service 2 inch domestic maximum

Transkrypt

1 12800 rbor Lakes Parkway, P.O. Box 1180, Maple Grove, MN FIRE-RESCUE DEPRTMENT Fire Operations Fire Prevention Fax Fax May 3, 2019 RE: Taco Bell Site Plan Review We have reviewed the proposed site plans for Taco Bell and have the following comments: 1. Combination Water Service Lines: In buildings where a high water usage is likely or when the maximum size of domestic water on combination fire sprinkler / domestic water line in the building exceeds 1/4 size of the water supply line, an electric solenoid valve shall be installed on the domestic side of the service, including the lawn sprinkler system. This valve shall be normally powered open and shall close on loss of electric power or signal from the automatic fire sprinkler system water flow indicator. Maple Grove City Code, Chapter 18, rticle III, Fire Prevention Code, FPB-Policy 3. e.g. 6 combination service 1 ½ inch domestic maximum 8 combination service 2 inch domestic maximum Comments: Plans show single 6 water main to the building. Building will require a fire sprinkler system. Confirm if this will be a combination fire sprinkler / domestic water service. If so, domestic water line will be limited to 1 ½ inches in size, including any lawn sprinkler system demand, with the proposed 6 combination service. Please indicate on the plan the size of the domestic service and if this will be a combination service. 2. Fire sprinkler water mains must be brought into a one-hour fire resistive room and must have exterior access, a drain, an emergency light pack, and a sidewalk to the public way. If the water main enters into a basement level the main may be extended to the first floor into a one-hour fire resistive room with the above requirements. If an undue hardship exists in meeting these requirements, a letter on company letterhead may be sent explaining the hard ship in detail and requesting one the following alternates shall be sent to the fire department to the attention of the deputy fire chief, fire prevention.. yard post indicator valve must be downstream from the domestic (at the point where the domestic and fire split, on the fire side) or provide a separate fire main. gate valve shall be installed on the domestic side. B. wall post indicator valve Yard post indicator valves and wall post indicator valves must meet requirements of NFP 24. Yard post indicator valves shall be located not less than 40 feet from the building. Exception: When post indicator valves cannot be placed at this distance, they shall be permitted to be located closer, or wall post indicator valves used, Serving Today, Shaping Tomorrow N EQUL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

2 Taco Bell Page 2 of 2 provided they are in locations by blank walls or located diagonally at a corner of the building were the possibility of injury by falling walls is unlikely and from which people are not likely to be driven away by smoke or heat. Installation shall be in accordance with NFP 24. Maple Grove City Code, Chapter 18, rticle III, Fire Prevention Code, FPB-Policy 3. Comments: Requirement not shown on plan. Please respond. 3. Fire Department Connection (FDC): The FDC shall be installed in accordance with the NFP standard applicable to the system design and shall comply with 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code, sections through The FDC shall be approved by the fire code official. Comments: Please identify on the plans the location of the FDC. The FDC must be visible to approaching fire apparatus, access maintained at all times, and unobstructed by fences, bushes, trees, walls, or any other fixed or movable object. Current location shown would potentially be obstructed by parked vehicles. FDC, keybox, and exterior horn strobe are required to be placed in the same vertical column above each other. 4. Water Flow Tests: New water flow tests shall be conducted for all new systems. Two hydrants shall be used which are closest to the property. The static pressure should be measured on the hydrant in front of / or nearest the property and the water allowed to flow from the next hydrant nearest the property, preferably the one farthest from the source of the supply if the feed is only one way. The residual pressure will be that indicated at the hydrant where the water is not flowing. representative from the Utility department shall be contacted prior to the test at The Fire Prevention Bureau shall be notified with the date, time and address of the flow test at least 12 hours in advance. Maple Grove City Code, Chapter 18, rticle III, Fire Prevention Code, FPB- Policy 3 & NFP 24, Section Location of Fire Hydrants and General Requirements:. Underground piping to be flushed and tested in accordance with NFP 24. Contractor's Material & Test Certificate for Underground Piping is required. NFP 24, Section B. Fire hydrants and other fire protection equipment must not be obstructed or the view of the equipment blocked. minimum clearance of five (5) feet shall be provided and maintained around fire hydrants and other fire protection equipment. The full anticipated growth of the trees and shrubs must be considered when planting. five (5) foot clearance must be provided when the landscaping reaches maturity. ny landscaping planted should be placed so it will meet the future clearance requirements at maturity. Maple Grove City Code, Chapter 18, rticle III, Fire Prevention Code, Section Comments: Understand these general requirements are applicable to the proposed building and will be reviewed for compliance. Please feel free to contact me by (wspiering@maplegrovemn.gov), phone ( ), or we can meet in person if you have any questions or need any clarifications. Sincerely, Wayne Spiering Fire Inspector Serving Today, Shaping Tomorrow N EQUL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER

3

4 MEMORNDUM TO: FROM: Planning Commission Community & Economic Development Department DTE: July 2, 2019 SUBJECT: rchitectural and Landscape Comments on Proposed Taco Bell 1. Continue slat wall above aluminum valance next to the tower on the south wall to match other elevations. 2. Change proposed gray brick color to a color more consistent with neighboring buildings in The Grove development. 3. Extend brick veneer along vertical columns in order to contrast with E.I.F.S substrate behind. Refer to similar design on neighboring buildings. 4. The two existing Willow trees along the western property line appear to be in the public right-of-way and will not be counted towards the required tree total. Confirm the location of these trees and provide two additional trees if necessary. 5. Do not relocate the two Linden trees between southern parking lot access points, as indicated. Rather, reposition the section of sidewalk so as not to disturb existing trees. Protect all existing trees with temporary fencing during construction. 6. No more than 20 percent (4 trees) of the total number of overstory trees shall be composed of one genus. The landscape plan includes 5 Kentucky Coffee trees, replace at least one of these trees with another genus variety. 7. The landscape plan lacks sufficient shrubs, grass and perennials. Incorporate a full complement of these items in the final landscape plan. 8. The landscape plan is subject to additional review and comments from the rbor Committee.

5 MEMORNDUM TO: FROM: Jesse Corrow, ssociate Planner John Hagen, P.E., PTOE, Transportation Operations Engineer DTE: July 3, 2019 SUBJECT: Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study: City Review The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a brief summary of the Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study and document review comments from City staff. Background In order to determine the traffic-related impacts associated with the proposed development of the Taco Bell located on the east side of approximately 375 feet north of the Maple Grove Parkway intersection with, a phased traffic study was conducted. The first phase of the traffic study included a trip generation comparison of the proposed development to the originally approved 2006 development plan for The Grove development. If the proposed development generated greater than 10 percent additional trips in/out of the site, then a more detailed traffic analysis would be required in order to determine if any additional roadway system improvements would be required in order to accommodate the site-generated traffic. If the proposed development generated less than 10 percent additional trips, then the results of the earlier Grove Development Traffic Study would still be valid. Phase I Trip Generation Comparison Summary lliant Engineering completed a trip generation comparison of the proposed Taco Bell development to the originally approved 2006 development plan for The Grove development. The trip generation comparison also included a comparison of the current plans for the remaining vacant parcels within The Grove development with the approved 2006 development plan. The results of the trip generation comparison revealed that the proposed development (including the Bobby s uto Center, Raising Canes, and the recently approved Caribou Coffee) would generate approximately 55 percent more trips on a daily basis, 68 percent more trips during the a.m. peak, and approximately 31 percent more trips than the original 2006 development plan for The Grove during the p.m. peak hour. copy of the trip generation comparison is attached to this memo. Since these increases in site-generated traffic is greater than the previously mentioned 10 percent threshold, a detailed traffic study was required.

6 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study: City Review July 3, 2019 Page 2 Phase II Maple Grove Taco Bell Traffic Impact Study Summary City staff worked with lliant Engineering to develop a scope for the detailed traffic analysis of the Taco Bell development. The traffic study included not only the proposed Taco Bell (referred to as the current development plan), but also considered the recently approved Caribou Coffee store, the planned development of the remaining vacant parcels with The Grove development, as well as the build out of the two vacant pads between the existing Target and Slumberland Furniture stores, north of Grove Circle (referred to as the potential future development plan). City staff reviewed and approved of the trip generation and directional distribution assumptions that were used in the traffic study. The traffic study also included a site plan review in order to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding vehicle ingress/egress, drive-through capacity, and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity. The site plan review revealed the following: Truck turning movements should be reviewed to ensure that delivery and garbage/recycling trucks have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. The proposed drive-through lane provides capacity for approximately eight (8) passenger vehicles. While a slight potential exists for peak queuing to exceed this capacity, maximum queues are likely to extend internal to the site, thus avoiding obstruction of the internal roadways within The Grove development. o Furthermore, sufficient parking is provided onsite for those individuals who might decide to exit their vehicles and enter the Taco Bell rather than wait in the drive-through lane queue. crosswalk is planned at the /Central ccess intersection as part of the proposed development. Under current conditions, pedestrians would cross five lanes of motor vehicle traffic to traverse. Therefore, a center median island refuge should be considered to allow pedestrians to cross in two stages with only one direction of motor vehicle traffic potentially conflicting at a time. These observations are reasonable; however, further discussions between the City and the pplicant are needed regarding the proposed crosswalk at the /Central ccess to The Grove development. The results of the traffic study revealed that all study intersections along and Maple Grove Parkway would be able to accommodate the development-related traffic volumes at an overall intersection level of service C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours regardless of the development scenarios (i.e. current development plan and/or the potential future development scenarios). The study also noted that moderate queuing may occur on the South ccess approach to Hospital Drive during the midday and p.m. peak hours. During these periods, brief blockages of the primary Taco Bell access may occur. While inbound Taco Bell customers will still have the ability to either continue to the east and still access the site using the drive aisle to the east of the site s primary access, or even enter the Taco Bell site from the north using The Grove development s Central ccess Driveway along, the traffic study still

