Appendix I. Analysis of forest communities

Transkrypt

1 92 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 92 Appendix I. Analysis of forest communities 1. Riparian oak-ash-alder forest of the Odra Valley Ass. Ficario-Ulmetum, incl. Fraxino-Ulmetum (series 1) Anio³-Kwiatkowska 1995, Grodziska Ryczyñskie reserve, tab. 1, Ficario- Ulmetum; Kuczyñska et al. 1995, Kotowice, tab. 1, Fraxino-Ulmetum; Kuczyñska 1965, O³awa, tab. 8, Fraxino-Ulmetum; Kuczyñska 1965, O³awa, tab. 1, Fraxino-Ulmetum; Pender, Anio³-Kwiatkowska 1995, Olszyny Niezgodzkie reserve, tab. 2, Ficario-Ulmetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Weretelnik 1995a, Kanigóra reserve, tab. 1, Ficario-Ulmetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Weretelnik 1995b, Zwierzyniec reserve, tab. 4, Ficario-Ulmetum; Anio³- Kwiatkowska, Dajdok 1993, Równina Oleœnicka, tab. 26, Ficario-Ulmetum; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 3, Ficario-Ulmetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 7, Ficario-Ulmetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska et al. 1993, terasa Odry, tab. 2, Ficario-Ulmetum; Macicka- Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Wrzosy reserve, tab. 25, Ficario-Ulmetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 3, Ficario-Ulmetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Matteucia, tab. 3, Ficario-Ulmetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 5, Ficario-Ulmetum. 2. Data excluded: Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 5, Ficario-Ulmetum; S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected), but for log-normal is: W= , p< S=( )+(49.67)*log 10 (A); r= ; r 2 =0.9212; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.9429; r 2 =0.8890; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.2686

2 93 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 93 Fig. 1_1. Ficario-Ulmetum campestris of the Odra Valley, species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. 2. Riparian oak-ash-alder forest of sumbmountain rivers valley Ass. Ficario-Ulmetum, incl. Fraxino-Ulmetum (series 2) Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 2, rel. 1 17, Ficario-Ulmetum; Kwiatkowski 1996, Bazaltowa Góra, tab. 7, Ficario-Ulmetum; Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 4, Fraxino-Ulmetum; Kuczyñska 1973, Opolszczyzna, tab. 5, Ficario-Ulmetum; Kwiatkowski 1995, W¹wóz Lipa, tab. 6, Ficario- Ulmetum; Kuczyñska, Berdowski 1984, Bystrzyca valley, tab. 4, Ficario- Ulmetum; 2. Data excluded: none S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p<0.2140

3 94 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 94 Fig. 2_1. Ficario-Ulmetum campestris of submontane river valleys, species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.7806; r 2 =0.6094; p<0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.7649; r 2 =0.5851; p>0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Mountains and submountains alluvial forest of small river valleys Ass.Carici remotae-fraxinetum & Stellario-Alnetum Data desription Wilczyñska 1984, Niemcza, tab. 5, Alno-Padion all.; Macicka 1988, Góry Kamienne i Zawory, tab. 6, Alno-Padion all.; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 6, Alno-Padion all.; Œwierkosz 1994, Chojnik p. I, tab. 2, Alnetum incanae; Œwierkosz 2000, Pogórze Izerskie, tab. 1, Stellario-Alnetum; Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 2, Carici remotae-fraxinetum; Kuczyñska 1973, Opolszczyzna, tab. 2, Carici remotae-fraxinetum; Kuczyñska, Berdowski 1976, tab. 6, Carici remotae-fraxinetum; Macicka 1988, Góry

4 95 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 95 Fig. 3_1. Mountane and submountane alluvial forest of small river valleys, species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. Kamienne i Zawory, tab. 4, Carici remotae-fraxinetum; Kuczyñska, Macicka 1984, Góry Kamienne, tab. 6, Carici remotae-fraxinetum; Macicka 1988, Góry Kamienne i Zawory, tab. 3, Salicion albae all.; Œwierkosz 1997, unpb., PN Gór Sto³owych, Carici remotae-fraxinetum; Fabiszewski 1968, Góry Bialskie, tab. 5, Carici remotae-fraxinetum; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 3, Carici remotae-fraxinetum. 2. Data excluded: none. S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) S A S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.9211; r 2 =0.8484; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8664; r 2 =0.7507; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.6594

