Warsztaty szkoleniowe dla pocz Warszawa tkuj cych planuj cych start w konkursach Programów CIP-ICT PSP oraz FP7 ICT

Podobne dokumenty
Ekspert Horizon2020: doświadczenie z oceny wniosków

ERASMUS + : Trail of extinct and active volcanoes, earthquakes through Europe. SURVEY TO STUDENTS.

Zakopane, plan miasta: Skala ok. 1: = City map (Polish Edition)

IOF. Izabela Sabała, IIMCB, Warszawa

MaPlan Sp. z O.O. Click here if your download doesn"t start automatically

Please fill in the questionnaire below. Each person who was involved in (parts of) the project can respond.

Struktura wniosku projektowego w Programie

Biuro Programów Badawczych i Strukturalnych Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego Regionalny Punkt Kontaktowy Programów Badawczych UE przy Uniwersytecie Łódzkim

Ankiety Nowe funkcje! Pomoc Twoje konto Wyloguj. BIODIVERSITY OF RIVERS: Survey to students

Ankiety Nowe funkcje! Pomoc Twoje konto Wyloguj. BIODIVERSITY OF RIVERS: Survey to teachers

SSW1.1, HFW Fry #20, Zeno #25 Benchmark: Qtr.1. Fry #65, Zeno #67. like

Tychy, plan miasta: Skala 1: (Polish Edition)

Wybrzeze Baltyku, mapa turystyczna 1: (Polish Edition)

Karpacz, plan miasta 1:10 000: Panorama Karkonoszy, mapa szlakow turystycznych (Polish Edition)

Helena Boguta, klasa 8W, rok szkolny 2018/2019

Uwagi ewaluatorów wskazówki jak pisać wniosek projektowy

Wroclaw, plan nowy: Nowe ulice, 1:22500, sygnalizacja swietlna, wysokosc wiaduktow : Debica = City plan (Polish Edition)

Katowice, plan miasta: Skala 1: = City map = Stadtplan (Polish Edition)

Wojewodztwo Koszalinskie: Obiekty i walory krajoznawcze (Inwentaryzacja krajoznawcza Polski) (Polish Edition)

Pielgrzymka do Ojczyzny: Przemowienia i homilie Ojca Swietego Jana Pawla II (Jan Pawel II-- pierwszy Polak na Stolicy Piotrowej) (Polish Edition)

Stargard Szczecinski i okolice (Polish Edition)


Karpacz, plan miasta 1:10 000: Panorama Karkonoszy, mapa szlakow turystycznych (Polish Edition)

18. Przydatne zwroty podczas egzaminu ustnego. 19. Mo liwe pytania egzaminatora i przyk³adowe odpowiedzi egzaminowanego

Extraclass. Football Men. Season 2009/10 - Autumn round

Installation of EuroCert software for qualified electronic signature

Procedura oceny wniosków kryteria kwalifikowalności projektów i kryteria oceny

Machine Learning for Data Science (CS4786) Lecture11. Random Projections & Canonical Correlation Analysis

Emilka szuka swojej gwiazdy / Emily Climbs (Emily, #2)

Struktura wniosku projektowego proces ewaluacji i kryteria oceny. Składanie wniosków w w systemie EPSS.

Miedzy legenda a historia: Szlakiem piastowskim z Poznania do Gniezna (Biblioteka Kroniki Wielkopolski) (Polish Edition)

Polska Szkoła Weekendowa, Arklow, Co. Wicklow KWESTIONRIUSZ OSOBOWY DZIECKA CHILD RECORD FORM

What our clients think about us? A summary od survey results

ARNOLD. EDUKACJA KULTURYSTY (POLSKA WERSJA JEZYKOWA) BY DOUGLAS KENT HALL

General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level ADDITIONAL MATHEMATICS 4037/12

Dolny Slask 1: , mapa turystycznosamochodowa: Plan Wroclawia (Polish Edition)

PSB dla masazystow. Praca Zbiorowa. Click here if your download doesn"t start automatically


y = The Chain Rule Show all work. No calculator unless otherwise stated. If asked to Explain your answer, write in complete sentences.

