Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Wroclaw Branch PP 10 Wrocław, 28-29 June 2007
4. Water resources management 4.2 - Assessments of the hydrological characteristics of the Polish territory during different climatic conditions. Estimation of water resources in flood, drought and average conditions. Assignment of the amount of minimal discharge.
TIMETABLE No Particular action in No of month IV V VI VII Climatic characteristics: space-time variability of precipitation, space-time variability of temperature, calculation of climatic water balance, frequency of period without rain Hydrological drought characteristics: low flow characteristics (percentiles from flow duration curve, recession indices, base flow indices), deficit characteristics (deficit volume and duration), probability of non exceedance of deficit and duration), minimum flow Flood characteristics: threshold level method, flood frequency analysis, calculation of annual maximum discharges with given probability of exceedance Hydrological average conditions characteristics: mean flow from multiyear VII. 2006 II. 2007 VIII. 2006 II. 2007 I. 2007 - VI. 2007 IV. 2007 - VI. 2007 Expenses I-VI.2007 - app. 28 000 euro
LOCATION OF CHOSEN CATCHMENTS IN POLAND TERRITORY Pisa catchment: lacustrine catchment 4061 km 2 area Prosna catchment: agricultural catchment 4712 km 2 area Nysa Kłodzka catchment reservoirs catchment 4712 km 2 area Kłodnica catchment: urbanized catchment 1055 km 2 area Dunajec catchment: natural catchment 4341 km 2 area
ANNUAL PRECIPITATION TOTALS 1966-2005 Dunajec catchment Nysa Kłodzka catchment
ANNUAL PRECIPITATION TOTALS 1966-2005 Prosna catchment Pisa catchment Kłodnica catchment
ANNUAL TEMPERATURE 1966-2005 Dunajec catchment Nysa Klodzka catchment Prosna catchment
ANNUAL CLIMATIC WATER BALANCE 1966-2005 Prosna catchment Kłodnica catchment Nysa Kłodzka catchment
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 PISA BASIN PROSNA BASIN NYSA KŁODZKA BASIN No of low flows Pisz Ptaki Dobrylas Ukta Mikosze total 5-10 days 11-20 days 21-30 days over 30 days 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mirków Piwonice Bogusław Kuźnica Skakawska Ołobok No of low flows total 5-10 days 11-20 days 21-30 days over 30 days 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DUNAJEC BASIN KŁODNICA BASIN 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Nowy Targ - Cz.Dunajec Nowy Targ - Kowaniec Kościelisko- Kiry Ludźmierz Zakopane- Harenda Szaflary Łysa Polana Kłodnica Gliwice - Kłodnica Lenartowice Gliwice - Bytomka No of low flows No of low flows Międzylesie Bystrzyca Kł. Kłodzko Bardo Nysa Kopice Skorogoszcz Wilkanów Bystrzyca Lądek Zdrój Żelazno Szalejów Tłumaczów Gorzuchów No of low flows Głuchołazy HYDROLOGICAL DROUGHT CHARACTERISTICS the number of low flows in 1966-2005 with class division total 5-10 days 11-20 days 21-30 days over 30 days total 5-10 days 11-20 days 21-30 days over 30 days total 5-10 days 11-20 days 21-30 days over 30 days
HYDROLOGICAL DROUGHT CHARACTERISTICS the type of low flow (ratio of summer to winter number of low flow cases for period 1966-2005) Assumption: Nl/Nz 0,5 - winter type Nl/Nz < 0,51 1,0> - mixed type with winter low flows Nl/Nz < 1,01 2,0> - mixed type with Nl/Nz 2,01 - summer type Gauge Station River Low flow in period 1966-2005 (days) Summer season low flow (Nl) (days) Winter season low flows (Nz) (days) Ratio Nl/Nz Type of low flow Międzylesie 2936 2950 993 2,97 summer type Bystrzyca Kłodzka 2679 2791 1259 2,22 summer type Kłodzko 2435 2525 1529 1,65 Bardo Nysa Kłodzka 2692 2896 1085 2,67 summer type Nysa 1822 1734 2231 0,78 winter type Kopice 1840 1770 2092 0,85 winter type Skorogoszcz 1873 2019 1985 1,02 Wilkanów Wilczka 2424 2501 1535 1,63 Bystrzyca Kł. Bystrzyca 2917 3052 1272 2,39 summer type Lądek Zdrój Biała Lądecka 1926 1934 2153 0,89 winter low flows Żelazno 1977 1972 2192 0,90 winter low flows Szalejów Dolny Bystrzyca Dusznicka 2842 2915 1130 2,60 summer type Tłumaczów 3016 3305 789 3,09 summer type Ścinawka Gorzuchów 2858 3003 1067 2,81 summer type Głuchołazy Biała 2047 2007 2066 0,97 Głuchołaska winter low flows