7 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study: City Review July 3, 2019 Page 3 recommended the installation of Do Not Block signs is recommended at the primary Taco Bell site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. copy of the traffic study is attached to this memo. City staff has reviewed the traffic study results and agrees with the conclusions that the existing adjacent public roadway system can accommodate the proposed development without any additional improvements. However, City staff did request additional information from lliant Engineering in order to determine the extent of the identified queuing issue that may occasionally block the primary Taco Bell access located along The Grove development s South ccess approach to. lliant Engineering provided the City with detailed queuing and blocking reports for the existing, 2020 Build, and 2025 Build conditions. Based on the data provided in the queuing and blocking reports, the time period reporting the greatest queuing and blockage potential is the midday peak. During the 2020 Build conditions, the primary Taco Bell access will be blocked approximately 6 percent of the midday peak hour. Under the 2025 Build conditions, the primary Taco Bell access will be blocked approximately 12 percent of the midday peak hour. While these reported blockage times are not substantial, when they do occur the blockages will likely increase friction in an already congested access into The Grove development. (See highlighted and redlined portions of Detailed Operations and Queueing nalysis located in ppendix of the attached Maple Grove Taco Bell Traffic Impact Study). The good news is that The Grove development does have seven access points located along the adjacent public roadway system. Once inside The Grove development, one north/south, and three east/west internal roadways provide motorists with access to alternative driveways, should one driveway become congested at any given time. Nevertheless, in addition to the traffic study s recommendation of the installation of a Do Not Block sign at the primary Taco Bell access, City staff further recommends that The Grove development s South ccess approach to be striped to provide two distinct outbound lanes (1 shared leftturn/through lane, and 1 exclusive right-turn lane). This striping will help to further define the exit lanes and minimize the potential that vehicular queues will block access into the proposed Taco Bell. (See attached Exhibit for recommended traffic-related improvements). It is further recommended that traffic operations of The Grove development s South ccess be monitored to see if the reported blockages materialize and/or become problematic to the point where left-turning traffic into the Taco Bell site block other Grove development traffic from entering the site via the South ccess. If this does occur, then the existing center median on the South ccess approach to should be extended to the east, past the primary access to Taco Bell, Caribou Coffee, and Bobby s uto World. This would essentially create rightin/right-out accesses at the primary Taco Bell access on the north side of the South ccess, and a right-in/right-out access to the Caribou Coffee and Bobby s uto World on the south side. The attached Exhibit also illustrates this potential future center median extension. ttachments: Maple Grove Taco Bell Trip Generation Comparison Memo Maple Grove Taco Bell Traffic Impact Study Exhibit : Recommended Traffic-Related Improvements

8 Memorandum TO: FROM: Zach Zelickson, Border Foods Jordan Schwarze, PE, lliant Engineering Nick Grage, PE, lliant Engineering DTE: pril 16, 2019 SUBJECT: Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memorandum Introduction lliant Engineering has completed this memorandum to document the trip generation potential of a proposed Taco Bell development located in The Grove retail center bounded by, Maple Grove Parkway, and Grove Circle in Maple Grove, MN (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). The findings of this memorandum will be used by the Developer (Border Foods) and the City of Maple Grove to determine if further traffic study is necessary at intersections along. The proposed development consists of a 2,701 square-foot Taco Bell restaurant with drive-through. Full access to the site is gained from, with a primary entrance along The Grove South ccess and a secondary entrance along The Grove Central ccess. Figure 1 Project Location The Grove (2019) N LEGEND The Grove Limits Taco Bell (Proposed) Steve s uto World (Existing) Park Nicollet Clinic (Existing) Raising Cane s (Existing) Caribou Coffee (Proposed) Retail Space (Proposed)

9 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 2 of 7 Figure 2 Proposed Development Taco Bell N Trip Generation Comparison (The Grove) trip generation comparison was performed to determine the trip generation potential of the original and proposed development plans based on various land uses for The Grove retail center. For this task, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition was referenced. This manual is a compilation of daily and peak hour trip generation rates based on data collected from similar development sites. Original Development Plan (The Grove) Trips were initially estimated for the original year 2006 development plan (see Figure 3), which included general retail and restaurant land uses. summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the original development plan over the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 1. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the original development plan would have been expected to generate approximately 330 a.m. peak hour, 607 p.m. peak hour, and 6,612 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction applied to all land uses except general retail (based on the methodology described in the ITE Trip Generation Manual).

10 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 3 of 7 Figure 3 Original Development Plan The Grove (2006) N Table 1 Trip Generation Estimates (Original Development Plan The Grove 2006) Land Use (ITE Code) General Retail (820) M PM Units Size Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 105, ,964 Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 2 Land Use Gross Trips ,964 High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) Gross Floor rea (SF) 16, ,884 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,412 Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, ,648 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,236 Subtotal Gross Trips ,496 Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips ,612 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction.

11 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 4 of 7 Proposed Development Plan (The Grove) Trips were then estimated for the proposed development plan (shown previously Figure 1 and Figure 2), which includes existing land uses as well as the proposed Taco Bell restaurant replacing 8,300 square feet of retail space. summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the proposed development plan over the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 2. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the proposed development plan is expected to generate approximately 555 a.m. peak hour, 797 p.m. peak hour, and 10,280 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction applied to all land uses except general retail (based on ITE methodology). Table 2 Trip Generation Estimates (Proposed Development Plan The Grove 2019) Land Use (ITE Code) Clinic (630) M PM Units Size Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 26, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips General Retail (820) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 3 (934) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 4 (934) Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (937) utomobile Parts and Service Center (943) Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market (945) Gross Land rea (SF) 83, ,158 Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 2 Land Use Gross Trips ,158 Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,272 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, ,798 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,348 Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,092 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,568 Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Fueling Stations (E) ,286 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,464 Subtotal Gross Trips Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction. 3: Taco Bell is open for breakfast in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea. 4: Raising Cane's is not open for breakfast in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea , , ,280 From the results of the trip generation estimates for The Grove, a comparison of peak hour and total daily trips for the two development scenarios was made with the findings summarized in Table 3. The proposed development plan, which includes existing land uses and the proposed Taco Bell restaurant, is expected to increase trips over the original development plan by at least 31 percent during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis.

12 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 5 of 7 Table 3 Comparison of Development Scenarios (The Grove) Development Scenario M Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Total Gross Trips % Increase Total Gross Trips % Increase Total Gross Trips % Increase Original Development Plan (2006) 330 N/ 607 N/ 6,612 N/ Proposed Development Plan (2019) % % 10, % Despite an increase in anticipated trips over the a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis, intersections surrounding The Grove retail center have demonstrated acceptable operations to this point (Level-of-Service C or better during the weekday peak hours). Furthermore, year 2020 and year 2025 operations forecasts completed for the Maple Grove Caribou Coffee Development Traffic Impact Study (completed by lliant in October 2018) indicate surrounding intersections are expected to continue operating at overall LOS C or better 1. Trip Generation Comparison (Taco Bell Parcel) Trips were also estimated specifically for the proposed Taco Bell parcel from original year 2006 development plan, which included a general retail land use (8,300 square feet). Original Development Plan (Taco Bell Parcel) summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the original development plan over the weekday a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 4. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the original general retail land use would have been expected to generate approximately 8 a.m. peak hour, 32 midday peak hour, 32 p.m. peak hour, and 314 daily trips. Table 4 Trip Generation Estimates (Original Development Plan Taco Bell Parcel 2006) M MIDDY PM Land Use Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 2 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Units Size (ITE Code) Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 8, General Retail Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 3 (820) Land Use Gross Trips Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hour using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction. 1 Maple Grove Caribou Coffee Development Traffic Impact Study, lliant Engineering (Jordan Schwarze) October 2018

13 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 6 of 7 Proposed Development Plan (Taco Bell Parcel) Trips were then estimated specifically for the proposed Taco Bell (2,701 square-foot restaurant with drive-through). summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the proposed Taco Bell over the weekday a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 5. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the proposed Taco Bell is expected to generate approximately 81 a.m. peak hour, 113 midday peak hour, 65 p.m. peak hour, and 954 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction (based on ITE methodology). Table 5 Trip Generation Estimates (Proposed Development Plan Taco Bell Parcel 2019) Land Use (ITE Code) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) M MIDDY PM Units Size Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 2 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,272 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hour using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: 25 percent multi-use reduction was applied to be consistent with previous traffic studies within "The Grove". From the results of the trip generation estimates for the proposed Taco Bell parcel, a comparison of peak hour and total daily trips for the two development scenarios was made. The proposed Taco Bell development is expected to increase trips over the originally planned general retail land use during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis. However, it should be noted that other parcels within The Grove retail center have been developed as higher-generating land uses, several of which were illustrated previously in Figure 1. Furthermore, intersections surrounding the proposed Taco Bell development are expected to demonstrate acceptable operations into the near- and mid-term future. review of the year 2025 model created for the Maple Grove Caribou Coffee Development Traffic Impact Study indicated that intersections surrounding The Grove retail center are expected to continue operating at LOS C or better during the weekday peak hours with the inclusion of Taco Bell site-generated trips.