Instrukcja konfiguracji usługi Wirtualnej Sieci Prywatnej w systemie Mac OSX

ANKIETA ŚWIAT BAJEK MOJEGO DZIECKA

European Crime Prevention Award (ECPA) Annex I - new version 2014

Wojewodztwo Koszalinskie: Obiekty i walory krajoznawcze (Inwentaryzacja krajoznawcza Polski) (Polish Edition)

DODATKOWE ĆWICZENIA EGZAMINACYJNE

Analysis of Movie Profitability STAT 469 IN CLASS ANALYSIS #2

Wojewodztwo Koszalinskie: Obiekty i walory krajoznawcze (Inwentaryzacja krajoznawcza Polski) (Polish Edition)

Karpacz, plan miasta 1:10 000: Panorama Karkonoszy, mapa szlakow turystycznych (Polish Edition)

Zdecyduj: Czy to jest rzeczywiście prześladowanie? Czasem coś WYDAJE SIĘ złośliwe, ale wcale takie nie jest.

USB firmware changing guide. Zmiana oprogramowania za przy użyciu połączenia USB. Changelog / Lista Zmian

Weronika Mysliwiec, klasa 8W, rok szkolny 2018/2019

ABOUT NEW EASTERN EUROPE BESTmQUARTERLYmJOURNAL

Formularz recenzji magazynu. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership Review Form

Wojewodztwo Koszalinskie: Obiekty i walory krajoznawcze (Inwentaryzacja krajoznawcza Polski) (Polish Edition)

Machine Learning for Data Science (CS4786) Lecture 11. Spectral Embedding + Clustering

Hard-Margin Support Vector Machines

POLITYKA PRYWATNOŚCI / PRIVACY POLICY

Hakin9 Spam Kings FREEDOMTECHNOLOGYSERVICES.CO.UK

Blow-Up: Photographs in the Time of Tumult; Black and White Photography Festival Zakopane Warszawa 2002 / Powiekszenie: Fotografie w czasach zgielku

Miedzy legenda a historia: Szlakiem piastowskim z Poznania do Gniezna (Biblioteka Kroniki Wielkopolski) (Polish Edition)

Zarządzanie sieciami telekomunikacyjnymi

ZGŁOSZENIE WSPÓLNEGO POLSKO -. PROJEKTU NA LATA: APPLICATION FOR A JOINT POLISH -... PROJECT FOR THE YEARS:.

Dolny Slask 1: , mapa turystycznosamochodowa: Plan Wroclawia (Polish Edition)

Egzamin maturalny z języka angielskiego na poziomie dwujęzycznym Rozmowa wstępna (wyłącznie dla egzaminującego)

Marzec: food, advertising, shopping and services, verb patterns, adjectives and prepositions, complaints - writing

Wojewodztwo Koszalinskie: Obiekty i walory krajoznawcze (Inwentaryzacja krajoznawcza Polski) (Polish Edition)

Raport bieżący: 44/2018 Data: g. 21:03 Skrócona nazwa emitenta: SERINUS ENERGY plc

Proposal of thesis topic for mgr in. (MSE) programme in Telecommunications and Computer Science

Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation

Poland) Wydawnictwo "Gea" (Warsaw. Click here if your download doesn"t start automatically

Domy inaczej pomyślane A different type of housing CEZARY SANKOWSKI

Jak zasada Pareto może pomóc Ci w nauce języków obcych?