5 96 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz Lowland alluvial forest of small rivers valleys Ass. Fraxino-Alnetum = Circaeo-Alnetum (incl. Poo trivialis-alnetum and Alno-Padion communities) Pender, Ryba³towska 1995, Skarszyn reserve, tab. 1, Alno-Padion all.; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Weretelnik 1995b, Zwierzyniec reserve, tab. 3, Alno- Padion all.; Kuczyñska, Berdowski 1984, Bystrzyca valley, tab. 2, Circaeo- Alnetum; Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 3, Fraxino-Alnetum; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 4, Fraxino-Alnetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1995, Odrzyska reserve, tab. 9, Circaeo-Alnetum; Kuczyñska, Macicka 1984, Góry Kamienne, tab. 5, Circaeo-Alnetum; Œwierkosz 2004, Obiszów, Circaeo- Alnetum; Berdowski, Kwiatkowski 1996, W¹wóz Siedmicy, tab. 6, Circaeo- Alnetum; Pender, Anio³-Kwiatkowska 1995, Olszyny Niezgodzkie reserve, tab. 3, Circaeo-Alnetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Dajdok 1993, Równina Oleœnicka, tab. 27, Circaeo-Alnetum; Berdowski, Radziuk 1998, Masyw Grochowej, tab. 7, Circaeo-Alnetum; Berdowski, Kwiatkowski, 1993, Obiszów & Dalków, tab. 8, Circaeo-Alnetum; Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 1, Circaeo- Alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Matteucia, tab. 2, Circaeo-Alnetum; Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 2, Circaeo-Alnetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Wrzosy reserve, tab. 24, Poo trivialis-alnetum; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 4, Circaeo-Alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 2, Circaeo-Alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 3, Circaeo-Alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 4, Circaeo-Alnetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Wrzosy reserve, tab. 23, Circaeo-Alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 5, Circaeo-Alnetum typicum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 6, Circaeo-Alnetum var. z Adoxa moschatellina. 2. Data excluded: none. S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected).

6 97 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 97 Fig. 4_1. Lowland alluvial forest of small river valleys, species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8958; r 2 =0.8025; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8602; r 2 = ; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Oak-hornbeam forests (Odra valley series) Ass. Galio sylvatici-carpinetum (ser. 1 Odra valley forests) Data desription Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Weretelnik 1995a, Kanigóra reserve, tab. 2, Galio- Carpinetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1995, Odrzyska reserve tab. 10, Galio-Carpinetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska et al. 1993, terasa Odry, tab. 3, Galio- Carpinetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Weretelnik 1995b, Zwierzyniec reserve, tab. 5, Galio-Carpinetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska 1995, Grodziska Ryczyñskie reserve, tab. 2 & 3, Galio-Carpinetum corydaletosum; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 6, Galio-Carpinetum corydaletosum; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 7, Galio-Carpinetum stachyetosum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 8,

7 98 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 98 Fig. 5_1. Galio sylvatici-carpinetum betuli of the Odra Valley, species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. Galio-Carpinetum stachyetosum; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 8, Galio-Carpinetum typicum; Kuczyñska et al. 1995, Kotowice, tab. 8, Querco-Carpinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 10, Galio-Carpinetum typicum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 9, Galio-Carpinetum var. z Ulmus minor. 2. Data excluded: Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 9, Galio-Carpinetum holcetosum (different ecological form) S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) but log-normal distribution is W= , p< S A S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.9727; r 2 =0.9463; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.9599; r 2 =0.9215; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space W= , p<0.9560

8 99 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities Oak-hornbeam forests (north Silesian series) Ass. Galio sylvatici-carpinetum (ser. 2 north Silesian forests) Data desrciption Pender, Ryba³towska 1995, Skarszyn reserve, tab. 2, Galio-Carpinetum; Berdowski, Kwiatkowski, 1993, Obiszów & Dalków, tab. 9, Galio-Carpinetum; Œwierkosz 2004, Obiszów, Galio-Carpinetum; Pender, Anio³-Kwiatkowska, 1995, Olszyny Niezgodzkie reserve, tab. 4, Galio-Carpinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 4, Galio-Carpinetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1995, Wzgórze Joanny, tab. 2, Galio-Carpinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Matteucia, tab. 4, Galio-Carpinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 6, Galio-Carpinetum corydaletosum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 6, Galio-Carpinetum corydaletosum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 9, Galio-Carpinetum holcetosum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 9, Galio-Carpinetum holcetosum; Œwierkosz 2004, Obiszów, Galio-Carpinetum stachyetosum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 7, Galio-Carpinetum stachyetosum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 7, Galio-Carpinetum stachyetosum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 8, Galio-Carpinetum typicum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 8, Galio-Carpinetum typicum. 2. Data excluded: Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 10, Galio-Carpinetum (various ecological forms in the one table) S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p<0.037 (hypothesis rejected) but lognormal distribution is W= , p< S A S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r= r 2 =0.8195; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r= r 2 = ; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space W= , p<0.0993