14 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 7 of 7 Drive-Through ssessment review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding the drive-through geometry and capacity. Per the site plan, the proposed drive-through lane shows capacity for approximately 8 passenger vehicles. Local research into fast-food drive-through queuing 2 indicates the 85th percentile queues observed over multiple sites in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea was 12 vehicles (i.e. 240 feet). While the potential exists for peak queuing to exceed the available 8 vehicle capacity, additional queues would extend internal to the site, thus avoiding obstruction of either The Grove South ccess or adjacent developments. Furthermore, sufficient parking is provided onsite for those individuals who might decide to exit their vehicles and enter the Taco Bell rather than wait in the drive-through lane queue. lthough it would be advisable for the proposed Taco Bell to provide queueing capacity for 12 vehicles within the drive-through lane, there is likely room for additional vehicles to queue onsite without obstructing internal driving lanes. Therefore, no significant drive-through queuing issues are anticipated. Conclusions The proposed Taco Bell development is expected to increase trips over the originally planned general retail land use on the same parcel during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis. However, it should be noted that other parcels within The Grove retail center have been developed as higher-generating land uses as compared to the original development plan. Furthermore, intersections surrounding the proposed Taco Bell development are expected to demonstrate acceptable operations (LOS C or better during weekday peak hours) into the near- and mid-term future. Finally, no significant Taco Bell drive-through queuing issues are anticipated. S:\2019\190041\DOCS\MG Taco Bell_TG Memo_ docx 2 Drive-Through Queue Generation, Counting Cars (Mike Spack, Max Moreland, Lindsay de Leeuw, Nate Hood), February 2012,

15 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development - Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove, MN Prepared For: Zach Zelickson Border Foods 5425 Boone venue N New Hope, MN Prepared By: Jordan Schwarze, PE Nick Grage, PE Draft Report Version 2 June 4, 2019 lliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette ve, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402

16 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Table of Contents List of Figures... ii List of Tables... ii 1.0 Introduction Existing Conditions STUDY RE INTERSECTIONS DT COLLECTION Traffic Volumes Roadway/ Characteristics Pedestrian/Bicycle ccommodations INTERSECTION CPCITY NLYSIS Proposed Development TRIP GENERTION ITE Trip Generation Current Development Plan (2020) ITE Trip Generation Potential Future Development Plan (2025) Background Traffic Growth TRIP DISTRIBUTION ND SSIGNMENT Year 2020 Build Conditions RODWY NETWORK SSUMPTIONS INTERSECTION CPCITY NLYSIS Year 2025 Build Conditions RODWY NETWORK SSUMPTIONS INTERSECTION CPCITY NLYSIS Site Plan Review Conclusions/Recommendations...19 ppendix Detailed Operations and Queuing nalysis... lliant No June 4, 2019 i

17 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development List of Figures Figure 1. Project Location... 2 Figure 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Figure 3. Proposed Site Plan... 7 Figure 4. Proposed Development Directional Distribution Figure 5. dditional Planned Development Directional Distribution Figure 6. Year 2020 Build Conditions Figure 7. Year 2025 Build Conditions List of Tables Table 1 Roadway Characteristics... 3 Table 2 Characteristics... 3 Table 3 Level of Service Criteria... 5 Table 4 Existing Capacity nalysis... 6 Table 5 Trip Generation Estimates (Current Development Plan)... 9 Table 6 Trip Generation Estimates (Potential Future Development Plan) Table 7 Year 2020 Build Capacity nalysis Table 8 Year 2025 Build Capacity nalysis lliant No June 4, 2019 ii

18 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 1.0 Introduction lliant Engineering has completed a traffic impact study for the proposed Taco Bell development located in The Grove retail center adjacent to Maple Grove Parkway in northwestern Maple Grove, MN (see Figure 1). The proposed development consists of a 2,701 square-foot Taco Bell restaurant with a drive-through. The main objectives of this study are to evaluate existing traffic operations within the study area, identify any potential traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and recommend improvements to address issues if necessary. The following provides the assumptions, analysis, and study conclusions/recommendations offered for consideration. 2.0 Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline for identifying any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. 2.1 Study rea s Through discussions with public stakeholders, the following study intersections were identified: Maple Grove Parkway & & (The Grove) North ccess & (The Grove) Central ccess & (The Grove) South ccess 2.2 Data Collection Traffic Volumes To document existing conditions, intersection turning movement counts were collected by lliant Engineering during the week of July 30, 2018 over the following time periods: M Peak Period: 7:00-9:00 a.m. Midday Peak Period: 11:30-1:30 p.m. PM Peak Period: 4:00-6:00 p.m. It should be noted that intersection turning movement counts were collected prior to the opening of Raising Cane s on ugust 7, Consequently, trip generation estimates for Raising Cane s have been included in current and potential future development analysis scenarios. lliant No June 4, 2019

19

20 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Roadway/ Characteristics In addition to traffic volume data collection, observations were completed to identify roadway/ intersection characteristics within the study area (i.e. geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls), which are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Existing geometry, traffic controls, and peak hour traffic volumes within the study area are shown in Figure 2. Table 1 Roadway Characteristics Roadway Cross-Section Speed Limit Functional Classification Maple Grove Parkway 4-Lane Divided w/ Dedicated Turn Lanes 40 mph Minor rterial 4-Lane Divided w/ Dedicated Turn Lanes 30 mph Local Table 2 Characteristics Lane Designations by pproach (1) Traffic Control NB SB EB WB Maple Grove Parkway & (2) Traffic Signal L/L/T/T/R L/T/T/R L/T/R L/TR & North ccess Side-Street Stop - R T/T T/TR & Central ccess Side-Street Stop LT/R LT/TR L/T/TR L/T/TR & South ccess Side-Street Stop LTR LTR L/T/TR L/T/TR (1) L=Left-Turn, T=Through, R=Right-Turn (2) Maple Grove Parkway/ intersection east leg functions as a driveway for the Parkway Station Park & Ride It should be noted that to simplify the analysis process throughout this traffic impact study Maple Grove Parkway will be defined as a northbound/southbound roadway (geographically runs northeast/southwest) and will be defined as an eastbound/westbound roadway (geographically runs northwest/southeast). s a result, the North ccess, Central ccess, and South ccess driveways are all considered northbound/southbound roadways for the purpose of this study Pedestrian/Bicycle ccommodations Existing pedestrian/bicycle accommodations in the vicinity of the proposed development were also documented. t the Maple Grove Parkway/ intersection, pedestrian pushbutton activated phasing is available across all four intersection approaches. shared-use path extends along both the east and west sides of Maple Grove Parkway throughout the study area, while a sidewalk runs along the south side of. lliant No June 4, 2019

21

22 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 2.3 Capacity nalysis n existing intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations could be compared. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. s are given a ranking from LOS through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 3. LOS indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. The LOS D/E boundary for overall operations is often used as the indicator of congestion in an urban area. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, a key measure of operational effectiveness is the side-street LOS. Long delays and poor LOS can occur on side-street approaches even if the overall intersection is functioning well, making side-street LOS a valuable design criterion. Table 3 Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Description Delay per Vehicle (seconds) Signalized Unsignalized Free Flow: Low volumes and no delays B Stable Flow: Speeds restricted by travel conditions, minor delays. > > C D E F Stable Flow: Speeds and maneuverability closely controlled due to higher volumes. Stable Flow: Speeds considerably affected by change in operating conditions. High density traffic restricts maneuverability, volume near capacity. Unstable Flow: Low speeds, considerable delay, volume at or slightly over capacity. Forced Flow: Very low speeds, volume exceed capacity, long delays with stop and go traffic. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 Edition, Transportation Research Board, Exhibits 18-4 & > > > > > > > 80 > 50 fter LOS, the second component of the capacity analysis is a study of vehicular queuing, or the lineup of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. n intersection can operate with an acceptable LOS, but if queues from the intersection block entrances to turn lanes or adjacent driveways, unsafe operating conditions could result. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with only a five (5) percent probability of being exceeded during an analysis period, is considered the standard for design purposes. The existing intersection capacity analysis was performed for the study intersections over the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours (within the 7:00-9:00 a.m., 11:30-1:30 p.m., and 4:00-6:00 p.m. timeframes respectively) as observed by lliant Engineering during the week of July 30, lliant No June 4, 2019

23 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis presented in Table 4 indicate that all study intersections currently operate at overall LOS B or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side-street delay or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulations. Detailed operations and queuing analysis results are presented in ppendix. Table 4 Existing Capacity nalysis Maple Grove Parkway & B / C 11.9 / 34.5 B / C 14.8 / 26.2 B / D 18.0 / 38.4 & North ccess / 0.2 / 0.3 / 0.2 / 4.0 / 0.2 / 2.4 & Central ccess / 1.5 / 5.2 / 1.9 / 6.3 / 1.7 / 6.4 & South ccess / 2.3 / 6.6 / 2.7 / 9.3 / 2.8 / 7.9 Overall LOS / Worst Overall Delay / Worst pproach Delay M Peak Hour MID Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) 3.0 Proposed Development The current Taco Bell development proposal (shown in Figure 3) consists of the following: 2,701-square-foot Taco Bell restaurant with a drive-through window No definitive timeline has been established for construction of the development, though a year 2020 completion was assumed for the purpose of this study. Existing access to the proposed development is available at the following two (2) locations: Primary ccess along the South ccess roadway: o Located approximately 130 feet northeast of Secondary ccess along an internal driveway linking the South ccess and Central ccess roadways: o Located approximately 110 feet south of the Central ccess roadway It should be noted that most vehicles are expected to access the proposed development via, though roadway connections internal to The Grove exist to the east. It should also be noted that a crosswalk is planned at the /Central ccess intersection as part of the overall development of The Grove. The crosswalk would provide pedestrians an improved crossing between Maple Grove Hospital and The Grove. lliant No June 4, 2019

24

25 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 3.1 Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates were developed for the weekday a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis. The trip generation estimates were developed utilizing trip generation rates for similar land uses as documented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10 th Edition ITE Trip Generation Current Development Plan (2020) The ITE Trip Generation Manual was utilized to estimate the trip generation potential for the proposed development as well as for additional developments that will be built or are currently being built near the proposed development. Estimated site generated traffic based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual is detailed in Table 5. dditional developments considered for the purpose of estimating the year 2020 trip generation: Caribou Coffee o 2,549-square-foot Caribou Coffee/Einstein Bros Bagels with Drive-Through Window Raising Cane s (opened ugust 7, 2018 after traffic counts were collected): o 3,819-square-foot Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window Hy-Vee Development: o The proposed Hy-Vee development is located in the northeast quadrant of the Maple Grove Parkway/Grove Circle intersection. This development is expected to consist of a 96,000 square-foot Supermarket and a 4,100 square-foot Gas Station/ Convenience Store. The development is also expected to incorporate a Mid-Rise partment complex of up to 150 dwelling units. Territorial Woods Development: o The Territorial Woods development (currently under construction) is a mix of highand medium-density housing with 167 dwelling units (98 apartments and 69 townhomes) located nearly a mile northeast of the study area. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the current development plan (including the Raising Cane s trips) is expected to generate approximately 251 a.m. peak hour, 418 midday peak hour, 242 p.m. peak hour, and 3,870 daily trips. Based on the methodology described in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, these trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction. It should be noted that a portion of the development trips are expected to be from motorists already traveling within the study area, primarily along Maple Grove Parkway, who will now divert their trip to the proposed development before continuing to their destination (i.e. passby trips). Pass-by percentages for each land use were referenced in the ITE Trip Generation Manual and applied to all land uses. Taking into account pass-by trips, the resultant net new traffic volume impact to the adjacent roadway network is estimated to be approximately 57 a.m. peak hour, 170 midday peak hour, 86 p.m. peak hour, and 1,322 daily trips for the current development plan. lliant No June 4, 2019

