Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach str. 1 Wydział

Transkrypt

1 Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach str. 1 Kierunek i poziom studiów: Chemia, drugi Sylabus modułu: Moduł przedmiotów specjalizacyjnych A (0310-CH-S2-005) Nazwa wariantu modułu (opcjonalnie): Physical chemistry of liquids and solutions 0310-CH-S Informacje ogólne koordynator modułu rok akademicki 2013/2014 semestr forma studiów sposób ustalania oceny końcowej modułu dr hab. Marzena Dzida 2 (summer) stationary a mean value from lecture and classes 2. Opis dydaktycznych i pracy Lecure: Physical chemistry of liquids and solutions prowadzący treści metody prowadzenia dydaktycznych (kontaktowych) 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_1 The characteristics of liquids state: the compressibility, viscosity, surface tension, optical properties of the liquid. The methods for determining of physicochemical properties of liquids. Molecular interactions: the multipole approximation, the examples of functions describing energy of intermolecular interactions. Solutions: mixtures as a natural state of the presence of substances. Examples of the classification of multi-component systems. Thermodynamic excess functions and partial molar volumes. Water and aqueous solutions. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic phenomena. Non-aqueous solutions. Solutions of nonelectrolytes and electrolytes. Ionic liquids and their characteristics. The relationship between the structure of ionic liquids and their physicochemical properties. Methods of investigations of physicochemical properties of ionic liquids. The application of ionic liquids in the synthesis and extraction. The prediction of the physicochemical properties of the liquid: the use of theory and correlation of experimental data. As in the description of the module. 15

2 Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach str. 2 pracy własnej opis pracy własnej organizacja obowiązkowa uzupełniająca adres strony www 10 Working with the textbook and lecture notes, searching for information on the Internet. 1 hour (45 minutes) a week 1. P. W. Atkins, Chemia fizyczna, PWN, Warszawa Chosen papers on the issues discussed. Classes: Physical chemistry of liquids and solutions prowadzący treści metody prowadzenia dydaktycznych (kontaktowych) pracy własnej opis pracy własnej organizacja obowiązkowa uzupełniająca adres strony www 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_2 Methods for determining of fundamental physicochemical properties of liquids, density, viscosity, surface tension, interfacial tension, refractive index, and others. Intermolecular interactions: analysis of functions describing the energy of intermolecular interactions. The relationship between the structure of ionic liquids and their physicochemical properties. The prediction of the physicochemical properties of the liquid: the application of theory and correlation of experimental data. Discussing problems and solving tasks of the issues raised during classes As in the description of the module. 1 hour (45 minutes) a week. 1. P. W. Atkins, Chemia fizyczna, PWN, Warszawa Chosen papers on the issues discussed.

3 Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach str. 3 Consultations prowadzący treści metody prowadzenia dydaktycznych (kontaktowych) pracy własnej opis pracy własnej organizacja obowiązkowa uzupełniająca adres strony www 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_3 Direct consultation to assist in resolving the current difficulties arising from the implementation of the program in the module. As in the description of the module Individual consultations. As for Lecture As for Lecture 3. Opis sposobów efektów kształcenia modułu Exam (-y) wymagania kryteria oceny 0310-CH-S2-179_1, 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_ CH-S2-179_w_1 For exam the content included in the description of classes and student work are required, as well as lectures and the literature recommended by lecturer. Very good - a student independently solves the issues identified in the field of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics

4 Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach str. 4 and mathematics, he does not make mistakes; Rating good plus - student alone solves the issues identified in the field of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics, commits few errors resulted not from a shortage of knowledge; Rating good - the student uses knowledge to solve common issues and resolves the issues identified by the examiner in the field of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics committing few mistakes; Plus sufficient rating - student uses knowledge to solve problems typical of the range of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics with committing mistakes; Rating sufficient - the student understands and can explain the basic concepts and laws, with the help of the examiner, he uses knowledge to solve common problems in the field of their choice of specialization; Unsatisfactory - the student does not understand and cannot explain the basic concepts and laws. Oral examination. The student draws a set of three questions. There is one problematic question, one question verifying the ability to use knowledge to solve common problems and one question about the basic concepts and laws. The preparation time is 15 minutes. At this time, part of the answer can be included on the sheet. Oral response lasts 15 to 20 minutes. It involves answering questions and discussion with the examiner. Written test (-y) wymagania kryteria oceny 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_1, 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_ CH-S2-179_w_2 For exam the content included in the description of classes and student work are required, as well as lectures and the recommended literature. Very good - a student independently solves the issues identified in the field of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics, does not make mistakes; Rating good plus - student alone solves the issues identified in the field of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics, commits few errors resulted not from a shortage of knowledge; Rating good - the student uses knowledge to solve common issues and resolves the issues identified by the examiner in the field of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics committing few mistakes; Plus sufficient rating - student uses knowledge to solve problems typical of the range of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics with committing mistakes; Rating sufficient - the student understands and can explain the basic concepts and laws, with the help of the examiner uses knowledge to solve common problems in the field of their choice of specialization; Unsatisfactory - the student does not understand and cannot explain the basic concepts

