Leasing Draft Standard 4 December 2013

Wielkość: px

Rozpocząć pokaz od strony:

Download "Leasing Draft Standard 4 December 2013"

Grzegorz Turek
2 lat temu
Przeglądów:

Transkrypt

1 Leasing Draft Standard 4 December 2013

2 Key elements of the new standard Leasing definition Leasing a contract, under which the right to use an asset is transferred, for a specified period of time, in exchange for a remuneration Possibilities of controlling the use: Ability to make decisions, which have a significant influence on economic benefits obtained from the asset; Right to realize, in principle, all the economic benefits stemming from use of the asset, during the contract period. Definition criteria: Delivery of a specific asset + Control Managing use of the asset Realizing benefits from using the asset 2

3 Key elements of the new standard Examples of assets subject to leasing transactions Buildings - Warehouses - Office space - Rental properties Means of transport - Heavy goods vehicles - Car fleet Equipment and infrastructure - Office equipment, computers - Power outlets Land - Perpetual usufruct - Lease 3

4 Lessee accounting. 4

5 Lessee accounting One model for leasing recognition by the lessee Important changes in lessee accounting: Right of Use model Every leasing contract will be recognized in the lessee s balance sheet (current division into operational and financial leasing is removed); Balance sheet recognition as of the date of leasing commencement, i.e. day, on which the lessor makes the asset available for lessee s use 1. Current IAS 17 Two models Operational Leasing Financial Leasing 2. Draft standard One model for all contracts Right of use

6 Draft standard - leasing A single model for leasing recognition by lessee Balance sheet Asset stemming from right of use of an object Initial measurement as current (discounted) value of leasing payments Capitalization of cost of entering into a leasing contract Liability to pay leasing payments Initial measurement as current (discounted) value of leasing payments Interest rate of the leasing contract The lessee s marginal interest rate may be used Complications in estimating the asset and liability Estimating leasing period Estimating cash flows Charge for purchase of the object of leasing 6

7 Draft standard - leasing Classification of leasing contracts by the lessee Two types of leasing, depending on type of asset Type A Type B Contracts, which do not pertain to real estate (e.g. leasing of vehicles or equipment) are classified as Type A, unless: ü Leasing period is an insignificant part of useful economic life of the asset ü Current value of fixed payments is not significant compared to fair value of the asset Contract is classified as Type A also when the lessee has significant incentives to use the option to buy the asset Contracts pertaining to real estate (i.e. Land and buildings) are classified as Type B, unless : ü Leasing period covers the majority of useful economic life of the asset ü Current value of fixed payments is in principle almost equal to fair value of the asset 7

8 Draft standard - leasing Two approaches to leasing cost recognition by the lessee Type A Depreciation of right to use Depreciation of the asset is linear or in accordance with method of use The asset is analyzed for impairment Cost of interest is determined by depreciated cost Measurement of liability by depreciated cost method Cost of interest in the profit and loss statement Type B Linear recognition of cost of easing in the profit and loss statement, close to cost recognition for operational leasing contracts based on future leasing payments Depreciation of the asset calculated as difference between cost of leasing and value of interest Impairment analysis Measurement of liability by depreciated cost method Cost of interest in the profit and loss statement 8

9 Lessor accounting. 9

10 Lessor accounting Models presented in Drafts for the Standard Draft standard Current proposal Performance obligation Derecognition Type A Receivable from leasing and residual asset Type B Operational leasing 10

11 Draft standard - leasing Two approaches to recognition of leasing by lessor Operational leasing approach Keeping the leased asset on the balance sheet Linear recognition of revenues throughout the leasing period Direct costs accounted for throughout the leasing period Asset depreciation in line with a relevant standard 11

12 Lessor accounting Two approaches to recognition of leasing by lessor Receivable from leasing and residual asset Balance sheet Leased asset is removed from the balance sheet and replaced with a receivable from leasing and a residual asset Receivable is measured as current value of future payments, increased by direct costs Residual asset is measured as discounted value of expected benefits from the asset, increased by potential current value of variable payments and part of the result Profit and loss statement Possible recognition of revenue in connection with derecognition of asset (difference between value of the receivable and value of the derecognized asset) Interest revenue (both receivable and residual asset measured by depreciated cost method) Impairment test for receivables from leasing (IAS 39/IFRS 9) and residual asset (IAS 36) 12

13 What next?. 13

14 What next? Many years of ups and downs H H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H H2 Draft Standard Comments Discussions and modifications of the draft New Draft New Standard? Old Standard PwC