26 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Table 5 Trip Generation Estimates (Current Development Plan) Land Use (ITE Code) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 3 (934) Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (937) Hy-Vee Supermarket/C-Store Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise (221) Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise (221) Multifamily Housing Low-Rise (220) Units Size M Peak Hour Trips 1 MID Peak Hour Trips 2 PM Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips The Grove Developments Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,272 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (50%) Land Use Net Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, ,798 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,348 Pass-By Trips (50%) Land Use Net Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,092 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,568 Pass-By Trips (89%) ,396 Land Use Net Trips The Grove Developments Totals Subtotal Gross Trips Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips Pass-By Trips Net New Trips Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (50%) Land Use Net Trips , , , , ,322 Other Developments , , ,536 Dwelling Unit Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Dwelling Unit Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Dwelling Unit Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Other Developments Totals Subtotal Gross Trips ,924 Multi-Use Reduction Not pplicable Development Gross Trips ,924 Pass-By Trips ,536 Net New Trips ,388 Source: Existing Brooklyn Park, MN Hy-Vee observations and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Note: Pass-By Trips and Multi-Use Reduction only applied where applicable. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hours using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: Raising Cane's is not open for breakfast in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea. lliant No June 4, 2019

27 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Meanwhile, the nearby Hy-Vee and Territorial Woods developments are expected to generate approximately 533 a.m. peak hour, 662 midday peak hour, 960 p.m. peak hour, and 10,924 daily trips. To provide conservative trip generation estimates for the nearby developments, no multi-use reduction was applied. Taking into account pass-by trips, the resultant net new traffic volume impact to the adjacent roadway network is estimated to be approximately 327 a.m. peak hour, 376 midday peak hour, 554 p.m. peak hour, and 6,388 daily trips for the nearby developments ITE Trip Generation Potential Future Development Plan (2025) The potential exists for future development within The Grove, including a 63-room hotel, a +5,000-square-foot medical/dental office building, 100,000 square feet of self-storage, and approximately 60,000 square feet of additional retail space. The ITE Trip Generation Manual was again utilized to estimate the trip generation potential for the potential future development plan, including the hotel, medical/dental office building, self-storage, and additional retail space. Estimated site generated traffic based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual is detailed in Table 6. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the potential future development plan is expected to generate approximately 94 a.m. peak hour, 288 midday peak hour, 272 p.m. peak hour, and 2,795 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction applied to all land uses except general retail (based on the methodology described in the ITE Trip Generation Manual). Pass-by percentages for each land use were again referenced in the ITE Trip Generation Manual and applied as appropriate. Taking into account pass-by trips, the resultant net new traffic volume impact to the adjacent roadway network is estimated to be approximately 76 a.m. peak hour, 206 midday peak hour, 198 p.m. peak hour, and 2,063 daily trips Background Traffic Growth Historical annual average daily traffic (DT) volumes were provided by MnDOT via its Traffic Forecasting & nalysis website, while forecast volumes were provided in the draft City of Maple Grove 2040 Comprehensive Plan. To account for continued traffic volume growth within the study area outside of the planned/proposed developments documented in this study, an annual growth rate of one (1) percent was applied to existing traffic volumes to provide a conservative estimate of future conditions. lliant No June 4, 2019

28 Table 6 Trip Generation Estimates (Potential Future Development Plan) Land Use (ITE Code) Mini-Warehouse (151) Hotel 3 (310) Medical-Dental Office Building (720) General Retail 3 (820) 3.2 Trip Distribution and ssignment Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Units Size M Peak Hour Trips 1 MID Peak Hour Trips 2 PM Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 100, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Rooms Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 5, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 57, ,154 Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 4 Land Use Gross Trips ,154 Pass-By Trips (34%) Land Use Net Trips ,422 Subtotal Gross Trips ,009 Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips ,795 Pass-By Trips Net New Trips ,063 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Note: Pass-By Trips and Multi-Use Reduction only applied where applicable. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hours using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: Potential future hotel development would remove approximately 8,328 square feet of existing General Retail space, resulting in a net loss of retail space south of Grove Circle. General Retail space, including the 60,000 square feet of additional retail space planned north of Grove Circle, was adjusted accordingly. 4: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction. The distribution of site-generated traffic was estimated based on a review of existing traffic volumes/patterns and engineering judgement. The estimated proposed development directional distribution is shown in Figure 4, while the estimated additional planned development directional distribution is shown in Figure 5. These trip distributions were applied to the respective estimated site-generated traffic volumes to forecast year 2020 build conditions (current development plan) and year 2025 build conditions (potential future development plan). The resultant year 2020 and year 2025 build traffic forecasts are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7 respectively. lliant No June 4, 2019

29

30

31

32

33 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 4.0 Year 2020 Build Conditions To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, year 2020 build conditions (i.e. estimated current development plan completion) were evaluated. 4.1 Roadway Network ssumptions For the year 2020 build conditions analysis, several roadway network assumptions were made: Proposed developments under the 2020 build conditions include: o Taco Bell o Caribou Coffee/Einstein Bros Bagels o Raising Cane s (opened ugust 7, 2018 after traffic counts were collected) o Hy-Vee Development o Territorial Woods Development Maple Grove Parkway traffic signal timing and phasing improvements previously recommended under a different study were assumed to be implemented. 4.2 Capacity nalysis To understand the extent to which the proposed development impacts the study area roadway network, the forecasted year 2020 build conditions were analyzed. Results of the year 2020 build intersection capacity analysis presented in Table 7 indicate that all study intersections are expected to operate at overall LOS C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours under the baseline roadway network assumptions. Moderate 95th percentile queues (~150 feet) are anticipated on the South ccess approach to during the midday peak hour. These queues may result in brief blockages of the primary Taco Bell access, though inbound motorists will still have the ability to continue to the secondary site access. Nonetheless, Do Not Block signs should be installed at the primary site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. Detailed operations and queuing analysis results are presented in ppendix. Table 7 Year 2020 Build Capacity nalysis Maple Grove Parkway & B / D 14.6 / 38.9 B / C 15.9 / 24.8 C / D 22.4 / 43.2 & North ccess / 0.1 / 0.2 / 0.2 / 2.3 / 0.2 / 2.4 & Central ccess / 1.6 / 5.3 / 2.1 / 7.4 / 1.7 / 6.2 & South ccess / B 3.7 / 10.2 / C 6.0 / 16.6 / B 4.6 / 11.5 Overall LOS / Worst Overall Delay / Worst pproach Delay M Peak Hour MID Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) lliant No June 4, 2019

34 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 5.0 Year 2025 Build Conditions To help determine impacts associated with the potential future development, year 2025 build conditions (i.e. estimated potential future development plan completion) were evaluated. 5.1 Roadway Network ssumptions For the year 2025 build conditions analysis, several roadway network assumptions were made: Proposed developments under the 2025 build conditions include: o Taco Bell o Caribou Coffee/Einstein Bros Bagels o Raising Cane s (opened ugust 7, 2018 after traffic counts were collected) o Crimsoncare Dental & Medical Office (5,089 SF) o Hy-Vee Development o Territorial Woods Development o Hotel (63 rooms) The potential hotel development would be expected to displace approximately 8,328 square-feet of existing retail space. o Self-Storage (100,000 SF) & Retail Space (57,072 SF) Trips generated by additional retail space within The Grove (5,400 SF) and a small portion of the 60,000 SF retail space were offset by the displacement of existing retail space resulting from the potential hotel development a net gain of 57,072 SF of retail space for No change in Maple Grove Parkway traffic signal timing and phasing was made from the year 2020 build conditions. 5.2 Capacity nalysis To understand the extent to which the potential future development impacts the study area roadway network, the forecasted year 2025 build conditions were analyzed. Results of the year 2025 build intersection capacity analysis presented in Table 8 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at overall LOS C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours under the baseline roadway network assumptions. Moderate 95th percentile queues (~150 to 175 feet) are anticipated on the South ccess approach to during the midday and p.m. peak hours. These queues may result in brief blockages of the primary Taco Bell access, though inbound motorists will still have the ability to continue to the secondary site access. s previously recommended, Do Not Block signs should be installed at the primary site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. Detailed operations and queuing analysis results are presented in ppendix. lliant No June 4, 2019

35 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Table 8 Year 2025 Build Capacity nalysis M Peak Hour MID Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) Maple Grove Parkway & B / C 15.5 / 34.0 C / C 21.2 / 23.5 C / D 26.4 / 42.4 & North ccess / 0.2 / 0.2 / 0.1 / 2.5 / 0.2 / 2.5 & Central ccess / 1.7 / 6.1 / 1.8 / 7.7 / 1.6 / 7.4 & South ccess / B 4.2 / 12.5 / C 7.0 / 22.7 / C 6.8 / 22.6 Overall LOS / Worst Overall Delay / Worst pproach Delay 6.0 Site Plan Review review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding vehicle ingress/egress, drive-through capacity, and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity. The following conclusions/recommendations should be considered: Truck turning movements should be reviewed to ensure that delivery and garbage/recycling trucks have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. The proposed drive-through lane provides capacity for approximately eight (8) passenger vehicles. While a slight potential exists for peak queuing to exceed this capacity, maximum queues are likely to extend internal to the site, thus avoiding obstruction of The Grove internal roadways. o Furthermore, sufficient parking is provided onsite for those individuals who might decide to exit their vehicles and enter the Taco Bell rather than wait in the drive-through lane queue. crosswalk is planned at the /Central ccess intersection as part of the overall development of The Grove. Under current conditions, pedestrians would cross five lanes of motor vehicle traffic to traverse. Therefore, a center median island refuge should be considered to allow pedestrians to cross in two stages with only one direction of motor vehicle traffic potentially conflicting at a time. lliant No June 4, 2019