HYDROLOGICAL DROUGHT CHARACTERISTICS the type of low flow (ratio of summer to winter number of low flow cases for period 1966-2005) Assumption: Nl/Nz 0,5 - winter type Nl/Nz < 0,51 1,0> - mixed type with winter low flows Nl/Nz < 1,01 2,0> - mixed type with Nl/Nz 2,01 - summer type Gauge Station River Low flow in period 1966-2005 (days) Summer season low flow (Nl) (days) Winter season low flows (Nz) (days) Ratio Nl/Nz Type of low flow Dobrylas Pisa 1322 827 495 1,67 Ptaki Pisa 4106 2595 1511 1,71 Pisz Pisz 2878 1885 993 1,90 Ukta Krutynia 4079 3411 668 5,11 summer type Mikosze Orzysza 3166 2480 686 3,62 summer type Kłodnica Kłodznica 3624 2292 1332 1,71 Gliwice Bytomka 4042 2538 1504 1,69 Gliwice Kłodnica 3821 2529 1294 1,96 Lenartowice Kłodnica 3847 1914 1933 0,99 winter type Lysa Polana Białka 5588 471 5117 0,09 winter type Szaflary Biały Dunajec 4224 899 3325 0,27 winter type Zakopane-Harenda Cicha Woda 4069 657 3412 0,19 winter type Ludźmierz Wielki Rogoźnik 4291 2043 2248 0,91 winter type Kościelisko-Kiry Potok Kościeliski 5610 652 4958 0,13 winter type Nowy Targ- Kowaniec Dunajec 4182 985 3197 0,31 winter type Nowy Targ Czarny Dunajec 4149 1089 3060 0,36 winter type
HYDROLOGICAL DROUGHT CHARACTERISTICS max. deficit volume and pp of 00 deficit occurrence River Nysa Kłodzka Gauge station The low flow extreme Deficit Duration [tys. m 3 ] no.of days pp Dv=0 [%] Międzylesie 2471 178 11 Bystrzyca Kł. 9563 137 9 Kłodzko 47473 157 18 Bardo 70242 156 16 Nysa 69827 168 12 Kopice 80419 145 15 Skorogoszcz 87696 140 13 Wilczy Potok Wilkanów 6086 258 24 Bystrzyca Bystrzyca 3903 157 18 Biała Lądecka Lądek Zdrój 9839 153 27 Żelazno 15170 155 24 Bystrzyca Dusz. Szalejów Dolny 4952 136 12 Ścinawka Tłumaczów 10956 211 16 Gorzuchów 16518 150 14 Biała Głuchołaska Głuchołazy 14632 168 25 Kłodnica 4654 130 19 Kłodnica Gliwice 19324 130 9 Lenartowice 51338 247 28 Bytomka Gliwice 10586 222 22 Czarny Dunajec Nowy Targ 13637 112 32 Kowaniec Nowy Targ 18448 94 29 Potok Kościelski Kościelisko-Kiry 1670 49 - Wielki Rogoźnik Ludźmierz 5015 125 12 Cicha Woda Zakopane-Harenda 1472 68 39 Biały Dunajec Szaflary 6377 72 33 Białka Tatrzańska Łysa Polana 1072 48 - Pisz 65705 164 45 Pisa Ptaki 136740 269 48 Dobrylas 163095 272 42 Krutynica Ukta 18227 176 32 Orzysza Mikosze 13516 238 39 Mirków 30194 214 6 Prosna Piwonice 60862 220 14 Bogusław 63166 203 13 Niesób Kuźnica Skakawska 4808 205 13 Ołobok Ołobok 7632 249 24
HYDROLOGICAL DROUGHT CHARACTERISTICS the ratio of dynamic deficiency of water in basin (Dvmax/A)
FLOOD CHARACTERISTICS - frequency The floods frequency is defined as the floods quantity with a peak discharges higher than the value of the boundary discharge defined as the discharge responding to the alarm water level specified for the river cross section River Gauge station the numer of floods [-] Dunajec Nowy Targ Kowaniec 6 Biały Dunajec Szaflary 2 Czarny Dunajec Nowy Targ 13 Wielki Rogoźnik Ludźmierz 2 Potok Kościeliski Kościelisko Kiry 0 Białka Łysa Polana 3 Cicha Woda Zakopane Harenda 15
FLOOD CHARACTERISTICS - the classification of flood s types Classification of foods types criteria catastrophic great Q 5% < Q max great Q 10% < Q max Q 5% average great Q 50% < Q max Q 10% ordinary [(Q śr +Q 50% )/2] < Q max Q 50% lack of flood Q max [(Q śr +Q 50% )/2] River Gauge station ordinary flood averange great flood great flood catastrophic great flood Dunajec Nowy Targ 32 13 0 0 Kowaniec Biały Szaflary 29 10 1 0 Dunajec Czarny Nowy Targ 38 13 1 0 Dunajec Wielki Rogoźnik Ludźmierz 55 25 2 0 Potok Kościelisko 46 20 2 0 Kościeliski Kiry Białka Łysa Polana 53 14 1 1 Cicha Woda Zakopane Harenda 48 18 0 0