15 What next? Further discussions Ø Over 600 comments to new draft standard Ø Three options: - Abandon the draft? - Leave only disclosures (postpone the measurement issue indefinitely)? - Make a decision and issue the new standard? Ø Options to choose from: - Continue with the current draft standard? - Keep lessor accounting in line with IAS 17, and change only lessee accounting? - Recognize all leasing contracts in the balance sheet, but keep profit and loss statement in line with IAS 17? - Other proposals? 10

16 Key elements of the Draft Standard Summary of differences IAS 17 Draft standard (2009) Draft standard (2013) Leasing recognition model Two models: - operational - financial One model (lessee) Two models (lessor) Two models: - Type A - Type B Recognition in the balance sheet Depending on model Yes Yes Leasing period As per contract/ certain Expected As per contract/ certain Leasing rate Contractual rate of return Marginal interest rate Both Contingent payments (taking into consideration in minimum leasing payments) No Yes, all by expected value Yes, but only based on index and rate Purchase option Included in the asset only if execution certain Not included in the asset Included in the asset only if execution certain Changed estimates Nowe standardy MSSF Not all adjust the FS FS adjusted FS adjusted 27 października

17 Business implications or what needs to be remembered! Financial and performance indicators Changes in IT / accounting systems Contracts with business entities Employment, motivational programs Changes in leasing recognition Control processes and procedures Information collection process Communication with stakeholders Taxes 17

18 Business implications Polish market financial and operational leasing Ø Leasing companies market total value of outstanding portfolio as of the end of first half of 2013 is 62,3 billion PLN (53,4 billion PLN for movable property and 8,9 billion PLN for real estate). For comparison balance of investment loans granted to companies by banks : 82,0 billion PLN, as of 30/06/2013. Ø Fleet market in Poland (members of PZWLP and ZPL) in total, after Q2 of 2013, vehicles (approx. 5 billion PLN in terms of value). Ø Office space rental market in Warsaw alone, approx. 3,6 million m2 of office space rented as of the end of Q2 2013, which makes approximately 3,2 billion PLN per annum (almost as much annually in other big cities - Kraków, Wrocław, Tri-City, Poznań, Katowice, Łódź). 18

19 Thank you for your attention Niniejsza publikacja została opracowana w celach informacyjnych i zawiera jedynie ogólne wskazówki odnośnie przedmiotu publikacji. Jej zadaniem nie było udzielenie specjalistycznej porady. Nie powinni Państwo działać na podstawie informacji zawartych w publikacji bez uzyskania odnośnej specjalistycznej porady. Nie udziela się żadnego oświadczenia ani gwarancji (wyraźnej lub dorozumianej) co do dokładności lub kompletności informacji zawartych w publikacji i w zakresie dozwolonym prawem PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o. nie bierze na siebie żadnych zobowiązań i zrzeka się wszelkiej odpowiedzialności i obowiązku zachowania staranności w związku z konsekwencjami działań lub zaniechań Państwa lub dowolnej innej osoby na podstawie informacji zawartych w niniejszej publikacji oraz wszelkich decyzji podejmowanych na jej podstawie PricewaterhouseCoopers. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone. Nazwa PricewaterhouseCoopers oraz PwC odnosi się do sieci firm członkowskich PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (PwCIL). Każda z firm stanowi oddzielny i niezależny podmiot prawny i żadna nie jest przedstawicielem PwCIL ani żadnej innej firmy członkowskiej. PwCIL nie świadczy żadnych usług na rzecz klientów. PwCIL nie przyjmuje odpowiedzialności ani nie bierze na siebie zobowiązań z tytułu działań lub zaniechań dowolnych swoich firm członkowskich i nie ma zdolności do kontrolowania ich zawodowego osądu ani do zobowiązania ich do czegokolwiek w jakikolwiek sposób. Żadna firma członkowska nie przyjmuje odpowiedzialności ani nie bierze na siebie zobowiązań z tytułu działań lub zaniechań dowolnych innych firm członkowskich i nie ma zdolności do kontrolowania zawodowego osądu jakiejkolwiek innej firmy członkowskiej ani PwCIL, ani do zobowiązania ich do czegokolwiek w jakikolwiek sposób.

Podobne dokumenty

Leasing Projekt Standardu z maja 2013 r. Związek Polskiego Leasingu 27 listopada 2013 r.

www.pwc.com Leasing Projekt Standardu z maja 2013 r. Związek Polskiego Leasingu 27 listopada 2013 r. Kluczowe elementy nowego standardu Definicja leasingu Leasing umowa, w której przekazywane jest prawo