36 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 7.0 Conclusions/Recommendations The following study conclusions/recommendations are offered for consideration: Results of the year 2020 and year 2025 build intersection capacity analyses indicate that all study intersections are expected to operate at overall LOS C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours. Moderate queuing may occur on the South ccess approach to during the midday and p.m. peak hours. Therefore, the installation of Do Not Block signs is recommended at the primary Taco Bell site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. Recommendations related to proposed development vehicle ingress/egress, drive-through capacity, and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity are listed in Section 6.0: Site Plan Review. lliant No June 4, 2019

37 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development ppendix Detailed Operations and Queuing nalysis lliant No ppendix

38 2018 Existing - M Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS E B D D B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B 34.5 C 12.7 B 10.0

39 2018 Existing - MID Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D D D B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B 26.2 C 17.0 B 11.8 B

40 2018 Existing - PM Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D E E E B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C D C B

41 2020 Build - M Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D C B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C 38.9 D 15.5 B 10.1 B

42 2020 Build - MID Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS C C C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C 17.1 B 17.1 B 7.4

43 2020 Build - PM Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D C D E B E D B C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C D C B

44 2025 Build - M Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D E B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C C B 10.8 B

45 2025 Build - MID Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B C C C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B C D B C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C 18.0 B 23.5 C 16.7 B

46 2025 Build - PM Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B C C D Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B C & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS C C D E B E B E B B C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C D C B

47 Exhibit : Recommended Traffic-Related Improvements Signing & Striping

48 Exhibit : Recommended Traffic-Related Improvements Potential Future Center Median Extension Potential future extension of center median (if left-turns into Taco Bell become problematic)

49

50 MEMORNDUM TO: FROM: Jesse Corrow, ssociate Planner John Hagen, P.E., PTOE, Transportation Operations Engineer DTE: July 3, 2019 SUBJECT: Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study: City Review The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a brief summary of the Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study and document review comments from City staff. Background In order to determine the traffic-related impacts associated with the proposed development of the Taco Bell located on the east side of approximately 375 feet north of the Maple Grove Parkway intersection with, a phased traffic study was conducted. The first phase of the traffic study included a trip generation comparison of the proposed development to the originally approved 2006 development plan for The Grove development. If the proposed development generated greater than 10 percent additional trips in/out of the site, then a more detailed traffic analysis would be required in order to determine if any additional roadway system improvements would be required in order to accommodate the site-generated traffic. If the proposed development generated less than 10 percent additional trips, then the results of the earlier Grove Development Traffic Study would still be valid. Phase I Trip Generation Comparison Summary lliant Engineering completed a trip generation comparison of the proposed Taco Bell development to the originally approved 2006 development plan for The Grove development. The trip generation comparison also included a comparison of the current plans for the remaining vacant parcels within The Grove development with the approved 2006 development plan. The results of the trip generation comparison revealed that the proposed development (including the Bobby s uto Center, Raising Canes, and the recently approved Caribou Coffee) would generate approximately 55 percent more trips on a daily basis, 68 percent more trips during the a.m. peak, and approximately 31 percent more trips than the original 2006 development plan for The Grove during the p.m. peak hour. copy of the trip generation comparison is attached to this memo. Since these increases in site-generated traffic is greater than the previously mentioned 10 percent threshold, a detailed traffic study was required.

51 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study: City Review July 3, 2019 Page 2 Phase II Maple Grove Taco Bell Traffic Impact Study Summary City staff worked with lliant Engineering to develop a scope for the detailed traffic analysis of the Taco Bell development. The traffic study included not only the proposed Taco Bell (referred to as the current development plan), but also considered the recently approved Caribou Coffee store, the planned development of the remaining vacant parcels with The Grove development, as well as the build out of the two vacant pads between the existing Target and Slumberland Furniture stores, north of Grove Circle (referred to as the potential future development plan). City staff reviewed and approved of the trip generation and directional distribution assumptions that were used in the traffic study. The traffic study also included a site plan review in order to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding vehicle ingress/egress, drive-through capacity, and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity. The site plan review revealed the following: Truck turning movements should be reviewed to ensure that delivery and garbage/recycling trucks have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. The proposed drive-through lane provides capacity for approximately eight (8) passenger vehicles. While a slight potential exists for peak queuing to exceed this capacity, maximum queues are likely to extend internal to the site, thus avoiding obstruction of the internal roadways within The Grove development. o Furthermore, sufficient parking is provided onsite for those individuals who might decide to exit their vehicles and enter the Taco Bell rather than wait in the drive-through lane queue. crosswalk is planned at the /Central ccess intersection as part of the proposed development. Under current conditions, pedestrians would cross five lanes of motor vehicle traffic to traverse. Therefore, a center median island refuge should be considered to allow pedestrians to cross in two stages with only one direction of motor vehicle traffic potentially conflicting at a time. These observations are reasonable; however, further discussions between the City and the pplicant are needed regarding the proposed crosswalk at the /Central ccess to The Grove development. The results of the traffic study revealed that all study intersections along and Maple Grove Parkway would be able to accommodate the development-related traffic volumes at an overall intersection level of service C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours regardless of the development scenarios (i.e. current development plan and/or the potential future development scenarios). The study also noted that moderate queuing may occur on the South ccess approach to Hospital Drive during the midday and p.m. peak hours. During these periods, brief blockages of the primary Taco Bell access may occur. While inbound Taco Bell customers will still have the ability to either continue to the east and still access the site using the drive aisle to the east of the site s primary access, or even enter the Taco Bell site from the north using The Grove development s Central ccess Driveway along, the traffic study still

52 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Traffic Study: City Review July 3, 2019 Page 3 recommended the installation of Do Not Block signs is recommended at the primary Taco Bell site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. copy of the traffic study is attached to this memo. City staff has reviewed the traffic study results and agrees with the conclusions that the existing adjacent public roadway system can accommodate the proposed development without any additional improvements. However, City staff did request additional information from lliant Engineering in order to determine the extent of the identified queuing issue that may occasionally block the primary Taco Bell access located along The Grove development s South ccess approach to. lliant Engineering provided the City with detailed queuing and blocking reports for the existing, 2020 Build, and 2025 Build conditions. Based on the data provided in the queuing and blocking reports, the time period reporting the greatest queuing and blockage potential is the midday peak. During the 2020 Build conditions, the primary Taco Bell access will be blocked approximately 6 percent of the midday peak hour. Under the 2025 Build conditions, the primary Taco Bell access will be blocked approximately 12 percent of the midday peak hour. While these reported blockage times are not substantial, when they do occur the blockages will likely increase friction in an already congested access into The Grove development. (See highlighted and redlined portions of Detailed Operations and Queueing nalysis located in ppendix of the attached Maple Grove Taco Bell Traffic Impact Study). The good news is that The Grove development does have seven access points located along the adjacent public roadway system. Once inside The Grove development, one north/south, and three east/west internal roadways provide motorists with access to alternative driveways, should one driveway become congested at any given time. Nevertheless, in addition to the traffic study s recommendation of the installation of a Do Not Block sign at the primary Taco Bell access, City staff further recommends that The Grove development s South ccess approach to be striped to provide two distinct outbound lanes (1 shared leftturn/through lane, and 1 exclusive right-turn lane). This striping will help to further define the exit lanes and minimize the potential that vehicular queues will block access into the proposed Taco Bell. (See attached Exhibit for recommended traffic-related improvements). It is further recommended that traffic operations of The Grove development s South ccess be monitored to see if the reported blockages materialize and/or become problematic to the point where left-turning traffic into the Taco Bell site block other Grove development traffic from entering the site via the South ccess. If this does occur, then the existing center median on the South ccess approach to should be extended to the east, past the primary access to Taco Bell, Caribou Coffee, and Bobby s uto World. This would essentially create rightin/right-out accesses at the primary Taco Bell access on the north side of the South ccess, and a right-in/right-out access to the Caribou Coffee and Bobby s uto World on the south side. The attached Exhibit also illustrates this potential future center median extension. ttachments: Maple Grove Taco Bell Trip Generation Comparison Memo Maple Grove Taco Bell Traffic Impact Study Exhibit : Recommended Traffic-Related Improvements

53 Memorandum TO: FROM: Zach Zelickson, Border Foods Jordan Schwarze, PE, lliant Engineering Nick Grage, PE, lliant Engineering DTE: pril 16, 2019 SUBJECT: Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memorandum Introduction lliant Engineering has completed this memorandum to document the trip generation potential of a proposed Taco Bell development located in The Grove retail center bounded by, Maple Grove Parkway, and Grove Circle in Maple Grove, MN (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). The findings of this memorandum will be used by the Developer (Border Foods) and the City of Maple Grove to determine if further traffic study is necessary at intersections along. The proposed development consists of a 2,701 square-foot Taco Bell restaurant with drive-through. Full access to the site is gained from, with a primary entrance along The Grove South ccess and a secondary entrance along The Grove Central ccess. Figure 1 Project Location The Grove (2019) N LEGEND The Grove Limits Taco Bell (Proposed) Steve s uto World (Existing) Park Nicollet Clinic (Existing) Raising Cane s (Existing) Caribou Coffee (Proposed) Retail Space (Proposed)

54 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 2 of 7 Figure 2 Proposed Development Taco Bell N Trip Generation Comparison (The Grove) trip generation comparison was performed to determine the trip generation potential of the original and proposed development plans based on various land uses for The Grove retail center. For this task, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition was referenced. This manual is a compilation of daily and peak hour trip generation rates based on data collected from similar development sites. Original Development Plan (The Grove) Trips were initially estimated for the original year 2006 development plan (see Figure 3), which included general retail and restaurant land uses. summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the original development plan over the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 1. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the original development plan would have been expected to generate approximately 330 a.m. peak hour, 607 p.m. peak hour, and 6,612 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction applied to all land uses except general retail (based on the methodology described in the ITE Trip Generation Manual).

