SUMP: Good practice example City of Gdynia

Transkrypt

1 SUMP: Good practice example City of Gdynia 'Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans' Vilnius, 9th of June 2015 r. Mgr inż. Aleksandra Romanowska, Road and Green Areas Management Authority in Gdynia Dr Marcin Wolek, Chair on Transportation Market, University of Gdansk

2 Project CIVITAS ( ) Co-financed within 7FP; RTD project on transport planning, environmentally friendly vehicles and ITS; Partners: Gdynia (Poland), Aachen (DE), Koprivnica (CR), Palma de Mallorca (SP) Goals: Development of transport systems and services; Introduction of ecological means of transport; Introduction of innovative solutions into transport systems and services; Citizens engagement into mobility planning proces; Cooperation and exchange between cities/partners. 'Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans 9th of June 2015, Romanowska & Wolek 2

3 SUMP for city of Gdynia Involvement of stakeholders and citizens a new approach in Poland; Preparation of SUTP for gdynia in the framework of EU financed project BUSTRIP (2009). It was not passed by Gdynia City Council; SUTP of BUSTRIP (2009) + Transport Plan (2014) + BYPAD (2014) + others would be integrated - supplemented, - developed, - Up-to-dated, - adjusted, - and approved New SUMP for

4 Where we are? (w trakcie konsultacji w grupie roboczej i z interesariuszami) (w opracowaniu) 4 'Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans 9th of June 2015, Romanowska & Wolek

5 Approach to Gdynia s SUMP Self assessment; Identification of stakeholders and setting up of working group; Long term strategy ; Short term action plan; Constant monitoring and evaluation. dynamic advanced Using of web Mobility 2.0 platform Using of ITS tools: 3 level transport model for SUMP analysis. Collecting and integratring of existing strategies and plans; Review and integration of other relevant documents focused on transport and mobility issues in Gdynia. integrated interactive Social involvement;public consultations; Meetings with stakeholders; Complex marketing research; Social research projects; web 2.0 multidirectional communication; living laboratory for BSR 5 'Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans 9th of June 2015, Romanowska & Wolek

6 Complex marketing research: primary data Primary research Executed by Regularity Preferences and transport behaviour of citizens (every 2-3 years, random sample of 1% of population aged 16-70); ZKM Gdynia & UG Y Preferences and transport behaviour of pupils in secondary schools (first time within CIVITAS DYN@MO, 2014) UG & ZKM N Research on potential traffic improvements on main streets in central part of Gdynia (three separate research, electronic questionnaire, between responses for each street) ZDiZ Gdynia N Research on traffic volume and its structure on main streets in central part of Gdynia (2014, 2015, tbc ) UG Y Constant research on quality (i.e. punctuality, regularity), demand and profitability of particular lines, ticket sales ZKM Y 6

7 Pedestrian research in CIVITAS Crucial for complex plan of sustainable mobility; Lack of common methodology; Research on traffic volume and its structure on main streets in central part of Gdynia; Initial results confirmed typical share of pedestrians in comparison to selected European cities. Pedestrian share in modal Population [thous.] Density [inhab./ sq. km] Year of measure Survey method split Bonn (Germany) 28% 327, RHS Graz (Austria) 19% RHS Aachen (Germany) 23% 258, HC Plymouth (UK) 18% PSPS Magdeburg (Germ.) 21% 234, RHS Saarbrucken (Germ.) 23% 177, RHS Szeged (Hungary) 22% 161, HS 7

8 Key element of the proces Setting up of common vision of city and mobility; Scenarios of development; Identification of weaknesses and disadvantages; Priorities; Setting up strategic goals; Setting up operational goals; Selection of actions. 8

9 Common vision of mobility Quality of life Better living, working and travelling conditions in Gdynia Economy Economic growth and reducing demand for transport Environment Sustainable transport for clean environment Energy Energetically efficient public transport Common development towards sustainable mobility system, ensuring high quality of life and alternative to travel in safe, clean and friendly environment Sustainable,m social, spatial and economic development of Gdynia 9

10 Self-assessment using ADVANCE questionnaire Methodology of evaluation of quality of mobility planning developed within ADVANCE project; 12 stakeholder representing city administration, urban planners, transport and harbor authorities, operators, Police. z Assessment of particular aspects in Mission area and Activity area Mission area different scores, an average result 2,4/4. średni wynik: 2,4/4 Strenghts: vision, regional/national framework, political suport. weaknesses: internal cooperation, evaluation. Activity area average score 1,7/4 strenghts: quality of public transport (3,1!) weaknesses: parking management, freight, reduction of car traffic, 10