Camspot 4.4 Camspot 4.5

Wojewodztwo Koszalinskie: Obiekty i walory krajoznawcze (Inwentaryzacja krajoznawcza Polski) (Polish Edition)


PLSH1 (JUN14PLSH101) General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Examination June Reading and Writing TOTAL

Ilona B. Miles website Terms of Use (ewentualnie: Service)

Surname. Other Names. For Examiner s Use Centre Number. Candidate Number. Candidate Signature

Patients price acceptance SELECTED FINDINGS

NOTICE OF INVITATION TO TENDER FOR THE PURCHASE OF KNITTING MACHINES

INSTRUKCJE JAK AKTYWOWAĆ SWOJE KONTO PAYLUTION

Zakres materiału. les/vocabulary-lesson-culture.php

Leba, Rowy, Ustka, Slowinski Park Narodowy, plany miast, mapa turystyczna =: Tourist map = Touristenkarte (Polish Edition)


X KONKURS PRZEDMIOTOWY Z JĘZYKA ANGIELSKIEGO DLA UCZNIÓW GIMNAZJÓW ZESTAWY PYTAŃ dla ucznia (część ustna).

DO MONTAŻU POTRZEBNE SĄ DWIE OSOBY! INSTALLATION REQUIRES TWO PEOPLE!

EGZAMIN MATURALNY Z JĘZYKA ANGIELSKIEGO POZIOM ROZSZERZONY MAJ 2010 CZĘŚĆ I. Czas pracy: 120 minut. Liczba punktów do uzyskania: 23 WPISUJE ZDAJĄCY

you see decision. oznacza to, Whenever kiedy widzisz biznes, someone once made Za każdym razem, który odnosi sukces,

HAPPY ANIMALS L01 HAPPY ANIMALS L03 HAPPY ANIMALS L05 HAPPY ANIMALS L07

HAPPY ANIMALS L02 HAPPY ANIMALS L04 HAPPY ANIMALS L06 HAPPY ANIMALS L08

deep learning for NLP (5 lectures)

Strategic planning. Jolanta Żyśko University of Physical Education in Warsaw


Teaching activities. improving methods of teaching. improving social students skills. respect to each other. communication through games -

USB firmware changing guide. Zmiana oprogramowania za przy użyciu połączenia USB. Changelog / Lista Zmian

Karpacz, plan miasta 1:10 000: Panorama Karkonoszy, mapa szlakow turystycznych (Polish Edition)

Umowa Licencyjna Użytkownika Końcowego End-user licence agreement

TEST FOR SOBRIETY KONTROLA STANU TRZEŹWOŚCI

LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES

OpenPoland.net API Documentation

Transkrypt:

Praktyczne spostrzeżenia podczas ewaulacji wniosków w ramach FP&7, CIP-ICT oraz AAL Adam Koprowski: koprowski.adam@gmail.com Obszar kompetencji: ehealth, telemedicine, mobile devices, einclusion. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, KSS m. Jana Pawła II, Kraków, Instytut Kardiologii, Warszawa, CSIOZ oraz Ministerstwo Zdrowia, Warszawa, Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny, Warszawa, współpraca: ThinkTank Magazine, Poltransplant, Katedra Informatyki AGH, Cyfronet

Ocena składanych wniosków

Wybór ekspertów

Introduction This tutorial gives guidelines on how to carry out ICT evaluation How to assess the proposal Scoring the proposal Filling in and returning the Individual Evaluation Report (IER)

But first, remember your responsibilities You have signed a non-disclosure agreement Before, during and after the evaluation you do not disclose any information about the proposals we have sent you Keep the proposals secure when not in use You are the evaluator do not pass this responsibility to anybody else do not discuss the proposals with anybody else

But first, remember your responsibilities Do not contact the proposers for clarifications proposals are evaluated on the information that is presented in them, any lack of information will downgrade the score the identities of evaluating experts are never revealed to the proposers concerned Declare any potential conflict of interest If there is a situation which might prevent you evaluating a proposal impartially, click on I cannot evaluate this proposal

The Rivet tool For the remote stage of this evaluation we are using a software tool borrowed from elsewhere in the Framework programme Rivet In Rivet the Individual Evaluation Report (IER) is called the Individual Assessment Report (IAR), but the meaning is the same Save your work regularly, unsaved work is lost if you are idle too long and Rivet times you out. If you are reading, thinking or typing Rivet believes you are idle. Only saving is considered to be an activity! Save at least every 20 minutes