9 100 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 100 Fig. 6_1. Galio sylvatici-carpinetum betuli (north Silesian series), species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. 7. Oak-hornbeam submontane forests Ass. Galio sylvatici-carpinetum (ser. 3 submontane forests) Œwierkosz 1994, Chojnik p. I, tab. 3, Carpinion all.; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 7, Galio-Carpinetum; Kwiatkowski 1995, Góra Rataj, tab. 3, Galio-Carpinetum; Œwierkosz 2000, Pogórze Izerskie, tab. 2, Galio-Carpinetum; Berdowski, Radziuk 1998, Masyw Grochowej, tab. 8, Galio-Carpinetum; Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 5, Galio-Carpinetum; Kuczyñska 1973, Opolszczyzna, tab. 7, Querco-Carpinetum stachyetosum; Kuczyñska 1973, Opolszczyzna, tab. 6, Querco-Carpinetum; Szczêœniak, K¹cki 2000, tab. 8, rel. 1 5, Galio-Carpinetum; Œwierkosz 1998, unpb., Cisowa Góra reserve, Galio- Carpinetum luzuletosum; Kwiatkowski 1996, Bazaltowa Góra, tab. 8, Galio- Carpinetum; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 5, Querco-Carpinetum. 2. Data excluded: none. S A

10 101 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 101 Fig. 7_1. Galio sylvatici-carpinetum betuli (submontane forest), species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected), but log-normal distribution W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected), but log-normal distribution W= , p< S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.9198; r 2 =0.8460; p< Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space W= , p< log S=(2.2205)+( )*(log A); r=0.9085; r 2 =0.8254; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space W= , p< Subcontinental oak-hornbeam forest in east part of Sudety piedmont Ass. Tilio-Carpinetum Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 3, Tilio-Carpinetum ficarietosum (=corydaletosum); Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 5, Tilio- Carpinetum luzuletosum; Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 4, Tilio- Carpinetum typicum; Wilczyñska 1984, Niemcza, tab. 4, Tilio-Carpinetum

11 102 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 102 typicum; Wilczyñska 1984, Niemcza, tab. 3, Tilio-Carpinetum stachyetosum and corydaletosum. 2. Data excluded: none S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8234; r 2 =0.6779; p>0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8157; r 2 =0.6653; p>0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Remark: results not significant, so further analysis have not been performed. 9. Ravine forest of Sudetes piedmont SAll. Tilienio-Acerenion ser. 1 (Aceri-Tilietum, Phyllitido-Aceretum, cfr. Mercuriali-Fraxinetum) N Mean Min Max St. Dev. S A Œwierkosz 1997, unpb., PN Gór Sto³owych, Acerion all.; Kwiatkowski 1996, Bazaltowa Góra, tab. 9, Aceri-Tilietum; Kwiatkowski 1995, Góra Rataj, tab. 4, Aceri-Tilietum; Kwiatkowski 1995, W¹wóz Lipa reserve, tab. 5, Aceri- Tilietum; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 8, Aceri-Tilietum; Kwiatkowski 1993, Wleñ, tab. 1, Aceri-Tilietum; Berdowski 1993, Nowe Rochowice, tab. 4, Mercuriali-Fraxinetum; Fabiszewski et al. 1997, Myœlibórz, tab. 1, Phyllitido-Aceretum; Œwierkosz 1998, unpb., Cisowa Góra, Aceri-Tilietum; Kwiatkowski 1996b, Wzgórza Soko³owskie, tab. 9, Aceri-Tilietum; Anio³- Kwiatkowska, Œwierkosz 1993, Ostrzyca tab. 15, Aceri-Tilietum corydaletosum. 2. Data excluded: none. S A

12 103 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 103 Fig. 8_1. Ravine forest of Sudetes Piedmont (SAll. Tilienio-Acerenion) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8524; r 2 =0.7266; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r= ; r 2 = ; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Ravine forest of Sudetes Sall. Acerenion (Lunario-Aceretum & Sorbo-Aceretum group) Berdowski, Panek 2001, Wodospad Wilczki, tab. 1, Lunario-Aceretum; Kuczyñska, Macicka 1984, Góry Kamienne, tab. 8, Lunario-Aceretum; Kwiatkowski 1997, Góry O³owiane, tab. 2, Lunario-Aceretum; Œwierkosz 1994, Chojnik p. I, tab. 5, rel. 7 9, Lunario-Aceretum; Œwierkosz 2003a, Zieleniec, tab. 1, Aceri-Fagetum; Œwierkosz 1997, unpb., PN Gór Sto³owych, Acerion all.; Fabiszewski 1968, Góry Bialskie, tab. 6, Arunco-Aceretum.