55 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 3 of 7 Figure 3 Original Development Plan The Grove (2006) N Table 1 Trip Generation Estimates (Original Development Plan The Grove 2006) Land Use (ITE Code) General Retail (820) M PM Units Size Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 105, ,964 Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 2 Land Use Gross Trips ,964 High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant (932) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) Gross Floor rea (SF) 16, ,884 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,412 Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, ,648 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,236 Subtotal Gross Trips ,496 Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips ,612 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction.

56 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 4 of 7 Proposed Development Plan (The Grove) Trips were then estimated for the proposed development plan (shown previously Figure 1 and Figure 2), which includes existing land uses as well as the proposed Taco Bell restaurant replacing 8,300 square feet of retail space. summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the proposed development plan over the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 2. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the proposed development plan is expected to generate approximately 555 a.m. peak hour, 797 p.m. peak hour, and 10,280 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction applied to all land uses except general retail (based on ITE methodology). Table 2 Trip Generation Estimates (Proposed Development Plan The Grove 2019) Land Use (ITE Code) Clinic (630) M PM Units Size Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 26, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips General Retail (820) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 3 (934) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 4 (934) Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (937) utomobile Parts and Service Center (943) Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market (945) Gross Land rea (SF) 83, ,158 Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 2 Land Use Gross Trips ,158 Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,272 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, ,798 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,348 Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,092 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,568 Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Fueling Stations (E) ,286 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,464 Subtotal Gross Trips Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction. 3: Taco Bell is open for breakfast in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea. 4: Raising Cane's is not open for breakfast in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea , , ,280 From the results of the trip generation estimates for The Grove, a comparison of peak hour and total daily trips for the two development scenarios was made with the findings summarized in Table 3. The proposed development plan, which includes existing land uses and the proposed Taco Bell restaurant, is expected to increase trips over the original development plan by at least 31 percent during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis.

57 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 5 of 7 Table 3 Comparison of Development Scenarios (The Grove) Development Scenario M Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Total Gross Trips % Increase Total Gross Trips % Increase Total Gross Trips % Increase Original Development Plan (2006) 330 N/ 607 N/ 6,612 N/ Proposed Development Plan (2019) % % 10, % Despite an increase in anticipated trips over the a.m. and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis, intersections surrounding The Grove retail center have demonstrated acceptable operations to this point (Level-of-Service C or better during the weekday peak hours). Furthermore, year 2020 and year 2025 operations forecasts completed for the Maple Grove Caribou Coffee Development Traffic Impact Study (completed by lliant in October 2018) indicate surrounding intersections are expected to continue operating at overall LOS C or better 1. Trip Generation Comparison (Taco Bell Parcel) Trips were also estimated specifically for the proposed Taco Bell parcel from original year 2006 development plan, which included a general retail land use (8,300 square feet). Original Development Plan (Taco Bell Parcel) summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the original development plan over the weekday a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 4. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the original general retail land use would have been expected to generate approximately 8 a.m. peak hour, 32 midday peak hour, 32 p.m. peak hour, and 314 daily trips. Table 4 Trip Generation Estimates (Original Development Plan Taco Bell Parcel 2006) M MIDDY PM Land Use Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 2 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Units Size (ITE Code) Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 8, General Retail Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 3 (820) Land Use Gross Trips Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hour using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction. 1 Maple Grove Caribou Coffee Development Traffic Impact Study, lliant Engineering (Jordan Schwarze) October 2018

58 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 6 of 7 Proposed Development Plan (Taco Bell Parcel) Trips were then estimated specifically for the proposed Taco Bell (2,701 square-foot restaurant with drive-through). summary of estimated site-generated vehicle trips for the proposed Taco Bell over the weekday a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis is shown in Table 5. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the proposed Taco Bell is expected to generate approximately 81 a.m. peak hour, 113 midday peak hour, 65 p.m. peak hour, and 954 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction (based on ITE methodology). Table 5 Trip Generation Estimates (Proposed Development Plan Taco Bell Parcel 2019) Land Use (ITE Code) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) M MIDDY PM Units Size Peak Hour Trips 1 Peak Hour Trips 2 Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,272 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hour using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: 25 percent multi-use reduction was applied to be consistent with previous traffic studies within "The Grove". From the results of the trip generation estimates for the proposed Taco Bell parcel, a comparison of peak hour and total daily trips for the two development scenarios was made. The proposed Taco Bell development is expected to increase trips over the originally planned general retail land use during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis. However, it should be noted that other parcels within The Grove retail center have been developed as higher-generating land uses, several of which were illustrated previously in Figure 1. Furthermore, intersections surrounding the proposed Taco Bell development are expected to demonstrate acceptable operations into the near- and mid-term future. review of the year 2025 model created for the Maple Grove Caribou Coffee Development Traffic Impact Study indicated that intersections surrounding The Grove retail center are expected to continue operating at LOS C or better during the weekday peak hours with the inclusion of Taco Bell site-generated trips.

59 Zach Zelickson, Border Foods pril 16, 2019 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Trip Generation Memo Page 7 of 7 Drive-Through ssessment review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding the drive-through geometry and capacity. Per the site plan, the proposed drive-through lane shows capacity for approximately 8 passenger vehicles. Local research into fast-food drive-through queuing 2 indicates the 85th percentile queues observed over multiple sites in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea was 12 vehicles (i.e. 240 feet). While the potential exists for peak queuing to exceed the available 8 vehicle capacity, additional queues would extend internal to the site, thus avoiding obstruction of either The Grove South ccess or adjacent developments. Furthermore, sufficient parking is provided onsite for those individuals who might decide to exit their vehicles and enter the Taco Bell rather than wait in the drive-through lane queue. lthough it would be advisable for the proposed Taco Bell to provide queueing capacity for 12 vehicles within the drive-through lane, there is likely room for additional vehicles to queue onsite without obstructing internal driving lanes. Therefore, no significant drive-through queuing issues are anticipated. Conclusions The proposed Taco Bell development is expected to increase trips over the originally planned general retail land use on the same parcel during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis. However, it should be noted that other parcels within The Grove retail center have been developed as higher-generating land uses as compared to the original development plan. Furthermore, intersections surrounding the proposed Taco Bell development are expected to demonstrate acceptable operations (LOS C or better during weekday peak hours) into the near- and mid-term future. Finally, no significant Taco Bell drive-through queuing issues are anticipated. S:\2019\190041\DOCS\MG Taco Bell_TG Memo_ docx 2 Drive-Through Queue Generation, Counting Cars (Mike Spack, Max Moreland, Lindsay de Leeuw, Nate Hood), February 2012,

60 Maple Grove Taco Bell Development - Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove, MN Prepared For: Zach Zelickson Border Foods 5425 Boone venue N New Hope, MN Prepared By: Jordan Schwarze, PE Nick Grage, PE Draft Report Version 2 June 4, 2019 lliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette ve, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402

61 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Table of Contents List of Figures... ii List of Tables... ii 1.0 Introduction Existing Conditions STUDY RE INTERSECTIONS DT COLLECTION Traffic Volumes Roadway/ Characteristics Pedestrian/Bicycle ccommodations INTERSECTION CPCITY NLYSIS Proposed Development TRIP GENERTION ITE Trip Generation Current Development Plan (2020) ITE Trip Generation Potential Future Development Plan (2025) Background Traffic Growth TRIP DISTRIBUTION ND SSIGNMENT Year 2020 Build Conditions RODWY NETWORK SSUMPTIONS INTERSECTION CPCITY NLYSIS Year 2025 Build Conditions RODWY NETWORK SSUMPTIONS INTERSECTION CPCITY NLYSIS Site Plan Review Conclusions/Recommendations...19 ppendix Detailed Operations and Queuing nalysis... lliant No June 4, 2019 i

62 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development List of Figures Figure 1. Project Location... 2 Figure 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Figure 3. Proposed Site Plan... 7 Figure 4. Proposed Development Directional Distribution Figure 5. dditional Planned Development Directional Distribution Figure 6. Year 2020 Build Conditions Figure 7. Year 2025 Build Conditions List of Tables Table 1 Roadway Characteristics... 3 Table 2 Characteristics... 3 Table 3 Level of Service Criteria... 5 Table 4 Existing Capacity nalysis... 6 Table 5 Trip Generation Estimates (Current Development Plan)... 9 Table 6 Trip Generation Estimates (Potential Future Development Plan) Table 7 Year 2020 Build Capacity nalysis Table 8 Year 2025 Build Capacity nalysis lliant No June 4, 2019 ii

63 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 1.0 Introduction lliant Engineering has completed a traffic impact study for the proposed Taco Bell development located in The Grove retail center adjacent to Maple Grove Parkway in northwestern Maple Grove, MN (see Figure 1). The proposed development consists of a 2,701 square-foot Taco Bell restaurant with a drive-through. The main objectives of this study are to evaluate existing traffic operations within the study area, identify any potential traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and recommend improvements to address issues if necessary. The following provides the assumptions, analysis, and study conclusions/recommendations offered for consideration. 2.0 Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline for identifying any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes turning movement counts, field observations, and an intersection capacity analysis. 2.1 Study rea s Through discussions with public stakeholders, the following study intersections were identified: Maple Grove Parkway & & (The Grove) North ccess & (The Grove) Central ccess & (The Grove) South ccess 2.2 Data Collection Traffic Volumes To document existing conditions, intersection turning movement counts were collected by lliant Engineering during the week of July 30, 2018 over the following time periods: M Peak Period: 7:00-9:00 a.m. Midday Peak Period: 11:30-1:30 p.m. PM Peak Period: 4:00-6:00 p.m. It should be noted that intersection turning movement counts were collected prior to the opening of Raising Cane s on ugust 7, Consequently, trip generation estimates for Raising Cane s have been included in current and potential future development analysis scenarios. lliant No June 4, 2019