11 Priorities Questionnaire on Around 80 stakeholders asked; 66 questions in 8 thematic groups Marks from C to A++ (resp. 1 5) Integracja biletowa transportu zbiorowego Parking miejski Uwzględnianie ruchu pieszego podczas planowania inwestycji Przestrzenie publiczne Gęstość zabudowań i przystanki transportu publicznego Parkingi typu Park & Ride Ograniczenie wjazdu do miasta pojazdom ciężarowym Bezpieczeństwo rowerzystów na skrzyżowaniach Informacja pasażerska System bezpieczeństwa ruchu drogowego Bezpieczna droga do szkoły "Zielone" pojazdy w transporcie zbiorowym Parkingi typu Bike & Ride Strefa darmowego przejazdu transportem zbiorowym Bezpieczeństwo transportu zbiorowego Promocja zrównoważonej mobilności wśród studentów Re-alokacja przestrzeni dla ruchu rowerowego Strefy uspokojonego ruchu na osiedlach mieszkaniowych Promocja zrównoważonej mobilności wśród mieszkańców System roweru miejskiego Racjonalizacja podróży służbowych Kontrola prędkości i egzekwowanie przepisów w ruchu drogowym Połączenia ponadregionalne w sieci rowerowej Punkty ładowania pojazdów elektrycznych System monitoringu przestrzeni parkingowej Integracja transportu rowerowego z transportem zbiorowym Standardy dla transportu towarów i dostaw Strefy ograniczonej emisji zanieczyszczeń Pojazdy elektryczne dla firm Rowery na buspasach Rozwój koncepcji miejskiego carpoolingu Uprzywilejowanie pojazdów ekologicznych Centrum mobilności lub oficer ds. mobilności 2,45 2,45 2,41 2,38 2,34 2,31 2,31 2,28 2,21 2,17 4,45 4,24 4,21 4,14 4,14 4,10 4,03 4,00 3,97 3,90 3,79 3,79 3,79 3,76 3,69 3,69 3,69 3,69 3,69 3,62 3,62 3,62 3,59 3,52 3,48 3,45 3,43 3,38 3,38 3,34 3,31 3,28 3,28 3,24 3,21 3,17 3,14 3,14 3,14 3,14 3,07 3,07 3,07 3,03 2,97 2,97 2,96 2,93 2,90 2,89 2,83 2,83 2,83 2,76 2,76 2,72 11

12 Strategic and operational goals Attractive and safe urban space Safe and efficient transport system Rational transport choices Effective freight transport Improvement of conditions for pedestrians Improvement of accessibility for people with reduced mobility Improvement of conditions for cyclists Improvement of quality of public space Integrated planning of transport and mobility system at metropolitan level Development of traffic management system with ITS Development of competitive public transport Increase of share of low emission vehicles Education and raising Optimistaion of transport needs Making mobility in districts more sustainable Development new mobility services Improvement of accessibility of sea harbour Creation of effective and sustainable system of urban ldistribution Supporting new tecnologies and organizational solutions for freight transport 12

13 Conulations on vision and goals Working version prepared within working group Remarks included new proposal Consultations with citizens (direct or via web 2.0) Discussions with stakeholders Discussion with stakeholders and their acceptance Final version for SUMP 13

14 Stakeholders and citizens included into planning process Meetings with groups of stakeholders and citizens Research on transport preferences and behaviour as a form of social consultations (inhouse interview with almost 2000 respondents); Consultations, workshops Self-assessment, priority questionnaire,, Mobility 2.0 platform platforma Mobility 2.0 ( and facebook consultations visualisation 14

15 Next steps Consultations and acceptance of activities for SUMP document ; Selection of indicators for monitoring and evaluation; Preparation of short-term action plan for SUMP; Consultations and acceptance of the action plan; Working version of SUMP; Consultations with stakeholders and citizens; Passing SUMP; 15

16 Competence Center on SUMP for BSR Gdynia as living laboratory for Poland and BSR Led by University of Gdansk; Supported by Environment Commission of UBC, TransCom of UBC and Lund University; Goal: to assist cities in preparation of SUMPs bringing tchem information, suport, exchange of information, training during and after CIVITAS project

17 Summary SUMP as a complex process; A need to vast data audit among all stakeholders in the city (police, transport, spatial planning, education, health ); Possibility to integration and development of existing strategies and plans; Need to be adjusted to very local conditions (i.e. strong position of district councils in Gdynia, growing importasnce of participatory budget ); National/regional framework of highest importance. 17

18 Thank you Aleksandra Romanowska Marcin Wolek