13 104 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 104 Fig. 9_1. Ravine forest of the Sudetes (SAll. Acerenion pseudoplatani) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. 2. Data excluded: Pender, Macicka-Pawlik 1996b, Rogowa Kopa, tab. 5, Lunario-Aceretum; Pender, Macicka-Pawlik 1996, Poœna, tab. 2, Lunario- Aceretum; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 6, Lunario-Aceretum; (rich in species, calcyphilous forms of associations) S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.9834; r 2 = ; p <0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r= ; r 2 =0.9430; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.8539

14 105 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities Mountain and submountain rich beech forest Ass. Dentario enneaphylli-fagetum (incl. Taxo-Fagetum) Œwierkosz 1994, Chojnik p. I, tab. 5, rel. 1-6, Dentario-Fagetum; Kwiatkowski 1995, Góra Œlê a, rel. 7 12, Dentario-Fagetum; Berdowski 1993, Nowe Rochowice, tab. 2, Dentario-Fagetum; Kwiatkowski 1996, Bazaltowa Góra, tab. 10, Dentario-Fagetum; Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 6, Dentario-Fagetum; Pender, Macicka-Pawlik 1996, Poœna, tab. 1, Dentario- Fagetum; Œwierkosz 1997, unpbl., PN Gór Sto³owych, Dentario-Fagetum; Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 6, Dentario-Fagetum; Kuczyñska 1973, Opolszczyzna, tab. 11, Dentario-Fagetum; Kuczyñska, Macicka 1984, Góry Kamienne, tab. 9, Dentario-Fagetum; Macicka 1988, Góry Kamienne i Zawory, tab. 7, Dentario-Fagetum; Berdowski 1991, Mi³ek reserve, tab. 5, Dentario- Fagetum; Berdowski 1991, Mi³ek reserve, tab. 6, Taxo-Fagetum; Fabiszewski 1970, Jaskinia Nied wiedzia, tab. 1, Dentario-Fagetum; Fabiszewski 1968, Góry Bialskie, tab. 3, Dentario-Fagetum; Wilczyñska 1985, Rez. Cisowe, tab. 1, Dentario-Fagetum; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 7, Dentario-Fagetum odm. górska; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 9, Dentario-Fagetum odm. podgórska;. 2. Data excluded: Pender, Macicka-Pawlik, 1996b, Rogowa Kopa, tab. 4, Dentario-Fagetum (too big area jumping point). S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) S A S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r= ; r 2 = ; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.9159; r 2 = ; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.5682

15 106 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 106 Fig. 10_1. Mountane and submontane rich beech forest (ass. Dentario enneaphylli-fagetum) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. 12. Uppland and lowland rich beech forest Ass. Asperulo-Fagetum (=Melico-Fagetum) Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Berdowski, Wójcik 1993, Œlê a, tab. 10, Melico- Fagetum; Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 14, Melico-Fagetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 10, Melico-Fagetum; Macicka- Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1995, Wzgórze Joanny, tab. 3, Melico-Fagetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 11, Melico-Fagetum; Soko³owski 1965, Bukowa Góra, tab. 1, Melico-Fagetum; Krawiecowa, Kuczyñska 1968, Leœna Woda, tab. 7, Melico-Fagetum; Berdowski 1974, Œlê a, tab. 17, Melico-Fagetum. 2. Data excluded: Berdowski, Kwiatkowski 1993, Obiszów & Dalków, tab. 11, Melico-Fagetum. S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p<0.3160, but lognormal distribution is W= , p<

16 107 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 107 Fig. 11_1. Upland and lowland rich beech forest (ass. Asperulo-Fagetum) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r= ; r 2 = ; p <0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.9409; r 2 = ; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Acidophilous beech forest of Sudety Mts. Ass. Luzulo luzuloidis-fagetum (series 1 & 2). There are two different sets of data: Series 1 (poorest patches): Berdowski, Panek 2001, Wodospad Wilczki, tab. 2, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Kwiatkowski 1996b, Wzgórza Soko³owskie, tab. 10, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 9, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Kwiatkowski 1993, Wleñ, tab. 2, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 7, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Œwierkosz 2002, Krokusy w Górzyñcu, tab. 1, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Fabiszewski 1970, Jaskinia NiedŸwiedzia, tab. 2, Luzulo