64

65 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Roadway/ Characteristics In addition to traffic volume data collection, observations were completed to identify roadway/ intersection characteristics within the study area (i.e. geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls), which are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Existing geometry, traffic controls, and peak hour traffic volumes within the study area are shown in Figure 2. Table 1 Roadway Characteristics Roadway Cross-Section Speed Limit Functional Classification Maple Grove Parkway 4-Lane Divided w/ Dedicated Turn Lanes 40 mph Minor rterial 4-Lane Divided w/ Dedicated Turn Lanes 30 mph Local Table 2 Characteristics Lane Designations by pproach (1) Traffic Control NB SB EB WB Maple Grove Parkway & (2) Traffic Signal L/L/T/T/R L/T/T/R L/T/R L/TR & North ccess Side-Street Stop - R T/T T/TR & Central ccess Side-Street Stop LT/R LT/TR L/T/TR L/T/TR & South ccess Side-Street Stop LTR LTR L/T/TR L/T/TR (1) L=Left-Turn, T=Through, R=Right-Turn (2) Maple Grove Parkway/ intersection east leg functions as a driveway for the Parkway Station Park & Ride It should be noted that to simplify the analysis process throughout this traffic impact study Maple Grove Parkway will be defined as a northbound/southbound roadway (geographically runs northeast/southwest) and will be defined as an eastbound/westbound roadway (geographically runs northwest/southeast). s a result, the North ccess, Central ccess, and South ccess driveways are all considered northbound/southbound roadways for the purpose of this study Pedestrian/Bicycle ccommodations Existing pedestrian/bicycle accommodations in the vicinity of the proposed development were also documented. t the Maple Grove Parkway/ intersection, pedestrian pushbutton activated phasing is available across all four intersection approaches. shared-use path extends along both the east and west sides of Maple Grove Parkway throughout the study area, while a sidewalk runs along the south side of. lliant No June 4, 2019

66

67 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 2.3 Capacity nalysis n existing intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations could be compared. Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS), which indicates the quality of traffic flow through an intersection. s are given a ranking from LOS through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 3. LOS indicates the best traffic operation, with vehicles experiencing minimal delays. LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity, or a breakdown of traffic flow. The LOS D/E boundary for overall operations is often used as the indicator of congestion in an urban area. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, a key measure of operational effectiveness is the side-street LOS. Long delays and poor LOS can occur on side-street approaches even if the overall intersection is functioning well, making side-street LOS a valuable design criterion. Table 3 Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Description Delay per Vehicle (seconds) Signalized Unsignalized Free Flow: Low volumes and no delays B Stable Flow: Speeds restricted by travel conditions, minor delays. > > C D E F Stable Flow: Speeds and maneuverability closely controlled due to higher volumes. Stable Flow: Speeds considerably affected by change in operating conditions. High density traffic restricts maneuverability, volume near capacity. Unstable Flow: Low speeds, considerable delay, volume at or slightly over capacity. Forced Flow: Very low speeds, volume exceed capacity, long delays with stop and go traffic. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 Edition, Transportation Research Board, Exhibits 18-4 & > > > > > > > 80 > 50 fter LOS, the second component of the capacity analysis is a study of vehicular queuing, or the lineup of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. n intersection can operate with an acceptable LOS, but if queues from the intersection block entrances to turn lanes or adjacent driveways, unsafe operating conditions could result. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with only a five (5) percent probability of being exceeded during an analysis period, is considered the standard for design purposes. The existing intersection capacity analysis was performed for the study intersections over the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours (within the 7:00-9:00 a.m., 11:30-1:30 p.m., and 4:00-6:00 p.m. timeframes respectively) as observed by lliant Engineering during the week of July 30, lliant No June 4, 2019

68 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis presented in Table 4 indicate that all study intersections currently operate at overall LOS B or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side-street delay or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulations. Detailed operations and queuing analysis results are presented in ppendix. Table 4 Existing Capacity nalysis Maple Grove Parkway & B / C 11.9 / 34.5 B / C 14.8 / 26.2 B / D 18.0 / 38.4 & North ccess / 0.2 / 0.3 / 0.2 / 4.0 / 0.2 / 2.4 & Central ccess / 1.5 / 5.2 / 1.9 / 6.3 / 1.7 / 6.4 & South ccess / 2.3 / 6.6 / 2.7 / 9.3 / 2.8 / 7.9 Overall LOS / Worst Overall Delay / Worst pproach Delay M Peak Hour MID Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) 3.0 Proposed Development The current Taco Bell development proposal (shown in Figure 3) consists of the following: 2,701-square-foot Taco Bell restaurant with a drive-through window No definitive timeline has been established for construction of the development, though a year 2020 completion was assumed for the purpose of this study. Existing access to the proposed development is available at the following two (2) locations: Primary ccess along the South ccess roadway: o Located approximately 130 feet northeast of Secondary ccess along an internal driveway linking the South ccess and Central ccess roadways: o Located approximately 110 feet south of the Central ccess roadway It should be noted that most vehicles are expected to access the proposed development via, though roadway connections internal to The Grove exist to the east. It should also be noted that a crosswalk is planned at the /Central ccess intersection as part of the overall development of The Grove. The crosswalk would provide pedestrians an improved crossing between Maple Grove Hospital and The Grove. lliant No June 4, 2019

69

70 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 3.1 Trip Generation To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates were developed for the weekday a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours as well as on a daily basis. The trip generation estimates were developed utilizing trip generation rates for similar land uses as documented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10 th Edition ITE Trip Generation Current Development Plan (2020) The ITE Trip Generation Manual was utilized to estimate the trip generation potential for the proposed development as well as for additional developments that will be built or are currently being built near the proposed development. Estimated site generated traffic based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual is detailed in Table 5. dditional developments considered for the purpose of estimating the year 2020 trip generation: Caribou Coffee o 2,549-square-foot Caribou Coffee/Einstein Bros Bagels with Drive-Through Window Raising Cane s (opened ugust 7, 2018 after traffic counts were collected): o 3,819-square-foot Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window Hy-Vee Development: o The proposed Hy-Vee development is located in the northeast quadrant of the Maple Grove Parkway/Grove Circle intersection. This development is expected to consist of a 96,000 square-foot Supermarket and a 4,100 square-foot Gas Station/ Convenience Store. The development is also expected to incorporate a Mid-Rise partment complex of up to 150 dwelling units. Territorial Woods Development: o The Territorial Woods development (currently under construction) is a mix of highand medium-density housing with 167 dwelling units (98 apartments and 69 townhomes) located nearly a mile northeast of the study area. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the current development plan (including the Raising Cane s trips) is expected to generate approximately 251 a.m. peak hour, 418 midday peak hour, 242 p.m. peak hour, and 3,870 daily trips. Based on the methodology described in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, these trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction. It should be noted that a portion of the development trips are expected to be from motorists already traveling within the study area, primarily along Maple Grove Parkway, who will now divert their trip to the proposed development before continuing to their destination (i.e. passby trips). Pass-by percentages for each land use were referenced in the ITE Trip Generation Manual and applied to all land uses. Taking into account pass-by trips, the resultant net new traffic volume impact to the adjacent roadway network is estimated to be approximately 57 a.m. peak hour, 170 midday peak hour, 86 p.m. peak hour, and 1,322 daily trips for the current development plan. lliant No June 4, 2019

71 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Table 5 Trip Generation Estimates (Current Development Plan) Land Use (ITE Code) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (934) Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window 3 (934) Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (937) Hy-Vee Supermarket/C-Store Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise (221) Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise (221) Multifamily Housing Low-Rise (220) Units Size M Peak Hour Trips 1 MID Peak Hour Trips 2 PM Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips The Grove Developments Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,272 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (50%) Land Use Net Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 3, ,798 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,348 Pass-By Trips (50%) Land Use Net Trips Gross Floor rea (SF) 2, ,092 Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips ,568 Pass-By Trips (89%) ,396 Land Use Net Trips The Grove Developments Totals Subtotal Gross Trips Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips Pass-By Trips Net New Trips Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (50%) Land Use Net Trips , , , , ,322 Other Developments , , ,536 Dwelling Unit Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Dwelling Unit Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Dwelling Unit Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Other Developments Totals Subtotal Gross Trips ,924 Multi-Use Reduction Not pplicable Development Gross Trips ,924 Pass-By Trips ,536 Net New Trips ,388 Source: Existing Brooklyn Park, MN Hy-Vee observations and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Note: Pass-By Trips and Multi-Use Reduction only applied where applicable. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hours using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: Raising Cane's is not open for breakfast in the Twin Cities Metropolitan rea. lliant No June 4, 2019

72 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Meanwhile, the nearby Hy-Vee and Territorial Woods developments are expected to generate approximately 533 a.m. peak hour, 662 midday peak hour, 960 p.m. peak hour, and 10,924 daily trips. To provide conservative trip generation estimates for the nearby developments, no multi-use reduction was applied. Taking into account pass-by trips, the resultant net new traffic volume impact to the adjacent roadway network is estimated to be approximately 327 a.m. peak hour, 376 midday peak hour, 554 p.m. peak hour, and 6,388 daily trips for the nearby developments ITE Trip Generation Potential Future Development Plan (2025) The potential exists for future development within The Grove, including a 63-room hotel, a +5,000-square-foot medical/dental office building, 100,000 square feet of self-storage, and approximately 60,000 square feet of additional retail space. The ITE Trip Generation Manual was again utilized to estimate the trip generation potential for the potential future development plan, including the hotel, medical/dental office building, self-storage, and additional retail space. Estimated site generated traffic based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual is detailed in Table 6. Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the potential future development plan is expected to generate approximately 94 a.m. peak hour, 288 midday peak hour, 272 p.m. peak hour, and 2,795 daily trips. These trip generation estimates include a 25 percent multi-use reduction applied to all land uses except general retail (based on the methodology described in the ITE Trip Generation Manual). Pass-by percentages for each land use were again referenced in the ITE Trip Generation Manual and applied as appropriate. Taking into account pass-by trips, the resultant net new traffic volume impact to the adjacent roadway network is estimated to be approximately 76 a.m. peak hour, 206 midday peak hour, 198 p.m. peak hour, and 2,063 daily trips Background Traffic Growth Historical annual average daily traffic (DT) volumes were provided by MnDOT via its Traffic Forecasting & nalysis website, while forecast volumes were provided in the draft City of Maple Grove 2040 Comprehensive Plan. To account for continued traffic volume growth within the study area outside of the planned/proposed developments documented in this study, an annual growth rate of one (1) percent was applied to existing traffic volumes to provide a conservative estimate of future conditions. lliant No June 4, 2019