5 Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach str. 5 and laws. The above description corresponds to the percentage scale as follows: below 55% - unsatisfactory 55-69% - sufficient 70-75% - + sufficient 76-88% - good 89-94% - + good 95 very good The student receives a set of 3 questions and problems to solve. Set includes tasks of different difficulty, testing the skills of solving complex issues, issues of common, fundamental laws and concepts, and to present their content. Written answer lasts 90 minutes and involves answering questions and solving all tasks contained in a set. Multimedia presentations 0310-CH-S2-179_w_3 (-y) 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_1, 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_2 wymagania Presentation concerning developments the literature results indicated by the teacher. kryteria oceny The student prepares a presentation guided by the criterion of knowledge (realization of the topic), and forms of communication (image composition, language and style, the use of time). Very good - extensive knowledge of the subject, to understand all the issues associated with it, proper material selection, detailed interpretation of its own conclusions, the proper use of auxiliary material, the appropriate terminology and concepts, planning and organizing speech (logical structure, discourse), the proportions between an introduction, middle and ending, perfect planning and use of time, factually correct answers, participation in the conversation, multimedia presentation prepared to perfection in terms of form, using a variety of media (graphs, drawings, texts, comments, animations,...); Rating good plus knowledge of the subject, to understand all the issues associated with it, proper selection of material and its interpretation of its own conclusions, the proper use of auxiliary material, appropriate terminology and concepts, planning and organizing speech, the proportions between an introduction, middle and the end, the perfect plan and use of time, factually correct answers, multimedia presentation prepared to perfection in terms of form, using a variety of media (graphs, drawings, texts, comments, animations,...); Rating good - full understanding of the topic and its implementation, leading to a deeper reasoning, the principles of proper speech, proper terminology, proper use of time, to formulate factually correct answers, multimedia presentation prepared properly in terms of form, using a variety of media (graphs, drawings, texts, comments, animations,...); Sufficient plus - understanding the topic and its implementation is incomplete, recall the basic contexts (from literature), partially successful argument, the speech is generally ordered and consistent, endeavor to close the whole with some final remarks, obeying the time schedule, giving generally factually correct answers, multimedia presentation

6 Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach str. 6 prepared properly in terms of form, using some means of expression (graphs, drawings, texts, comments, animations,...); Rating sufficient discussion on the topic in too general with continuous and numerous errors in speaking, but retained the language of communication, poor vocabulary and terminology, incomplete understanding of the questions, spiking and answers partially out of topic, a multimedia presentation prepared properly in terms of form; Unsatisfactory - The student does not pursue the subject at any level. The student prepares work within their own multimedia presentation and speech for 10 minutes. During the course of seminar he presents a multimedia presentation, and its discussion in detail. The student prepares a presentation during the classes. Oral answer (-y) wymagania kryteria oceny 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_1, 0310-CH-S2-179_fs_ CH-S2-179_w_4 Knowledge of concepts and values according the description of classes, provided by the lecture and the literature. Very good - a student independently solves the issues identified in the field of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics, he does not make mistakes; Rating good plus - student solves the issues identified in the field of their choice of specialization on his own, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics, he commits few errors not resulted from a shortage of knowledge; Rating good - the student uses knowledge to solve common issues and resolves the issues identified by the examiner of his choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics committing few mistakes; Plus sufficient rating - student uses knowledge to solve problems typical of the range of their choice of specialization, requiring the use of knowledge in other fields of chemistry and physics and mathematics while committing mistakes; Rating Sufficient - the student understands and can explain the basic concepts and the laws, with the help of the examiner uses knowledge and solves common problems in the field of his choice of specialization; Unsatisfactory - the student does not understand and cannot explain the basic concepts and laws. The student draws a set of three questions. One is a problematic question, one verifies the ability to use knowledge to solve common problems and one is about the basic concepts and laws. The preparation takes 15 minutes. At this time, a part of the answer can be put on the sheet. Oral response lasts 15 to 20 minutes. It involves answering questions drawn and discussion with the examiner.