17 108 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 108 nemorosae-fagetum; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 10, Luzulo nemorosae- Fagetum; Fabiszewski 1968, Góry Bialskie, tab. 2, rel. 1 9, Luzulo-Fagetum typicum; Œwierkosz 1994, Chojnik p. I, tab. 4, rel. 1 9, Luzulo nemorosae- Fagetum dryopteridetosum linnaei; Series 2 (richest patches): Fabiszewski 1968, Góry Bialskie, tab. 2, rel , Luzulo-Fagetum poetosum chaixi; Szczêœniak, K¹cki 2000, tab. 8, rel. 1 4, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Kuczyñska, Macicka 1984, Góry Kamienne, tab. 10, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Macicka 1988, Góry Kamienne i Zawory, tab. 8, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum; Kwiatkowski 1995, Góra Œlê a, tab. rel 1 6., Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum. 2. Data excluded: Œwierkosz 1994, Chojnik p. I, tab. 4, rel , Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum (atypically poor form, degraded by forestry); Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 7, Luzulo nemorosae-fagetum (atypical, east- Sudeten form of association). Series 1 S A Series 2 S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test: series 1 W= , p< series 2 W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test: series 1 W= , p< series 2 W= , p< Series 1 S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.9673; r 2 =0.9357; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r= ; r 2 = ; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.6467

18 109 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 109 Fig. 12_1. Mountane and submontane acidophilous beech forest (ass. Luzulo luzuloidis- Fagetum), series 1, species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. Series 2 ser 2 S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0,8688; r 2 =0.7549; p<0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< ser 2 log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8965; r 2 = , p<0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Fig. 13_1. Mountain and submontane acidophilous beech forest (ass. Luzulo luzuloidis- Fagetum), series 2, species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space.

19 110 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz Acidophilous beech and fir forest of Wa³ Trzebnicki Ass. Luzulo pilosae-fagetum & Abietetum polonicum Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 5, Luzulo pilosae- Fagetum; Pender, Ryba³towska 1995, Skarszyn reserve, tab. 3, Luzulo pilosae- Fagetum; Berdowski, Kwiatkowski 1993, Obiszów & Dalków, tab. 10, Luzulo pilosae-fagetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 11, Luzulo pilosae-fagetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 12, Luzulo pilosae- Fagetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1995, Jod³owice, tab. 1, Abietetum polonicum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 15, Abietetum polonicum; Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 17, Luzulo pilosae-fagetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1995, Wzgórze Joanny, tab. 4, Luzulo pilosae-fagetum. 2. Data excluded: none S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< S=(79.476)+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.9689; r 2 =0.9388; p< Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=(1.9412)+( )*(log A); r=0.8764; r 2 =0.7681; p< Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.2100

20 111 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 111 Fig. 14_1. Lowland acidophilous beech and fir forest (ass. Luzulo pilosá-fagetum and Abietetum polonicum ), species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. 15. Acidophilous oak forests All. Quercion-robori petraeae p.p. Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 18, Luzulo pilosae-quercetum; Pender 1988, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. I, tab. 8, Luzulo luzuloidis-quercetum; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 3, Molinio arundinaceae-quercetum; Wilczyñska 1985, Góry Bardzkie, tab. 2, Luzulo luzuloidis-quercetum; Berdowski, Kwiatkowski 1993, Obiszów & Dalków, tab. 7, Querco-Pinetum; Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 9, Molinio-Quercetum; Œwierkosz 1992, Niemcza, tab. 1, Luzulo luzuloidis-quercetum; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 4, Calamagrostio-Quercetum; Berdowski, Kwiatkowski 1996, Siedmica, tab. 5; Calamagrostio-Quercetum; Kwiatkowski 1995, W¹wóz Lipa, tab. 4; Calamagrostio-Quercetum; Kwiatkowski 1996, Bazaltowa, tab. 6, Calamagrostio-Quercetum; Berdowski, Radziuk 1998, Masyw Grochowej, tab. 6, Calamagrostio-Quercetum; Berdowski, Panek 1999, Radunia, tab. 2, Calamagrostio-Quercetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Dalkowskie, tab. 13, Calamagrostio-Quercetum. 2. Data excluded: Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 13, Luzulo pilosae- Quercetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 12, Quercion robori-petraeae all. (too big are jumping point).