The Evaluation Criteria Proposals are evaluated on three criteria only Scientific and technical quality Implementation Impact Assess the proposal in terms of all three criteria Each criterion is more fully defined by descriptive bullet points, adapted to the instrument type. These are shown on the evaluation form Provide a comment on each of the bullet points (but the bullet points are not scored individually or separately)

The scoring scale First develop your comments on each criterion Then select scores accordingly Each criterion is given a score out of five, corresponding to the explanatory comments A threshold of 3/5 is applied on each criterion An overall score is calculated for each proposal by simple addition A threshold of 10/15 is applied on the overall score Out of scope proposals are given low scores on Criterion 1 Scientific and technical quality Different thresholds, bullet points and a weighting scheme apply in FET Proactive objectives : as shown on the evaluation forms

The scoring scale Use the full scale! Half marks may be given 0 -The proposal fails to address the criterion under examination or cannot be judged due to missing or incomplete information 1 -Poor. The criterion is addressed in an inadequate manner, or there are serious inherent weaknesses 2 -Fair. While the proposal broadly addresses the criterion, there are significant weaknesses 1 3 -Good. The proposal addresses the criterion well, although improvements would be necessary 2 4 -Very good. The proposal addresses the criterion very well, although certain improvements are still possible 2 5 -Excellent. The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion in question. Any shortcomings are minor 1 Problems which can t be solved in grant agreement negotiations 2 Your comments must identify the required improvements

How to fill in IER - General Comments are confined only to the criterion concerned Comments describe only your final view of the proposal Comments are clear and unambiguous. Try to avoid obscure acronyms and technical terms Comments are of adequate length and cover all the bullet points under each criterion Comments provide full justification for the score given

IER Factual Evidence Comments are substantial; do not write generic criticisms; be specific, explain Comments are facts not opinions, don t show doubt or indecision not I don t understand why... but The proposers do not make clear why... Poor comments include words like: Perhaps, think, seems, assume, probably, Good comments include words like: Because, percent, specifically, for example,

IER Give Clear Messages Poor comments are vague - Good ones are precise : I think the consortium management plan is probably inadequate. The consortium management plan is inadequate. It does not include clear overall responsibility for the demonstration activities; it omits a problem-solving mechanism in the event of disputes between partners. The resources for the project seem unrealistic. The resources in Workpackages 4 and 6 are seriously underestimated given the complexity of the activity involved.

IER Avoiding Conflicts Poor comments provide an opening for a debate - Good comments close the question: There is no discussion of dissemination activities. Dissemination activities are not adequately discussed. There is only one end-user organisation in the consortium. The consortium lacks a sufficient participation of end-users. The proposal coordinator is not adequately experienced. The proposal coordinator does not demonstrate in this proposal an adequate level of experience of work in this field.

IER Final Check Have you fully explained the proposal s strengths and weaknesses on all criteria? Do your scores match your comments (high scores = positive comments, low scores = negative comments)? Have you double-checked any matters-of-fact which you have quoted? Have you written at adequate length? If this was my proposal, would I find this report fair, accurate clear and complete?

Submitting your IERs First, read over all your proposals to get an idea of the general standard and content When you have completed the evaluation of each proposal, submit your IER (IAR) in the Rivet tool - Don t wait until you have evaluated all your proposals before starting to submit You will see that the Rivet tool has the facility to create Consensus Reports CRs and Evaluation Summary Reports ESRs. We will not use this in this evaluation; you stop at the creation of IERs (IARs)

Finally, Give a fair and clear opinion on each proposal. You are: Independent : you represent yourself, not your employer, not your country..) Objective : you evaluate the proposal as written Accurate : you use the official evaluation criteria only Consistent : you apply the same standard of judgment to each proposal Incommunicado : you do not disclose to anybody the contents of the proposals which you see

Dziękuję za uwagę koprowski.adam@gmail.com Tel. 694 413 749