73 Table 6 Trip Generation Estimates (Potential Future Development Plan) Land Use (ITE Code) Mini-Warehouse (151) Hotel 3 (310) Medical-Dental Office Building (720) General Retail 3 (820) 3.2 Trip Distribution and ssignment Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Units Size M Peak Hour Trips 1 MID Peak Hour Trips 2 PM Peak Hour Trips 1 Daily Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips Trips Total Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips In Out Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 100, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Rooms Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 5, Multi-Use Reduction (25%) Land Use Gross Trips Pass-By Trips (N/) Not pplicable Land Use Net Trips Gross Land rea (SF) 57, ,154 Multi-Use Reduction (N/) Not pplicable 4 Land Use Gross Trips ,154 Pass-By Trips (34%) Land Use Net Trips ,422 Subtotal Gross Trips ,009 Multi-Use Reduction Development Gross Trips ,795 Pass-By Trips Net New Trips ,063 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Note: Pass-By Trips and Multi-Use Reduction only applied where applicable. 1: Trips generated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent roadway network. 2: Trips generated for the midday peak hours using ppendix of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. 3: Potential future hotel development would remove approximately 8,328 square feet of existing General Retail space, resulting in a net loss of retail space south of Grove Circle. General Retail space, including the 60,000 square feet of additional retail space planned north of Grove Circle, was adjusted accordingly. 4: General Retail (Shopping Center) raw trip generation data inherently includes a multi-use reduction. The distribution of site-generated traffic was estimated based on a review of existing traffic volumes/patterns and engineering judgement. The estimated proposed development directional distribution is shown in Figure 4, while the estimated additional planned development directional distribution is shown in Figure 5. These trip distributions were applied to the respective estimated site-generated traffic volumes to forecast year 2020 build conditions (current development plan) and year 2025 build conditions (potential future development plan). The resultant year 2020 and year 2025 build traffic forecasts are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7 respectively. lliant No June 4, 2019

74

75

76

77

78 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 4.0 Year 2020 Build Conditions To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, year 2020 build conditions (i.e. estimated current development plan completion) were evaluated. 4.1 Roadway Network ssumptions For the year 2020 build conditions analysis, several roadway network assumptions were made: Proposed developments under the 2020 build conditions include: o Taco Bell o Caribou Coffee/Einstein Bros Bagels o Raising Cane s (opened ugust 7, 2018 after traffic counts were collected) o Hy-Vee Development o Territorial Woods Development Maple Grove Parkway traffic signal timing and phasing improvements previously recommended under a different study were assumed to be implemented. 4.2 Capacity nalysis To understand the extent to which the proposed development impacts the study area roadway network, the forecasted year 2020 build conditions were analyzed. Results of the year 2020 build intersection capacity analysis presented in Table 7 indicate that all study intersections are expected to operate at overall LOS C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours under the baseline roadway network assumptions. Moderate 95th percentile queues (~150 feet) are anticipated on the South ccess approach to during the midday peak hour. These queues may result in brief blockages of the primary Taco Bell access, though inbound motorists will still have the ability to continue to the secondary site access. Nonetheless, Do Not Block signs should be installed at the primary site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. Detailed operations and queuing analysis results are presented in ppendix. Table 7 Year 2020 Build Capacity nalysis Maple Grove Parkway & B / D 14.6 / 38.9 B / C 15.9 / 24.8 C / D 22.4 / 43.2 & North ccess / 0.1 / 0.2 / 0.2 / 2.3 / 0.2 / 2.4 & Central ccess / 1.6 / 5.3 / 2.1 / 7.4 / 1.7 / 6.2 & South ccess / B 3.7 / 10.2 / C 6.0 / 16.6 / B 4.6 / 11.5 Overall LOS / Worst Overall Delay / Worst pproach Delay M Peak Hour MID Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) lliant No June 4, 2019

79 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 5.0 Year 2025 Build Conditions To help determine impacts associated with the potential future development, year 2025 build conditions (i.e. estimated potential future development plan completion) were evaluated. 5.1 Roadway Network ssumptions For the year 2025 build conditions analysis, several roadway network assumptions were made: Proposed developments under the 2025 build conditions include: o Taco Bell o Caribou Coffee/Einstein Bros Bagels o Raising Cane s (opened ugust 7, 2018 after traffic counts were collected) o Crimsoncare Dental & Medical Office (5,089 SF) o Hy-Vee Development o Territorial Woods Development o Hotel (63 rooms) The potential hotel development would be expected to displace approximately 8,328 square-feet of existing retail space. o Self-Storage (100,000 SF) & Retail Space (57,072 SF) Trips generated by additional retail space within The Grove (5,400 SF) and a small portion of the 60,000 SF retail space were offset by the displacement of existing retail space resulting from the potential hotel development a net gain of 57,072 SF of retail space for No change in Maple Grove Parkway traffic signal timing and phasing was made from the year 2020 build conditions. 5.2 Capacity nalysis To understand the extent to which the potential future development impacts the study area roadway network, the forecasted year 2025 build conditions were analyzed. Results of the year 2025 build intersection capacity analysis presented in Table 8 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at overall LOS C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours under the baseline roadway network assumptions. Moderate 95th percentile queues (~150 to 175 feet) are anticipated on the South ccess approach to during the midday and p.m. peak hours. These queues may result in brief blockages of the primary Taco Bell access, though inbound motorists will still have the ability to continue to the secondary site access. s previously recommended, Do Not Block signs should be installed at the primary site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. Detailed operations and queuing analysis results are presented in ppendix. lliant No June 4, 2019

80 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development Table 8 Year 2025 Build Capacity nalysis M Peak Hour MID Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) LOS Delay (s) Maple Grove Parkway & B / C 15.5 / 34.0 C / C 21.2 / 23.5 C / D 26.4 / 42.4 & North ccess / 0.2 / 0.2 / 0.1 / 2.5 / 0.2 / 2.5 & Central ccess / 1.7 / 6.1 / 1.8 / 7.7 / 1.6 / 7.4 & South ccess / B 4.2 / 12.5 / C 7.0 / 22.7 / C 6.8 / 22.6 Overall LOS / Worst Overall Delay / Worst pproach Delay 6.0 Site Plan Review review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements regarding vehicle ingress/egress, drive-through capacity, and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity. The following conclusions/recommendations should be considered: Truck turning movements should be reviewed to ensure that delivery and garbage/recycling trucks have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. The proposed drive-through lane provides capacity for approximately eight (8) passenger vehicles. While a slight potential exists for peak queuing to exceed this capacity, maximum queues are likely to extend internal to the site, thus avoiding obstruction of The Grove internal roadways. o Furthermore, sufficient parking is provided onsite for those individuals who might decide to exit their vehicles and enter the Taco Bell rather than wait in the drive-through lane queue. crosswalk is planned at the /Central ccess intersection as part of the overall development of The Grove. Under current conditions, pedestrians would cross five lanes of motor vehicle traffic to traverse. Therefore, a center median island refuge should be considered to allow pedestrians to cross in two stages with only one direction of motor vehicle traffic potentially conflicting at a time. lliant No June 4, 2019

81 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development 7.0 Conclusions/Recommendations The following study conclusions/recommendations are offered for consideration: Results of the year 2020 and year 2025 build intersection capacity analyses indicate that all study intersections are expected to operate at overall LOS C or better during the a.m., midday, and p.m. peak hours. Moderate queuing may occur on the South ccess approach to during the midday and p.m. peak hours. Therefore, the installation of Do Not Block signs is recommended at the primary Taco Bell site access intersection to avoid impacting Taco Bell, Steve s uto World, and Caribou Coffee ingress/egress. Recommendations related to proposed development vehicle ingress/egress, drive-through capacity, and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity are listed in Section 6.0: Site Plan Review. lliant No June 4, 2019

82 Traffic Impact Study Maple Grove Taco Bell Development ppendix Detailed Operations and Queuing nalysis lliant No ppendix

83 2018 Existing - M Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS E B D D B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B 34.5 C 12.7 B 10.0

84 2018 Existing - MID Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D D D B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B 26.2 C 17.0 B 11.8 B

85 2018 Existing - PM Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D E E E B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C D C B

86 2020 Build - M Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D C B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C 38.9 D 15.5 B 10.1 B

87 2020 Build - MID Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS C C C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C 17.1 B 17.1 B 7.4

88 2020 Build - PM Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D C D E B E D B C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C D C B

89 2025 Build - M Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B B B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B D E B D D B Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C C B 10.8 B

90 2025 Build - MID Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B C C C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS D B C D B C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C 18.0 B 23.5 C 16.7 B

91 2025 Build - PM Peak Hour & South ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS B C C D Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) B C & Central ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) & North ccess Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) Maple Grove Parkway & Eastbound pproach Westbound pproach Northbound pproach Southbound pproach Movement Delay (sec/veh) Total Delay (hr) Movement LOS C C D E B E B E B B C Movement Volume Movement 95th Queue (ft) Storage Bay Distance (ft) C D C B

92 Exhibit : Recommended Traffic-Related Improvements Signing & Striping