21 112 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 112 S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) log-normal distribution W= , p< S A S=(79.914)+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.754; r 2 =0.49; p< Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=(1.9353)+( )*(log A); r=0.7378; r 2 = ; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p<0.365 Fig. 15_1. Acidophilous oak forest (all. Quercion-robori petraeae) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space.

22 113 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities Thermophilous forest of Sudety Mts. and his piedmont All. Quercion-robori petraeae p.p. & O. Quercetea pubescenti-petraeae Kwiatkowski 1995, Góra Rataj, tab. 2, Luzulo albidae-quercetum; Kwiatkowski 1996b, Wzgórza Soko³owskie, tab.8, Luzulo luzuloidis-quercetum (genistetosum); Kwiatkowski 1995, W¹wóz Lipa reserve, tab. 3, Luzulo- Quercetum genistetosum; Kwiatkowski 1996, Bazaltowa Góra, tab. 5, Luzulo- Quercetum genistetosum; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 2, Luzulo- Quercetum genistetosum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Œwierkosz, 1993, Ostrzyca, tab. 16, Aceri-Tiletum calamagrostietosum; Berdowski 1974, Œlê a, tab. 18, Potentillo albae-quercetum; Wilczyñska 1984, Niemcza, tab. 6, comm. of O. Quercetalia pubescentis; 2. Data excluded: Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 8, Luzulo albidae- Quercetum; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 1, Luzulo-Quercetum genistetosum. S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8457; r 2 =0.7152; p<0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r= ; r 2 = ; p<0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space W= , p<0.0544

23 114 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 114 Fig. 16_1. Thermophilous oak forest (all. Quercion pubescenti-petraeae and ass. Luzulo luzoulidis-quercetum genistetosum) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. 17. Shrub communities Cl. Rhamno-Prunetea Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Œwierkosz 1993, Ostrzyca, tab. 13, Berberidion all.; Szczêœniak 1998, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie III, tab. 12, rel , Berberidion all.; Szczêœniak 1998a, Krzy owa Góra, tab. 4 rel. 4 8., Ligustro-Prunetum; Kuczyñska 1973, Opolszczyzna, tab. 13, Carpino-Prunetum; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 11, Pruno-Crataegetum; Anio³- Kwiatkowska, Dajdok 1993, Równina Oleœnicka, tab. 23, Pruno-Crataegetum; Szczêœniak 1998, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie III, tab. 12, rel. 1 10, Pruno- Crataegetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Weretelnik 1995b, Zwierzyniec reserve, tab. 2, Pruno-Crataegetum; Kwiatkowski 1996b, Wzgórza Soko³owskie, tab. 7, Pruno-Crataegetum. 2. Data excluded: Pender 1990, Wzgórza Strzeliñskie p. II, tab. 29, rel. 1 10, Pruno-Crataegetum (extremely rich form). S A

24 115 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 115 Fig 17_1. Shrub communities (cl. Rhamno-Prunetea), species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space. S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) but for log-normal distribution W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) but for log-normal distribution W= , p< S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8509; r 2 =0.7240; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8687; r 2 =0.7547; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Mixed, oak-pine forests Ass. Pino-Quercetum & Peucedano-Pinetum Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 23; Peucedano-Pinetum, Wilczyñska 1984, Niemcza, tab. 7, Pino-Quercetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 6, Pino-Quercetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie,

25 116 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 116 tab. 14, Pino-Quercetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 17, Pino-Quercetum; Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 20, Pino-Quercetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Wrzosy reserve, tab. 28, Pino-Quercetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 16, Pino-Quercetum fagetosum; Szczêœniak 1997, Pogórze Wa³brzyskie, tab. 5, Pinus-Quercus rocky communities. 2. Data excluded: none. S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test: W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test: W= , p< S A S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8673; r 2 =0.7522; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8815; r 2 =0.7771; p<0.001 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Fig. 18_1. Mixed Scot Pine and oak forest (ass. Pino-Quercetum and Peucedano-Pinetum) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space.

26 117 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities Scot s Pine forests Ass. Leucobryo-Pinetum & Molinio-Pinetum Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 12, rel. 1 7, Leucobryo-Pinetum; Berdowski, Kwiatkowski 1993, Obiszów & Dalków, tab. 6, Leucobryo-Pinetum; Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 27, Leucobryo- Pinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 15, Leucobryo- Pinetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Dajdok 1993, Równina Oleœnicka, tab. 29, Leucobryo-Pinetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Wrzosy reserve, tab. 30, Leucobryo-Pinetum; Berdowski 1974, Œlê a, tab. 16, Leucobryo- Pinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 21, Leucobryo-Pinetum typicum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 8, Leucobryo-Pinetum var. Molinia; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 20, Leucobryo-Pinetum var. Molinia; Guzik et al. 1994, Pr¹dy, tab. 6, Molinio-Pinetum; Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 24, Molinio-Pinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 19, Molinio- Pinetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 7, Molinio-Pinetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Wrzosy reserve, tab. 29, Molinio- Pinetum. 2. Data excluded: Berdowski, Radziuk 1998, Masyw Grochowej, tab. 5, Leucobryo-Pinetum (probably anthropogenic Pinus culture). S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected), but W= , p< for log-normal distribution. S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8078; r 2 =0.6524; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8313; r 2 =0.6911; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.9545

27 118 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 118 Fig. 19_1. Scot s Pine (ass. Leucobryo-Pinetum and Molinio-Pinetum) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space 20. Bog coniferous woodland Potocka 1999, Wielkie Torfowisko Batorowskie, tab. 8, Pino rotundatae- Sphagnetum; Potocka 1999, Wielkie Torfowisko Batorowskie, tab. 10, Bazzanio trilobatae-piceetum; Potocka 1997, Torfowisko Izerskie, tab. 10, Sphagno magellanici-pinetum; Potocka 1999, Wielkie Torfowisko Batorowskie, tab. 9, Sphagno-Piceetum; Ko³a 1995, Torfowisko k. Grabowna, tab. 4, Vaccinio uliginosi-pinetum. 2. Data excluded: Potocka 1997, Torfowisko Izerskie, tab. 11, Sphagno- Piceetum and Guzik et al. 1994, Pr¹dy, tab. 7, Vaccinio uliginosi-pinetum (extremely rich form). 3. Basis statistics of data: S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< (hypothesis rejected) A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< and for log-normal distribution W= , p<0.9074

28 119 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 119 Fig. 20_1. Bog woodland species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.7448; r 2 =0.5548; p>0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.7474; r 2 =0.5587; p>0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Remark: detailed analysis not performed as a results are not statistically significant. 21. High-mountain Norway spruce forest (Vaccinio-Piceeion all., forest under 700 m asl.) Œwierkosz 1997, unpb., PN Gór Sto³owych, Picea-Trientalis comm.; Fabiszewski 1968, Góry Bialskie, tab. 7, Piceetum hercynicum; Œwierkosz, Puszcza Jaworowa, unpb., Plagiothecio-Piceetum; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 11, Piceetum hercynicum; Œwierkosz 1997, unpb., PN Gór Sto³owych, Calamagrostio villosae-piccetum. 2. Data excluded: none.

29 120 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 120 Fig. 21_1. High altitude Norway spruce forest (all. Vaccinio-Piceion) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space S A S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< S=(50.735)+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8317; r 2 =0.6972; p<0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.822; r 2 =0.6758; p<0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.4548

30 121 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities Alder peat bogs (Ribeso nigri-alnetum, Carici elongatae-alnetum) There are two different series of data: Series 1 (poorest patches): Krawiecowa, Kuczyñska 1964, ê czak reserve, tab. 2, Carici elongatae-alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 3, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Matteucia, tab. 1, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Anio³-Kwiatkowska, Dajdok 1993, Równina Oleœnicka, tab. 25, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1990, tab. 1, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Pender, Anio³-Kwiatkowska 1995, Olszyny Niezgodzkie reserve, tab. 1, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1993, Wzgórza arskie, tab. 1, Ribo nigri-alnetum. Series 2 (richest patches): Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 2, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 2, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Kuczyñska 1972, Góry Opawskie, tab. 1, Carici-Alnetum; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Uroczysko Wrzosy reserve, tab. 21, Ribo nigri-alnetum; Macicka 1984, Kotlina Milicka, tab. 1, Carici elongatae-alnetum. Series 1 S A Series 2 S A Series 1 S distribution W of S-W= , p<0.6302; A distribution W S-W= , p<0.3080; but log-normal distribution is W S-W= , p< Series 2 S distribution W S-W= , p<0.1071; A distribution W S-W= , p<0.2126

31 122 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 122 Fig. 22_1. Alder peat bogs (ass. Ribeso nigri-alnetum = Carici elongatae-alnetum) series 1 species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space Series 1 Gleason equation S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.938; r 2 =0.8798; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.9423; r 2 =0.8879; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Series 2 Gleason equation S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.7116; r 2 =0.5063; p>0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.7523; r 2 =0.526; p>0.05 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p< Detailed analysis for series 2 was not performed (p>0.05)

32 123 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 123 Fig. 23_1. Alluvial, willow-poplar forest (ass. Salici-Populetum s.l) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space 23. Alluvial, willow-poplar rivers forest (Salicetum albo-fragilis, Salici-Populetum) Kuczyñska, Berdowski 1984, Dolina Bystrzycy, tab. 1, Salicetum albofragilis; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie, tab. 2, Salicetum albo-fragilis; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 1, Salici-Populetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1991, Wzgórza Dalkowskie, tab. 2, Salici-Populetum; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 1, Salici-Populetum. 2. Data excluded: none S log-normal distribution W of S-W= , p< A log-normal distribution W of S-W= , p< N Mean Minimum Maksimum SD S A Gleason equation S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.96; r 2 =0.9225; p<0.01; [analysis with jumping point, prediction uncertain not continued]

33 124 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 124 log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.9747; r 2 =0.95; p<0.01 Rest distribution tested of Shapiro-Wilks test in log-log space: W= , p< Willow thickets (Ass. Salicetum pentandro-cinereae) Wilczyñska 1988, Malczyce, tab. 7, Salicetum pentandro-cinereae; Macicka, Wilczyñska 1988, Œcinawskie Obni enie Odry, tab. 4, Salicetum pentandrocinereae; Macicka 1988, Góry Kamienne i Zawory, tab. 2, Salicetum pentandrocinereae; Drozdowska, Macicka 1994, Pradolina Wroc³awska, tab. 2, Salicetum pentandro-cinereae; Macicka-Pawlik, Wilczyñska 1996b, Wrzosy reserve, tab. 22, Salicetum pentandro-cinereae; Fabiszewski 1968, G. Bialskie, tab. 1, Salicetum triandro-viminalis. 2. Data excluded:. Guzik et al. 1994, Pr¹dy, tab. 5, Salicetum pentandrocinereae (extremely poor in species peat-bog form, which should not been including in this association, probably undescribed community). : N Mean Minimum Maksimum SD S A S log-normal distribution W of S-W= , p< A log-normal distribution W of S-W= , p< Gleason equation S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8296; r 2 =0.6882; p<0.05 Rest distribution tested of Shapiro-Wilks test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8748; r 2 =0.7654; p<0.05 Rest distribution tested of Shapiro-Wilks test in log-log space: W= , p<0.3022

34 125 Species-area-relationships-of-plant-communities 125 Fig. 24_1. Willow thickets (ass. Salicetum pentandro-cinereae) species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space 25. Forest plantation and natural Betula pendula groves Wilczyñska 1988, Malczyce, Betula pendula culture; Kuczyñska et al. 1994, Victoria tab.5, Betula pendula culture; Kuczyñska et al. 1994, Victoria tab. 8, Betula pendula culture (Betula-Calamagrostis comm.); Pender, Anio³- Kwiatkowska 1995, Olszyny Niezgodzkie, tab. 5, Pinus-Larix culture; Œwierkosz 1994, Chojnik cz I, tab. 6, rel. 1 9, Picea-Fagus culture; Pender 1990, Wzg. Strzeliñskie cz. II, tab. 31, Picea-Pinus culture; Œwierkosz 2004, Obiszów, Pinus culture; Kuczyñska, Macicka 1984, Góry Kamienne, tab. 11, Picea culture; Macicka 1988, G. Kamienne i Zawory tab. 9, Picea culture; Pender 1995, Góry Sowie tab. 12, Picea culture; Potocka 1999, Wielkie Torfowisko Batorowskie, tab. 11, Picea culture; Kuczyñska et al. 1995, Kotowice, tab. 13, Pinus-Quercus culture. 2. Data excluded: none N Œrednia Minimum Maksimum Odch.Std S A

35 126 Krzysztof-Œwierkosz 126 Fig. 25_1. Forest plantation and natural Betula pendula groves species-area relationship, Gleason plot in semi-log space S normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< A normal distribution tested by Shapiro-Wilk s test W= , p< Gleason equation S=( )+( )*log 10 (A); r=0.8330; r 2 =0.6938; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in semi-log space: W= , p< log S=( )+( )*(log A); r=0.8031; r 2 =0.6450; p<0.01 Rest distribution of Shapiro-Wilk s test in log-log space: W= , p<0.5644